SA Footy

How well is he going? MVP of the IPL.

Played 4 games
- Is the only player to have won two Man of the Match Awards
BATTING
- 162 runs (5th in IPL)
- 81 ave (4th in IPL)
- 145.94 strike rate
- 2 fifties (e 1st in IPL)
- 16 fours
- 7 sixes (8th in IPL)
BOWLING
- 4 wickets (e 11th in IPL)
- 30.5 ave
- 7.62 RPO

Looking at the stats it hard to argue that

The format suits him no doubt. Good player in 20/20.

NFC wrote:How well is he going? MVP of the IPL.

The shorter the game, the better Watto goes. Apparently the breakaway 5/5 league has offered Watto 5 milliion donuts to ditch IPL next year.

regards,

REB

Rik E Boy wrote:

NFC wrote:How well is he going? MVP of the IPL.

The shorter the game, the better Watto goes. Apparently the breakaway 5/5 league has offered Watto 5 milliion donuts to ditch IPL next year.

regards,

REB

Apparently your post is a load of rubbish.

I have finally relented and started watching my first game tonight
Without knowing the sides I switched on
Umar Gul got a wicket
In came WATTO
Gul bowled a full length ball to WATTO who played it to leg and called no to a single
Then it happened another ******* poor umpiring decision WATTO given out LBW 0
FFS
Inside edges on to the pad and out LBW, is that a new decision in the Indian Pathetic League ?
No more
Got online to post this
Now will channell surf on Foxtel and look for something more appeasing on TV

Plumb

NFC wrote:

Rik E Boy wrote:

NFC wrote:How well is he going? MVP of the IPL.

The shorter the game, the better Watto goes. Apparently the breakaway 5/5 league has offered Watto 5 milliion donuts to ditch IPL next year.

regards,

REB

Apparently your post is a load of rubbish.

He's 5hit. And you know it. That's why he's not doing well in REAL cricket.

regards,

REB

Rik E Boy wrote:

NFC wrote:

Rik E Boy wrote:

NFC wrote:How well is he going? MVP of the IPL.

The shorter the game, the better Watto goes. Apparently the breakaway 5/5 league has offered Watto 5 milliion donuts to ditch IPL next year.

regards,

REB

Apparently your post is a load of rubbish.

He's 5hit. And you know it. That's why he's not doing well in REAL cricket.

regards,

REB

He will be a great test player.

great?

Dogwatcher wrote:great?

Turn up your hearing aid gramps.

No problem with my hearing.
Must be having blurred vision - as I still see the words "great" and "test player" in the same sentence when referring to Shane Watson.
No doubt he will again play test cricket, but the other word.....

NFC wrote:He will be a great test player.

(Six hours+Ninety Overs)*5=Shane Watson???

A- He's not good enough
B -He's not fit enough.
C- The end.

regards,

REB

Took 2/22 the other night. Another top performance.

Shane Watson is very very average.......... He is OKAY in ODI's and 20/20's but is HOPELESS in Test match cricket...........

Dogwatcher wrote:No problem with my hearing.
Must be having blurred vision - as I still see the words "great" and "test player" in the same sentence when referring to Shane Watson.
No doubt he will again play test cricket, but the other word.....

DW...

"Shane Watson", "great" and "Test player" do go well in the same sentence. Allow me to demonstrate.

Shane Watson has a great deal of improvement to do to become a test player.

Shane Watson would provide a great amount of disappointment as a test player.

Shane Watson will never be a great test player.

Shane Watson in the team will provide one less opportunity for a good player to become a great test player.

pafc1870 wrote:

Dogwatcher wrote:No problem with my hearing.
Must be having blurred vision - as I still see the words "great" and "test player" in the same sentence when referring to Shane Watson.
No doubt he will again play test cricket, but the other word.....

DW...

"Shane Watson", "great" and "Test player" do go well in the same sentence. Allow me to demonstrate.

Shane Watson has a great deal of improvement to do to become a test player.

Shane Watson would provide a great amount of disappointment as a test player.

Shane Watson will never be a great test player.

Shane Watson in the team will provide one less opportunity for a good player to become a great test player.

Gold

rod_rooster wrote:

pafc1870 wrote:

Dogwatcher wrote:No problem with my hearing.
Must be having blurred vision - as I still see the words "great" and "test player" in the same sentence when referring to Shane Watson.
No doubt he will again play test cricket, but the other word.....

DW...

"Shane Watson", "great" and "Test player" do go well in the same sentence. Allow me to demonstrate.

Shane Watson has a great deal of improvement to do to become a test player.

Shane Watson would provide a great amount of disappointment as a test player.

Shane Watson will never be a great test player.

Shane Watson in the team will provide one less opportunity for a good player to become a great test player.

Gold

Funny, I didn't find it so...

Great,Watson has been picked for the Test side again.

Booney wrote:Great,Watson has been picked for the Test side again.

Whats wrong with that ?
Now we have something to chat about on SAFOOTY