SA Footy

England won the toss and field

Australia 2/166 (33.1 overs)
RT Ponting 63* (67 balls)
MJ Clarke 43* (56 balls)
SR Watson 41 (54 balls)
TD Paine 8 (22 balls)

Australia 2/200 (38.2 overs)

Ponting 81* (82 balls)
Clarke 62* (72 balls)

Ponting OUT 92 (93 balls) c Strauss b Anderson (first ball of the batting powerplay)

Australia 3/228 (42.1 overs)

Clarke 77* (84 balls)

clarke stranded on 99* didnt get to face the last two balls of the innings, maybe even more!

after being 0/30 odd, ENG are now 3/58 with the 3 south africans out! harris with the first two, n tait just got strauss caught behind!

shouldnt lose from here with 36.4 overs to go

Hooray, we won a game!

Australia 5 for 290

Clarke 99 not out
Ponting 92
Watson 41

defeated

England 212

Yardy 57
Morgan 47

Harris 5 for 32 (8.4 overs)
Bollinger 2 f 32 (8)
Smith 2 f 59 (9)
Tait 1 f 23 (7)
Hopes 0 f 56 (10)

Does anyone know why Watto isn't bowling??

Lightning McQueen wrote:Does anyone know why Watto isn't bowling??

Because we have at least 5 bowlers who are better than him..

Pidge wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:Does anyone know why Watto isn't bowling??

Because we have at least 5 bowlers who are better than him..

Wrong.

His batting is just so good right now so need to overwork him.

What have his scores been this series? Everything above 30?

Amazing what difference a 1/2 decent bowling line up does (Tait, Harris & Bollinger) as well as the batsmen posting a decent score.

am i the only one still unimpressed by steven smith's bowling???

yeah he's young, but he's a pie-chucker of the highest order, and he's had a little success so far this tour slogging...

good outfield catch tho...

not saying never, but NOT YET...

Pidge wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:Does anyone know why Watto isn't bowling??

Because we have at least 5 bowlers who are better than him..

Yeah, Hopes is way bette than him

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Pidge wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:Does anyone know why Watto isn't bowling??

Because we have at least 5 bowlers who are better than him..

Yeah, Hopes is way bette than him

Good point LM. My issue with Hopes is that as a stand alone in either skills (bat/bowl) he would not make team. Just as Watson and White have had to realise - you need to be top drawer in one or the other. He is neither. Very middle range ole Hopesy..and one rough head! We genuinely need to let go this pursuit of an all rounder - almost impossible to nail at International level..

Push in the Back wrote:
Good point LM. My issue with Hopes is that as a stand alone in either skills (bat/bowl) he would not make team. Just as Watson and White have had to realise - you need to be top drawer in one or the other. He is neither. Very middle range ole Hopesy..and one rough head! We genuinely need to let go this pursuit of an all rounder - almost impossible to nail at International level..

Totally agree, I'd rather have another frontline bowler or top order batsman than a mediocre all-rounder, he's no pin-up boy either. I can't see why we didn't trial Warner for this series, the selectors could've said to him "Look son, we want 350 runs out of you with a strike rate of over 100 to cement your spot in the World Cup squad". We only have White with the ability to strike at over 100 and he usually strikes at 60 til he gets to 30 or 40 and then gets moving.
I do see Paine as Haddins back-up but I'm not convinced he's the opener we are looking for, maybe we've been blessed by Gilly and have high expectations of keeper/batsmen now.
Hussey is wasted at 6 aswell, maybe he should open, Ponting and Clark bat too close together, neither can smash a quickfire 50 and put the bowling side on the back foot.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Push in the Back wrote:
Good point LM. My issue with Hopes is that as a stand alone in either skills (bat/bowl) he would not make team. Just as Watson and White have had to realise - you need to be top drawer in one or the other. He is neither. Very middle range ole Hopesy..and one rough head! We genuinely need to let go this pursuit of an all rounder - almost impossible to nail at International level..

Totally agree, I'd rather have another frontline bowler or top order batsman than a mediocre all-rounder, he's no pin-up boy either. I can't see why we didn't trial Warner for this series, the selectors could've said to him "Look son, we want 350 runs out of you with a strike rate of over 100 to cement your spot in the World Cup squad". We only have White with the ability to strike at over 100 and he usually strikes at 60 til he gets to 30 or 40 and then gets moving.
I do see Paine as Haddins back-up but I'm not convinced he's the opener we are looking for, maybe we've been blessed by Gilly and have high expectations of keeper/batsmen now.
Hussey is wasted at 6 aswell, maybe he should open, Ponting and Clark bat too close together, neither can smash a quickfire 50 and put the bowling side on the back foot.

Again - on money mate. The team looks 'ungainly'..Missing something. It could be Davey boy, it could be that Punter is coming to end, Huss too low (and coming to end), Hopes (as discussed), Paine def better suited to middle/latter order. Bowling is sound and with Mitch is wings will more times than not keep Aussies in contest. The biggest concern hypothetically is if you are to remove Punter, D Huss, Hopes and maybe even Clarke (though he has had a few scores in ODI) who comes in??
Have tried D Huss, Voges - neither demanded to stay in. Ferg - on comeback. Then where - George Bailey? I like Finch from Vic and I would also be playing Shaun Marsh - good player. As much as he sounds like a loose cannon i reckon Pommersbach still has a future with Aust cricket particularlin in short formats.

Push in the Back wrote:Again - on money mate. The team looks 'ungainly'..Missing something. It could be Davey boy, it could be that Punter is coming to end, Huss too low (and coming to end), Hopes (as discussed), Paine def better suited to middle/latter order. Bowling is sound and with Mitch is wings will more times than not keep Aussies in contest. The biggest concern hypothetically is if you are to remove Punter, D Huss, Hopes and maybe even Clarke (though he has had a few scores in ODI) who comes in??
Have tried D Huss, Voges - neither demanded to stay in. Ferg - on comeback. Then where - George Bailey? I like Finch from Vic and I would also be playing Shaun Marsh - good player. As much as he sounds like a loose cannon i reckon Pommersbach still has a future with Aust cricket particularlin in short formats.

I hope he comes back soon, we need him. Also I hope Ferg gets some form into him and pushes hard for selection.

jackpot jim wrote:Amazing what difference a 1/2 decent bowling line up does (Tait, Harris & Bollinger) as well as the batsmen posting a decent score.

Harris should be a permanent player in both the test and one sides. IMO we have struggled without him.

MarblePark wrote:am i the only one still unimpressed by steven smith's bowling???

yeah he's young, but he's a pie-chucker of the highest order, and he's had a little success so far this tour slogging...

good outfield catch tho...

not saying never, but NOT YET...

Agreed, he has bowled some poo but how about the ball he bowled to get rid of Luke Wright. Bowled hom round the legs, it was a pretty good nut IMO.

NFC wrote:

Pidge wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:Does anyone know why Watto isn't bowling??

Because we have at least 5 bowlers who are better than him..

Wrong.

His batting is just so good right now so need to overwork him.

What have his scores been this series? Everything above 30?

His scores are 32, 57, 61 and 41 so far. 191 runs @ 47.75

A loosener from Tait at 97.1 MPH for his first ball. LOL.

My EA Falcon struggles at that speed.

And then the big ton!