Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:26 amGreat to see the BCCI not getting their way with this one.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,,24605113-23212,00.html
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,,24605113-23212,00.html
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:26 amRe: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:26 amGood.
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:58 amrod_rooster wrote:Great to see the BCCI not getting their way with this one.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,,24605113-23212,00.html
Well what do you know! Hell has finally frozen over.
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:03 amDrop Bear wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Great to see the BCCI not getting their way with this one.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,,24605113-23212,00.html
Well what do you know! Hell has finally frozen over.
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:14 amMightyEagles wrote:Good.
My thoughts exactly.
Are they going to go home now that the ICC didn't bow to their demand? Oh thats right they are already home and now all we will hear is them sooking. I see the BCCI accused the ICC of having the outcome of the appeal pre-determined. They don't like any decision that goes against them and have the cheek to accuse the ICC of not giving him a fair appeal.
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 12:44 pmAt least they (India) are consistent. Never happy unless they have things entirely their own way.
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 12:55 pmsmac wrote:At least they (India) are consistent. Never happy unless they have things entirely their own way.
I think you will find that is Mrs.Boon...
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:13 pmBooney wrote:smac wrote:At least they (India) are consistent. Never happy unless they have things entirely their own way.
I think you will find that is Mrs.Boon...
Thin ice mate thin ice!
regards,
REB
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:17 pmBooney wrote:smac wrote:At least they (India) are consistent. Never happy unless they have things entirely their own way.
I think you will find that is Mrs.Boon...
I'm hearing ya brother....
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:54 pmThey are talking about ignoring the rejection and playing him anyway...
Would that mean the match is not given Test status (for instance when Sehwag was banned for excessive appealing, but was played anyway), or would the result be considered a forfeit, and a drawn series?
Would that mean the match is not given Test status (for instance when Sehwag was banned for excessive appealing, but was played anyway), or would the result be considered a forfeit, and a drawn series?
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:55 pmMarblePark wrote:They are talking about ignoring the rejection and playing him anyway...
Would that mean the match is not given Test status (for instance when Sehwag was banned for excessive appealing, but was played anyway), or would the result be considered a forfeit, and a drawn series?
One would think it's be deemed a forfeit and Australia would win....
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 2:21 pm1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Booney wrote:smac wrote:At least they (India) are consistent. Never happy unless they have things entirely their own way.
I think you will find that is Mrs.Boon...
I'm hearing ya brother....
Beer soothes the soul my friend....beer.
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 2:25 pmSJABC wrote:MarblePark wrote:They are talking about ignoring the rejection and playing him anyway...
Would that mean the match is not given Test status (for instance when Sehwag was banned for excessive appealing, but was played anyway), or would the result be considered a forfeit, and a drawn series?
One would think it's be deemed a forfeit and Australia would win....
Imagine the riots. There is no way it will be ruled a forfeit. The ICC doesn't have the balls. The Indians will probably get their way again
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:06 pmMarblePark wrote:They are talking about ignoring the rejection and playing him anyway...
I'd almost like to see that happen so the world can finally understand what a bunch of wankers the BCCI are.
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:09 pmgambhir does not deserve to play. and it would be a forfeit. playing a player that is no eligible constitutes a forfeit for sure. whether the icc have the guts to enforce it tho is another issue
CoverKing out
CoverKing out
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:26 pmCoverKing wrote:gambhir does not deserve to play. and it would be a forfeit. playing a player that is no eligible constitutes a forfeit for sure. whether the icc have the guts to enforce it tho is another issue
CoverKing out
Yes by the laws it would be a forfeit. By the laws Pakistan refusing to play should have been a forfeit as well........
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:29 pmrod_rooster wrote:CoverKing wrote:gambhir does not deserve to play. and it would be a forfeit. playing a player that is no eligible constitutes a forfeit for sure. whether the icc have the guts to enforce it tho is another issue
CoverKing out
Yes by the laws it would be a forfeit. By the laws Pakistan refusing to play should have been a forfeit as well........
It was!
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:50 pmMythical Creature wrote:rod_rooster wrote:CoverKing wrote:gambhir does not deserve to play. and it would be a forfeit. playing a player that is no eligible constitutes a forfeit for sure. whether the icc have the guts to enforce it tho is another issue
CoverKing out
Yes by the laws it would be a forfeit. By the laws Pakistan refusing to play should have been a forfeit as well........
It was!
You might want to check that again.
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,,23967134-2882,00.html
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:57 pmInteresting 24 hours ahead one thinks 
Re: Gambhir appeal rejected
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:08 pmrod_rooster wrote:Mythical Creature wrote:rod_rooster wrote:CoverKing wrote:gambhir does not deserve to play. and it would be a forfeit. playing a player that is no eligible constitutes a forfeit for sure. whether the icc have the guts to enforce it tho is another issue
CoverKing out
Yes by the laws it would be a forfeit. By the laws Pakistan refusing to play should have been a forfeit as well........
It was!
You might want to check that again.
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,,23967134-2882,00.html
Sorry, I heard they'd changed it. I thought they'd changed back to Hair's original decision.