SA Footy

God help us if he does get the job, he might end up putting a GST on all entry prices. Plus he doesn't know how to bowl.

Excellent, just what the sport needs - more old cricket tragics.

Must have been based on natural talent then ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0o8by05rtMY

Disgraceful decision IMO. CA and NZ Cricket should be ashamed of themselves for nominating him.

Brucetiki wrote:Disgraceful decision IMO. CA and NZ Cricket should be ashamed of themselves for nominating him.

More politics than cricket ability required for the position unfortunately.

cant bat,cant bowl,cant catch

He'll probably say that Bangladesh has weapons of mass destruction and get the ICC to invade them.

shame shame shame

MightyEagles wrote:God help us if he does get the job, he might end up putting a GST on all entry prices. Plus he doesn't know how to bowl.

Neither does the world's leading wicket taker in Tests.

regards,

REB

Rik E Boy wrote:

MightyEagles wrote:God help us if he does get the job, he might end up putting a GST on all entry prices. Plus he doesn't know how to bowl.

Neither does the world's leading wicket taker in Tests.

regards,

REB

Well played REB, love it.

Brucetiki wrote:Disgraceful decision IMO. CA and NZ Cricket should be ashamed of themselves for nominating him.

Don't blame cricket NZ... they were hellbent on getting there former CEO the gig. Cricket Australia is the sole beneficiary/cause of this decision. From memory the australian rugby union also tried to get a similar deal under way last year involving howard but the international rugby community wouldn't allow it. will be interesting to see what happens when his stubborn ways conflict with the power bloc.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/nati ... 5871854183

I never thought I'd agree with the Indian's on anything cricket related, but it looks like Zimbabwe, South Africa and India are all going to object to Howard's nomination

Lets hope a few more countries object and he doesn't get the nod.

I'd vote for Johnny (again!).

smac wrote:Excellent, just what the sport needs - more old cricket tragics.

Brucetiki wrote:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/national/john-howard-no-balled-on-world-cricket-job/story-e6frea8c-1225871854183

I never thought I'd agree with the Indian's on anything cricket related, but it looks like Zimbabwe, South Africa and India are all going to object to Howard's nomination

Lets hope a few more countries object and he doesn't get the nod.

"We will decide which cricketers come to this country and the circumstances in which they come"

shoe boy wrote:cant bat,cant bowl,cant catch

must be related to phil tufnell

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:

shoe boy wrote:cant bat,cant bowl,cant catch

must be related to phil tufnell

or scott muller

the wonder elephant wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:

shoe boy wrote:cant bat,cant bowl,cant catch

must be related to phil tufnell

or scott muller

Honestly, how often do we hear what the President of the ICC does?

Never. Zero times per week- unless we search for it.

Our former PM will make headlines for a day or two, then the occasional by-line in the sports section when/if something major happens.

Also, he's proven through the running of this country that he's an able administrator. Got my vote... for the first time...