by spell_check » Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:34 pm
by smithy » Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:49 pm
by spell_check » Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:58 pm
by spell_check » Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:06 am
by smac » Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:28 am
by locky801 » Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:42 pm
by Dogwatcher » Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:51 pm
by Dogwatcher » Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:52 pm
by Dogwatcher » Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:02 pm
by RustyCage » Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:07 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/boys-club-as-insecure-as-the-nightwatchmen/2007/12/13/1197135651501.html?page=2
Boys' club as insecure as the nightwatchmen
Email Printer friendly version Normal font Large font Jessica Halloran
December 14, 2007
In the first interview of her new job last summer Stephanie Brantz placed a microphone under the cute nose of the model Lara Bingle.
Here was the woman employed by Channel Nine to produce serious reports on cricket, interviewing a model who had previously appeared in a green bikini and cricket pads to promote the Ashes.
I was embarrassed and we now know that Brantz was, too. Who knows what hundreds of thousands of female fans of the game made of it all.
Sadly, Brantz's predicament was hardly surprising.
It would be fair to say that while women can be seen on television, it is preferred that their opinions on sport are not heard. Why? Is it because some of the old boys feel threatened when we put a high heel on their turf?
It was revealed in the Herald this week that Brantz's Channel Nine boss, Steve Crawley, had told her the Australian cricket team "didn't want to be interviewed" by her.
That, we now know, is incorrect.
But while the sexist network bosses keep their jobs and wheel out the same, tired, wrinkled male talent, Cricket Australia is asking for a change.
In an effort to increase the number of women watching and attending the game, Cricket Australia has gone to television and radio broadcasters encouraging them to include female journalists in their coverage. Cricket Australia believes that more women talking about overs, techniques and runs are needed to boost the number of female cricket fans, which is sitting at 35 per cent.
Those who run the networks and the radio stations say that women don't care about the gender of the commentator; they just want someone who knows what they are talking about.
Well, boys, here's the scoop: there are plenty of women who know exactly what they are talking about.
While the AFL manages to have a number of female journalists on television, radio and in print reporting and commenting on the state of the game, the number of women covering NRL, rugby union and cricket is dismally low.
One of the only sports programs that showcases women's views on sport, the ABC's Offsiders, features the respected AFL reporter Caroline Wilson and my Herald colleague Jacquelin Magnay, who has covered sport for 20 years.
Magnay has seen many talented women fall through the cracks in TV and she knows why.
"They offer women jobs and say it's not a token offer but when then the women show they are more than capable, the men are threatened and inevitably withdraw support from them in that position," she says.
More than 20 years ago, the actress and writer Kate Fitzpatrick made history by being the first woman in the Channel Nine cricket commentary box - and she was quickly turfed out.
Fitzpatrick felt empathy for Brantz yesterday. But she was also in stitches when told that Crawley had informed Brantz the players did not want to be interviewed by her.
"That sounds like the biggest load of bullshit," Fitzpatrick said. "I've never heard of a cricket player not wanting to talk to a woman in my life."
Fitzpatrick said there had been little movement at the cricket microphone because the men that held the position there were insecure.
"Those guys are terrified of losing their jobs," she said. "They have been since I stepped into the cricket commentary box back in the 1980s … Some of those guys are appalling at their job. Everyone watches it on the TV, turns off the sound and listens to it on the ABC. No one listens to what those men have to say on Channel Nine.
"They make out like it's difficult," she says. "They just need to teach a woman how to call it ball by ball. It's not rocket science."
Strangely, Fitzpatrick made it a step further than Brantz back in the 1980s, by making it into the commentary box - if only briefly.
"I did have a lot of sympathy for her," Fitzpatrick said. "When I heard she had taken the job I thought, 'She's on a hiding to nothing'."
After the Bingle interview, the summer didn't get any better for the latest casualty of the brotherhood that runs TV sport. Brantz was never given the opportunity to interview cricketers or to file reports on the game.
Still under contract with the network, she was a brave woman to speak out publicly against the "blokey" culture at Channel Nine. Hopefully, some day, someone will take note of her words and have the courage to change the sexist sporting landscape.
And hopefully, then we won't have to hear from giggly bikini models dressed up as cricketers any more.
by Hondo » Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:18 pm
by spell_check » Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:30 pm
smac wrote:Michael Holding I think commentated for a season or 2 as well, mon.
by Dogwatcher » Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:35 pm
pafc1870 wrote: There will be a female commentator in cricket when they find a good female commentator of cricket. Brantz wasn't good, from what Ive read Fitzpatrick was woeful, the female they had in South Africa didn't know what she was talking about. Get some retired female cricketers in there, people who know what they are talking about.
by Dogwatcher » Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:37 pm
hondo71 wrote:Max Walker spoke at a work function a couple of years ago and gave an interesting insight into Tony Greig's and Ian Chappell's longevity on Ch 9.
Apparently because of what both guys gave up to go with Kerry Packer's WSC - particularly Greigy who gave up the England Captaincy never to play test cricket again and ostrocised from the MCC establishment for years - Packer promised both of them jobs 'for life' with Channell 9. With Greigy the gratitude extended to paying off significant personal debts at the time.
It's not what you know sometimes .....
by locky801 » Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:41 pm
by Dogwatcher » Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:48 pm
by locky801 » Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:56 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:i wasn't necessarily saying Chappelli's a bad commentator, but he's had some amazing stuff ups over the years. Others would have got the ar*e for them.
Have you read his last book Locky? I think it was called Chappelli Speaks, very interesting.
by westozfalcon » Sat Dec 22, 2007 9:21 pm
by spell_check » Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:45 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:hondo71 wrote:Max Walker spoke at a work function a couple of years ago and gave an interesting insight into Tony Greig's and Ian Chappell's longevity on Ch 9.
Apparently because of what both guys gave up to go with Kerry Packer's WSC - particularly Greigy who gave up the England Captaincy never to play test cricket again and ostrocised from the MCC establishment for years - Packer promised both of them jobs 'for life' with Channell 9. With Greigy the gratitude extended to paying off significant personal debts at the time.
It's not what you know sometimes .....
I agree on this too (gee I'm agreeable today) I've often figured that their longevity had a lot to do with this. Greig in particular suffered considerably from his decision to join Packer's Circus. I think he'd be one of the few players who received death threats. He also spent the most time in the courts of any of the players. Under different circumstances the gaffes of Greig and Chappell in the commentary box would have seen them go the way of Doug Mulray.
by Strawb » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:31 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |