SA Footy

MATCH ONE
NSW vs SA
Hurstville Oval

NSW Second XI won by 215 runs

NSW 5d/417
UT Khawaja 210* (30 fours, 6 sixes)
EJM Cowan 45
BJ Rohrer 61

C Sayers 0/60 (15 overs)
JK Haberfield 0/70 (17 overs)
DT Christian 1/77 (13.1 overs)
J Donnelly 0/74 (18 overs)
MJ Cosgrove 2/43 (9 overs)
J Brown 0/30 (8 overs)
CB Bailey 2/59 (15 overs)

SA 3d/368
TLW Cooper 55
JD Smith 159* (22 fours, 1 six)
AH Delmont 80
MJ Cosgrove 57
DT Christian 0*

MA Starc 2/61 (14 overs)
NM Hauritz 0/79 (28 overs)
SNJ O'Keefe 0/54 (13 overs)

NSW 6d/334 (60.3 overs)
EJM Cowan 85
SO Henry 73
SJN O'Keefe 58* (43 balls - 2 fours, 5 sixes)
BJ Rohrer 50

C Sayers 0/70 (10 overs)
JK Haberfield 0/41 (8 overs)
DT Christian 2/48 (14 overs)
MJ Cosgrove 0/15 (4overs)
J Donnelly 2/77 (17 overs)
JD Smith 0/8 (1 over)
CB Bailey 1/72 (6 overs)
AH Delmont 1/2 (0.3 overs)

SA 168
J Brown 16
TLW Cooper 2
AH Delmont 22 (111 balls)
MJ Cosgrove 1
DT Christian 12
CB Bailey 14
JD Smith 4
T Davey 23
C Sayers 29
J Donnelly 22
JK Habberfield 7*

SNJ O'Keefe 4/60 (25 overs)
NM Hauritz 2/59 (26 overs)

Observations

- SA Opeining Bowlers 0/241 (50 overs) Sayers 0/130, Haberfield 0/111 (both 25 overs)
- Bailey was the seventh bowler used in both innings (Match figures 3/131, 21 overs)
- Why did Smith bat at number 7 in the second innings?
- Hauritz (not long ago being thought of for Australian duties) now 2/113 (39 overs) in second XI, O'Keefe took 4 SA wickets

brod wrote:Observations

- SA Opeining Bowlers 0/241 (50 overs) Sayers 0/130, Haberfield 0/111 (both 25 overs)
- Bailey was the seventh bowler used in both innings (Match figures 3/131, 21 overs)
- Why did Smith bat at number 7 in the second innings?
- Hauritz (not long ago being thought of for Australian duties) now 2/113 (39 overs) in second XI, O'Keefe took 4 SA wickets

James hurt his shoulder during the course of the first innings

heater31 wrote:

brod wrote:Observations

- SA Opeining Bowlers 0/241 (50 overs) Sayers 0/130, Haberfield 0/111 (both 25 overs)
- Bailey was the seventh bowler used in both innings (Match figures 3/131, 21 overs)
- Why did Smith bat at number 7 in the second innings?
- Hauritz (not long ago being thought of for Australian duties) now 2/113 (39 overs) in second XI, O'Keefe took 4 SA wickets

James hurt his shoulder during the course of the first innings

Thats at least a good reason

This is obviously an important competition, cricinfo Australia still has 2007/08 results, and no mention of last weeks game.

Just looking at last year, to help us remember the good times , SA 2nd XI finished on the bottom with ZERO points

MATCH TWO
WA vs Tasmania
Floreat Oval
Day One - progress

WA 5/239
DC Bandy 120
W Robinson 55

MATCH THREE
SA vs ACT
Adelaide Oval No. 2
Stumps Day One

SA 9/386
JD Smith 2
TLW Cooper 4
AH Delmont 80
CJ Borgas 141
MJ Cosgrove 104
DT Christian 4
J Brown 17
CB Bailey 0
P Connelly 14
KW Richardson 4*
P George 0*

AM Ritchard 4/69
MA Higgs 2/44

SA lost 6/41 in the afternoon session after cruising at 3/341

brod wrote:MATCH THREE
SA vs ACT
Adelaide Oval No. 2
Stumps Day One

SA 9/386
JD Smith 2
TLW Cooper 4
AH Delmont 80
CJ Borgas 141
MJ Cosgrove 104
DT Christian 4
J Brown 17
CB Bailey 0
P Connelly 14
KW Richardson 4*
P George 0*

AM Ritchard 4/69
MA Higgs 2/44

SA lost 6/41 in the afternoon session after cruising at 3/341

Are you surprised, I suppose you would be, we're normally 6/41 and have a wagging tail.

SA v ACT
SA 386
ACT 8/92 at lunch on Day 2

ACT all out for 111 and 2/70 about half an hour ago.

Good to see that the lads are in for a win. will probably need to chase about 100 for outright.

some positives toc ome from this last week of SA Cricket.

Redbacks posted a solid first innings score(not great score but good for recent years) and manged to hold on and make a decent 2nd innings score

2nd 11 had cozzy and borgas hundreds in it and they are much needed runs for both of them. puts borggy up for selection and cozzy something to build on

SA need 141 to win outright. Our bowling in ACT's second innings looks to be dissappointing to say the least.


George, P 21.0 5 57 1
Haberfield, JK 24.0 4 90 4
Richardson, KW 23.0 3 89 1
Cosgrove, MJ 6.0 1 30 0
Brown, J 9.0 0 51 1
Bailey, CB 15.1 1 80 2
Cooper, TLW 1.0 0 4 0


George looks to be the only economical bowler there. Bailey seems to be going for plenty of runs.

Always harder to bowl a team out the second time mate....

yeah George could be anything but he is to nice to be a fast bowler hahaha

good to see "the snake" Haberfield get amongst the wickets

Footy Smart wrote:Always harder to bowl a team out the second time mate....

yeah George could be anything but he is to nice to be a fast bowler hahaha

good to see "the snake" Haberfield get amongst the wickets

understand it is usually harder the second time but they have generally been belted around not just not taking wickets.