by Grahaml » Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:06 am
It will be very, very hard for Brett Lee to get back that quickly. The potency of the guys there at the moment is fantastic, and the balance is pretty much right I think, especially given there is no obvious spin cantidate to demand a place. And I also think Brett Lee was a little average. It was pointed out the next highest wicket-taker in cricket history to have an inferior "best bowling" is Flintoff. He was fast early and was too fast for some tail enders and has played a heck of a lot since. But he has always struggled to get top class batsmen out. The best aren't worried by pace too much, and sadly Lee hasn't got another string to his bow. I think Stuart Clark might take a place in the side when he recovers though.
But having said that I also would like to say I'm thrilled he wants his place back. he should absolutely be fired up to earn it back, and bowling the first ball of the ashes is as good a goal as anything. I might question his ability to earn a spot back or to get good batsmen out regularly but I'd never question his effort. He probably ranks as one of the hardest working cricketers ever and always gave every ounce of effort in everything he ever did on the park. To run in and bowl full throttle with a stress fracture in the foot is gutsy stuff.
And on the point about sprinters he is right, but the problem is he isn't a sprinter. He might be using the same fast twitch fibers but it's a very different ball game. Where a sprinter just runs in a straight line (or a bit of a curve if it's a longer sprint) a bowler has to jump and hurl a ball over his head. A sprinter would never have the back, elbow, shoulder and leg troubles a bowler would get. Sadly for Brett I think while his idea might give him hope (and more power to him) the main reason a bowler slows down isn't because he can't run in as fast, but because he can't propel the ball with the same ferocity.