Page 1 of 2

T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:16 pm
by magpie in the 80's
Here is Australia's 13 man squad for the 20/20 match against New Zealand on this sunday night at the S.C.G.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/ ... 88,00.html

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:24 pm
by rod_rooster
Shouldn't this be on the "Other Sports" forum?

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:57 pm
by panther
Meanwhile the possibly the best 20/20 middle order batsman in the country has not made the squad

Travis Birt

It will be a Travisty of justice when he does

ps
rod/rooster
love your comment :lol:

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:34 pm
by smac
rod_rooster wrote:Shouldn't this be on the "Other Sports" forum?

Or "The Future of Cricket" forum. Catch up, or get left behind. :D

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:57 pm
by catchisthecry
Glad Fergy is in.
Really looking the goods at this level!
Hopefully bats up the order a bit..

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:58 pm
by rod_rooster
smac wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:Shouldn't this be on the "Other Sports" forum?

Or "The Future of Cricket" forum. Catch up, or get left behind. :D


If 20/20 is the future of cricket then what a shame.

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:29 pm
by Hondo
It's the future of limited over cricket

IMO, 50 over cricket is finished but we'll spend the next 5 years pretending it isn't so! There'll be a final ODI World Cup sometime in the next 10 years is my big call :shock:

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:20 pm
by smithy
hondo71 wrote:It's the future of limited over cricket

IMO, 50 over cricket is finished


i agree Hondo

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:29 pm
by Dirko
smithy wrote:
hondo71 wrote:It's the future of limited over cricket

IMO, 50 over cricket is finished


i agree Hondo


x 2

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 1:37 am
by NFC
I still prefer 50 overs.

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:23 am
by Pidge
NFC wrote:I still prefer 50 overs.


Same

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:46 am
by Gozu
Moises Henriques, who btw is currently playing for the NSW Second XI. When did Skull become a selector?

Batting and fielding averages Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St
First-class 9 16 1 322 55 21.46 656 49.08 0 1 37 4 2 0
List A 19 15 3 204 43* 17.00 258 79.06 0 0 15 6 7 0
Twenty20 14 12 1 161 42 14.63 135 119.25 0 0 18 2 8 0


Bowling averages Mat Inns Balls Runs Wkts BBI BBM Ave Econ SR 4w 5w 10
First-class 9 12 910 431 15 5/17 5/40 28.73 2.84 60.6 0 2 0
List A 19 18 727 671 16 3/29 3/29 41.93 5.53 45.4 0 0 0
Twenty20 14 12 222 296 10 2/19 2/19 29.60 8.00 22.2 0 0 0

When is Cullen Bailey getting his call up?

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:17 am
by Lightning McQueen
Gozu wrote:Moises Henriques, who btw is currently playing for the NSW Second XI. When did Skull become a selector?

Batting and fielding averages Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St
First-class 9 16 1 322 55 21.46 656 49.08 0 1 37 4 2 0
List A 19 15 3 204 43* 17.00 258 79.06 0 0 15 6 7 0
Twenty20 14 12 1 161 42 14.63 135 119.25 0 0 18 2 8 0


Bowling averages Mat Inns Balls Runs Wkts BBI BBM Ave Econ SR 4w 5w 10
First-class 9 12 910 431 15 5/17 5/40 28.73 2.84 60.6 0 2 0
List A 19 18 727 671 16 3/29 3/29 41.93 5.53 45.4 0 0 0
Twenty20 14 12 222 296 10 2/19 2/19 29.60 8.00 22.2 0 0 0

When is Cullen Bailey getting his call up?


Cullen Bailey hasn't met any of the 2 criteria that will get you a berth.

1) He hasn't done anything.
2) He is not from New South Wales.

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:22 am
by Lightning McQueen
smac wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:Shouldn't this be on the "Other Sports" forum?

Or "The Future of Cricket" forum. Catch up, or get left behind. :D

Whether you like it or not, it has attracted a new breed of supporters that were never interested in cricket previously, if you don't like it, you don't have to watch it.

I'm not a big fan of it, I must say it is a pretty good spectactle though, a fast paced game with some big hitting and desperate fielding. Give me the last hour of a close test match any day.

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:35 am
by Drop Bear
Was interesting to hear Glenn McGrath's comments on David Warner last night on 5AA. He was talking about how Warner was crucified by the media after failing in the one dayers. Good to hear somebody stick up for the bloke!

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:41 pm
by Rik E Boy
smac wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:Shouldn't this be on the "Other Sports" forum?

Or "The Future of Cricket" forum. Catch up, or get left behind. :D


Newer, shorter and dumber doesn't necessarily mean better. Head down to the music shop to see what I mean. Teeball is junk cricket...you don't want to get fat on it or you'll soon be forgetting why you watched the great game in the first place.

regards,

REB

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:43 pm
by Rik E Boy
hondo71 wrote:It's the future of limited over cricket

IMO, 50 over cricket is finished but we'll spend the next 5 years pretending it isn't so! There'll be a final ODI World Cup sometime in the next 10 years is my big call :shock:


Nah, you borrowed it off someone else. It was a former player who said there won't be too many more World Cups. I'd rather lose that than Test cricket though if that is the choice.

regards,

REB

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:07 pm
by Hondo
Dean Jones was the one I heard say it REB. Is that who you heard?

Although he said the next World Cup will be the last one ... I'm not sure it will die that quick.

He does have a vested interest because of his involvement with the ICL.

It's also my personal opinion. I feel that the ODI format will quickly become outdated. People will either commit 3 hours or 5 days to following a game. 1 day will become caught in between - too long for one format and too short for the other. I can't see the game supporting 2 versions of limited over cricket. Schedulers will leave room for the traditional game and then fill the rest with their new cash cow says my crystal ball.

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:12 pm
by Rik E Boy
I think you might be right there Hondo but I just hate what teeball has done to the domestic summer. I'm becoming a bigger fan of EPL every year but I do understand that I am in the minority and that money talks.

regards,

REB

Re: T20 match Aust v New Zealand

PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 7:28 am
by drebin
The problem is for cricket going forward IMO is that if 50 over games go in favour of 20/20 is the flow on effect to Test Cricket.

Players being saturated with a 20/20 comparable to the 50 over schedules they have endured over the past decade will mean they may over time (it is already creeping in IMO) become conditioned to the style of play which then creeps into first class / Test matches. They could in time turn test matches into a quasi 20/20 style of game and be over barely after it begins.

I know we have had tests in recent years that have at times lasted 2-3 and there was a push for 4 day test matches but the 20/20 influence is likely to see people calling for 2 day test matches if the crash and bash at all costs style "filters" into cricket!