SA Footy

70, a wicket and a superb catch.

What more needs to be said? The man does it all.

NFC wrote:70, a wicket and a superb catch.

What more needs to be said? The man does it all.

He's been one of the best batsmen in first class cricket for a while, just gets injured (and bowled too much).

pafc1870 wrote:

NFC wrote:70, a wicket and a superb catch.

What more needs to be said? The man does it all.

He's been one of the best batsmen in first class cricket for a while, just gets injured (and bowled too much).

He's clearly adjusted his run up. Loved seeing Symonds mock the new approach.

NFC wrote:70, a wicket and a superb catch.

What more needs to be said? The man does it all.

really is an ALL ROUNDER after that performance

You've had to wait until December to post this one NFC. I'm posting in this thread because Watt000 has provided me with much enjoyment this Cricket season and I for one appreciate his 'eff0rts'.

Now that he has finally got past 30 you watch the selectors pick the lemon.

regards,

REB

He got through an entire game without injuring himself

ROD good post !

Im going to be objective with WATTO this season

BATTING
I still maintain he should concentate on his batting and become a front line batsman
The man averages 48 in p/cup cricket, thats exceptional in a very tough domestic comp.
He is trying out as an opener, and whilst his first 2 games have been poor it is too early
to denounce him a failure
Scores of 000 + 13 in the short term are poor, but long term ?
His batting in the Franger cup is good with scores of 28+ 70
The first half of those 70 runs were made against some very very good bowlers in
Gillespie/Harris and typhoon Tait who are a formidable unit

FIELDING
Reliable fielder neither outstanding or brilliant

BOWLING
had 6 overs 1/22 early
finished at 8 overs 1/47 v SA
ordinary effort on a helpful wicket
nothing enthused me about his bowling
as a fifth bowler his efforts are ok as he bats well in o/d games
if i have to rate him as a frontline bowler i simply cant
BUT
He was first up from a long spell and may improve

INJURIES
as Garth Porter from Sherbet once sang "Its Just A Matter Of Time." if he keeps bowling

REB
Dont mind you calling him the operator 000 and having a crack when Watto
fails, gets injured etc, but please acknowledge his achievements as well
Not one mention from you [and others ] about his outstanding 70 v SA

NFC
Where were you last season when I needed you !

Mal, you are right. I have said all along that Watto should give the bowling away for 2 reasons. Firstly he just keeps injuring himself when bowling and secondly he's no good at it.

Is he good enough to play International cricket as a batsman? For most other countries yes, for Australia no. Therein lies his dilema. He knows this too and realises his only chance to play for Australia is as an allrounder. If nothing else it should provide REB and myself with plenty of amusement watching him get belted around the park before breaking down yet again.

His best chance to play Test Cricket is to make runs as an opener
Matt Hayden cannot go on forever
Hungry Jaques despite an amazing series v SL still needs to consolidate
Chris Rogers is not equipped to make runs at the highest level[in my opinion]
A good season in p/cup with the bat will enhance Watsons test prospects
Getting injured bowling again and he could become a district cricketer

But in the mean time the tag team will continue to duel
MAL/NFC V ROD/REB

His best chance to play Test cricket would be to relocate to another country.

rod_rooster wrote:Mal, you are right. I have said all along that Watto should give the bowling away for 2 reasons. Firstly he just keeps injuring himself when bowling and secondly he's no good at it.

Is he good enough to play International cricket as a batsman? For most other countries yes, for Australia no. Therein lies his dilema. He knows this too and realises his only chance to play for Australia is as an allrounder. If nothing else it should provide REB and myself with plenty of amusement watching him get belted around the park before breaking down yet again.

Is Symonds? No. And Watson's bowling is every bit as good as Symonds, in fact stats indicate he's better which I think he is, but others may disagree. But regardless, if they can find a place for Symonds then they can certainly fit in Watto.

NFC wrote:

rod_rooster wrote:Mal, you are right. I have said all along that Watto should give the bowling away for 2 reasons. Firstly he just keeps injuring himself when bowling and secondly he's no good at it.

Is he good enough to play International cricket as a batsman? For most other countries yes, for Australia no. Therein lies his dilema. He knows this too and realises his only chance to play for Australia is as an allrounder. If nothing else it should provide REB and myself with plenty of amusement watching him get belted around the park before breaking down yet again.

Is Symonds? No. And Watson's bowling is every bit as good as Symonds, in fact stats indicate he's better which I think he is, but others may disagree. But regardless, if they can find a place for Symonds then they can certainly fit in Watto.

They can't fit both in and Symonds brings something to the side that Watson can't. Symands is a genuine matchwinner. He can be so damaging and change a game in a very short period. Watson can't do this.

NFC wrote:But regardless, if they can find a place for Symonds then they can certainly fit in Watto.

Oh FFS, Bwah ha ha ha ha ha..........credibility now shot mate

Because no-one would want two all-rounders in their side!

NFC wrote:Is Symonds? No. And Watson's bowling is every bit as good as Symonds, in fact stats indicate he's better which I think he is, but others may disagree. But regardless, if they can find a place for Symonds then they can certainly fit in Watto.

what is the point of having superior stats when you play a blinder once in a blue moon when you are not injured then.....TWANG we are back to square one. Symonds might not be as exeptional as Watt000 stats but at least he is consistantly on the park unlike this lemon

They can't fit both in and Symonds brings something to the side that Watson can't. Symands is a genuine matchwinner. He can be so damaging and change a game in a very short period. Watson can't do this.[/quote]

one dayers yes.
after his 1st 20inns in tests still only ave bout 15 with the bat

Might want to check those stats again

If it's stats you want to quote Symonds stacks up pretty favourably with Watto at Test level. Watto Averages about 20 with the bat and 61 with the ball.

try his stats before the 2nd inns at the mcg last yr

I'll do that if you would like to provide his stats from the 2006 Boxing Day Test till now