SA Footy

Jim05 wrote:Shezhad out for 176 after copping a bouncer to his scone and dropping his bat onto the stumps, was then helped from the field

Stick cricket!

Younus dropped on 99 and scurries through for his century

Misbah brings up his century 3 balls later.
Pakis declare at 3/566
First time in test history that the first 5 batters all made 80+

Jim05 wrote:Misbah brings up his century 3 balls later.
Pakis declare at 3/566
First time in test history that the first 5 batters all made 80+

5 bowlers bowled over 10 overs each went wicketless
BOULT 0/62[26]
SOUTHEE 0/62 [23]
CRAIG 0/126[33]
NEESHAM 0/50 [16]
McCULLUM 0/32 [10.5]
That would be some sort of rarity

Also the disMissAL modes for the 3 wickets
HAFEEZ Caught+ Bowled
SHEHZAD Hit Wicket
ALI Bowled
566 run innings and no Caughts is a rarity

mal wrote:

Jim05 wrote:Misbah brings up his century 3 balls later.
Pakis declare at 3/566
First time in test history that the first 5 batters all made 80+

5 bowlers bowled over 10 overs each went wicketless
BOULT 0/62[26]
SOUTHEE 0/62 [23]
CRAIG 0/126[33]
NEESHAM 0/50 [16]
McCULLUM 0/32 [10.5]
That would be some sort of rarity

Also the disMissAL modes for the 3 wickets
HAFEEZ Caught+ Bowled
SHEHZAD Hit Wicket
ALI Bowled
566 run innings and no Caughts is a rarity

WTF is caught & bowled then MAL?

Caught and Bowled is a catch
However
Caught and Bowled is a different dismissal to purely Caught

Ish Sohdi's dismissal of Azhar Ali in the 1st innings, is being compared to the Gatting Ball

Good ball, but wouldnt even make Warne's Top 30.

mal wrote:Caught and Bowled is a catch
However
Caught and Bowled is a different dismissal to purely Caught

Bullshit.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

mal wrote:Caught and Bowled is a catch
However
Caught and Bowled is a different dismissal to purely Caught

Bullshit.

What he said

That's about the only time I hold my catches

FFS
Ive made a post on the disMIssAL of caught as in caught

Off course caught and bowled is a CATCH
But it ends up in the score book as Caught and Bowled , not purely Caught

Lightning McQueen wrote:

mal wrote:Caught and Bowled is a catch
However
Caught and Bowled is a different dismissal to purely Caught

Bullshit.

When the Bookmakers post a market on how a batter is dismissed, they list
Caught
Caught and Bowled

Both might be catches, but both are a differential

mal wrote:FFS
Ive made a post on the disMIssAL of caught as in caught

Off course caught and bowled is a CATCH
But it ends up in the score book as Caught and Bowled , not purely Caught

Not always, some people put c MAL b MAL

PA
Second innings
2/175
Both players dismissed LBW

So we had 5 Pakistan batters out in this Test as :
Caught and Bowled
Hit Wicket
Bowled
LBW
LBW

PA made 5/741 in this test

That means for the entire match no Pakistan batsman was dismissed listed as CAUGHT in the score book and the official records
There was one Pakistan batter who is in the records as being CAUGHT AND BOWLED in the first innings

One Pakistan batsman was out Bowled in this match
Unless of course THAT Caught and Bowled counts as a Bowled as well...!!!

Rohit Sharma becomes the first player to score 2 double hundreds in ODI's

And now has the highest score in ODI history.
The Lankans are bowling some absolute pies

Rohit Sharma finishes on 264, out last ball of the innings
India finished at 5/404

mal wrote:Caught and Bowled is a catch
However
Caught and Bowled is a different dismissal to purely Caught

Qty = 1 unit

regards,

REB