by bayman » Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:50 pm
by bayman » Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:51 pm
by RoosterMarty » Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:57 pm
by am Bays » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:07 pm
by bayman » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:09 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Fair Dinkum you'd kick your stumps over and walk off wouldn't ya??
Poor Mitch Johnson he's done nothing wrong but he'll carry teh drinks given the way teh MCG pitch has played this year
by Dirko » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:11 pm
bayman wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Fair Dinkum you'd kick your stumps over and walk off wouldn't ya??
Poor Mitch Johnson he's done nothing wrong but he'll carry teh drinks given the way teh MCG pitch has played this year
i thought dr. stuart clarke might get that gig tassie
by RoosterMarty » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:12 pm
by bayman » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:16 pm
by am Bays » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:47 pm
SJABC wrote:bayman wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Fair Dinkum you'd kick your stumps over and walk off wouldn't ya??
Poor Mitch Johnson he's done nothing wrong but he'll carry teh drinks given the way teh MCG pitch has played this year
i thought dr. stuart clarke might get that gig tassie
Why ? Play four pacemen....
by am Bays » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:48 pm
RoosterMarty wrote:Clark won't get dropped from the Test team, he's been one of the best bowlers in world cricket since debuting!
by mal » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:55 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:RoosterMarty wrote:Clark won't get dropped from the Test team, he's been one of the best bowlers in world cricket since debuting!
Spot on RM too many selection credits to get dropped ATM
by Pup » Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:08 pm
bayman wrote:rm, i reckon he has been ordinary for a while
by am Bays » Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:44 pm
Pup wrote:bayman wrote:rm, i reckon he has been ordinary for a while
Disagree, was poor against Sri Lanka but before that you can not fault him IMO.
They will not drop Johnson IMO, they will either play 4 paceman or Tait will miss out, i just dont see how they can justify dropping Johnson after so little time, he also was very servicable. I think the 4 man pace attack would be more likely.
by Pup » Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:48 pm
by am Bays » Wed Dec 12, 2007 6:42 am
Pup wrote:If thats the way you wanna go then since they dont play the pace well, then why not play all 4 and leave Hogg out.
by westcoastpanther » Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:26 pm
by tedbullpit » Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:41 pm
by stan » Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:44 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Pup wrote:If thats the way you wanna go then since they dont play the pace well, then why not play all 4 and leave Hogg out.
Becasue the Melbourne pitch is a turner with low bounce ATM, we need a spinner. I was of the same opinion 4 quicks until the reports on teh Melb pitch came through
by locky801 » Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:40 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |