Page 1 of 7
Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:26 pm
by catchisthecry
The young man is on fire again today.
Gee he's timed his run well hasn't he!! Just when the teasm, will be looking for an opener in the next 12 months.
So much of playing cricket for Australia is based on timing - think Hughes, M. Taylor, Slater
...compared to Jacques, Cox etc...
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:37 pm
by Dirk Tazelaar
Surely Chris Rogers would be next in line with a test under his belt and 621 Sheffield Shield runs on the board so far this season.
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:57 pm
by catchisthecry
He might miss the boat too!
with the age of that side the push for a bloke in his early 20's, opposed to another bloke in/near his 30's will be huge IMO
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:59 pm
by wycbloods
catchisthecry wrote:He might miss the boat too!
with the age of that side the push for a bloke in his early 20's, opposed to another bloke in/near his 30's will be huge IMO
very early 20's he only turned 20 last week.
I think he will be promoted a little earlier than really hoped for as he could possibly play for 15 years.
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:01 pm
by hearts on fire
wycbloods wrote:catchisthecry wrote:He might miss the boat too!
with the age of that side the push for a bloke in his early 20's, opposed to another bloke in/near his 30's will be huge IMO
he could possibly play for 15 years.
Thats the beauty about him, his YOUNG and LONG term. We need someone that can be around for years and years and this guy can be the guy to do it.
No point bringing in Rogers, he will just be another Matty Hayden, but not as good!

Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:10 pm
by Pidge
Klinger?
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:10 pm
by hearts on fire
If we are going to bring in Rogers, we might as well bring back Langer.
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:12 pm
by Pidge
hearts on fire wrote:If we are going to bring in Rogers, we might as well bring back Langer.
Why do you say that?
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:13 pm
by hearts on fire
Pidge wrote:hearts on fire wrote:If we are going to bring in Rogers, we might as well bring back Langer.
Why do you say that?
Similar age, probably both as good as each other, BUT Langer has more experience......
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:14 pm
by Pidge
hearts on fire wrote:Pidge wrote:hearts on fire wrote:If we are going to bring in Rogers, we might as well bring back Langer.
Why do you say that?
Similar age, probably both as good as each other, BUT Langer has more experience......
Langer is 37 or 38
Rogers is about 30 - 32
He has been waiting in the wings and is in reasonably good form.
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:21 pm
by dragonsphere
i just cant see them bringing in Rogers, no matter how many runs he has made. and he has made them at the right time too.
The selectors have been shaking things up in the last few months and i wouldnt be surprised if he might sneak in against south africa.
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:22 pm
by dragonsphere
Hughes that is
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:42 pm
by Media Park
dragonsphere wrote:Hughes that is
We're assuming that Matty Hayden's done then?
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:45 pm
by CoverKing
Well Phil Hughes made 93 today against Tassy who has hilfenhaus, geeves, denton in their attack (prob the best in the country) with NSW being bowled out for 172. Tas are 1/4 in response. Shows that the pitch is not the best for batters probably!
If he can get runs on bowling decks, that will enhance his rep more so then scoring big tons on flat decks! Hope too see him in national colours soon.
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:49 pm
by Dirk Tazelaar
dragonsphere wrote:i just cant see them bringing in Rogers, no matter how many runs he has made. and he has made them at the right time too.
The selectors have been shaking things up in the last few months and i wouldnt be surprised if he might sneak in against south africa.
Where is he going to bat?
The only spot in the order that I can see the selectors making a change in the next 3 test matches is number 6.
Hayden won't retire before the end of the South African series and he won't be dropped.
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:50 pm
by dragonsphere
i think matty really needed to make runs in Adelaide. but i am guessing his goal is to play in England and give up after that.
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 4:54 pm
by Tooting Bec
The selectors have made it hard for players who are trying to stretch it out and get those last couple of games for Australia. Remember what the did to Healy who wanted to play one last test at his beloved GABBA? I hope if matt the bat does want to go England he better start scoring and start scoring big knocks. Or else he will miss the plane....
What's wrong with Klinger as an option if he continues to make runs. He's only 28.
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 5:28 pm
by rod_rooster
Tooting Bec wrote:The selectors have made it hard for players who are trying to stretch it out and get those last couple of games for Australia. Remember what the did to Healy who wanted to play one last test at his beloved GABBA? I hope if matt the bat does want to go England he better start scoring and start scoring big knocks. Or else he will miss the plane....
What's wrong with Klinger as an option if he continues to make runs. He's only 28.
The difference is that when Healy was forced out Australia were easily better than anyone else and had a heap of experience and even more talent. The side was so stable and it was an easier decision to discard such an experienced and talented player. Same decision is not as easy to make now.
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:05 pm
by Killa
Easily open up with hayden and move kat down.
Re: Phil Hughes

Posted:
Wed Dec 03, 2008 12:22 am
by NFC
HUGHES= GUN!!!