why the poms are useless

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

why the poms are useless

Postby bayman » Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:14 am

at the end of yesterdays play the commentators interviewed the english coach (i think his name was moore) & he said 'that we were hoping to save the game' now why wouldn't you try & win the game ?

this attitude imho is why they get beaten a lot more than they win (trying not to lose first & trying to win 2nd)


give me the job at least then they'd have the RIGHT attitude
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:17 am

It's been the bane of English cricket for many a year.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby rod_rooster » Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:41 am

Completetely agree. I'd prefer to lose the game trying to win it rather than just trying to play out a draw. Imagine the Aussies in the same situation. There is no way known they would be thinking anything other than winning the game.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby jackpot jim » Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:53 pm

Points to Consider.

1/ Trying to SAVE the Game Doesn't Discount the Possibillity of Winning it.

2/ 341 runs more to win in 90 overs with 9 wkts in hand at a R/R of 3.80 on a 5th pitch against the World Record wicket Taker.
S.Lanka 1st Inngs R/R 3.15
S.Lanka 2nd Inngs R/R 3.40
England 1st Inngs R/R 3.01

Considering the Above Facts, I Consider the Statement made by the English Coach to be Appropriate.
jackpot jim
Coach
 
Posts: 6264
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:14 pm
Has liked: 433 times
Been liked: 512 times

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby stan » Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:01 pm

jackpot jim wrote:Points to Consider.

1/ Trying to SAVE the Game Doesn't Discount the Possibillity of Winning it.

2/ 341 runs more to win in 90 overs with 9 wkts in hand at a R/R of 3.80 on a 5th pitch against the World Record wicket Taker.
S.Lanka 1st Inngs R/R 3.15
S.Lanka 2nd Inngs R/R 3.40
England 1st Inngs R/R 3.01

Considering the Above Facts, I Consider the Statement made by the English Coach to be Appropriate.


That may be the case but he has immediatley put England on the back foot and embedded a seige metallity. Playing positive cricket will get you a long way.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15440
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1310 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby Strawb » Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:38 pm

the poms just don't have that winning mentality they don't know how or want to. I would like to see a tight contest for the next ashes.
I am the Voice Left From Drinking
Strawb
Coach
 
 
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 7:16 pm
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: Wingfield Royals

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby Pup » Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:06 pm

jackpot jim wrote:Points to Consider.

1/ Trying to SAVE the Game Doesn't Discount the Possibillity of Winning it.

2/ 341 runs more to win in 90 overs with 9 wkts in hand at a R/R of 3.80 on a 5th pitch against the World Record wicket Taker.
S.Lanka 1st Inngs R/R 3.15
S.Lanka 2nd Inngs R/R 3.40
England 1st Inngs R/R 3.01

Considering the Above Facts, I Consider the Statement made by the English Coach to be Appropriate.


Add to that no side has ever scored over 324 in a 4th innings in Kandy.
You sunk my Scrabbleship
User avatar
Pup
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:09 am
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby locky801 » Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:10 pm

They have basically always played negative cricket, perhaps if they set themselves a challenge once in a while they may well be surprised of the results, records are made to be broken, however even if they had a shot at this one can't see them getting close. The need to play more aggressive cricket in all aspects of the game, always to negative in test cricket for my likning
Life is about moments, Create them
User avatar
locky801
Coach
 
Posts: 58655
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:11 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has liked: 4393 times
Been liked: 1419 times

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby bayman » Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:47 pm

well i just got home & the poms are 5/90 with 77 overs left, the 5 wickets have fallen in 26 overs, perhaps if they sensibly attacked they could be 5/150 & a silly hope rather than waiting for the inevitable :roll: :roll:
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby bulldogproud » Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:52 am

rod_rooster wrote:Completetely agree. I'd prefer to lose the game trying to win it rather than just trying to play out a draw. Imagine the Aussies in the same situation. There is no way known they would be thinking anything other than winning the game.


Go back to the Ashes series of 2005. The Aussies were trying to save games then rather than win them. If anything England have had a far more positive approach to their game in recent times. That is why there were no draws in the 2006-07 Ashes series.
Cheers
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Location: West Beach
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 401 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby Mic » Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:44 pm

A draw for England is a win for them. :wink:
User avatar
Mic
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3125
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:17 pm
Has liked: 170 times
Been liked: 154 times

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby am Bays » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:00 pm

bulldogproud wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:Completetely agree. I'd prefer to lose the game trying to win it rather than just trying to play out a draw. Imagine the Aussies in the same situation. There is no way known they would be thinking anything other than winning the game.


Go back to the Ashes series of 2005. The Aussies were trying to save games then rather than win them. If anything England have had a far more positive approach to their game in recent times. That is why there were no draws in the 2006-07 Ashes series.
Cheers


We saved (played for a draw) in one game, Old Trafford. The other games we we actually tried to win and lost by 2 runs and 3 wickets respectively....

Go back the previous three series ther is no doubt who played the more atttractive cricket indeed the only test England won in 2001 was when we gifted them an easy chase down 330 with a full day to bat...
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19615
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2082 times

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby bulldogproud » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:18 pm

So you are admitting that in the last ten tests they have played against each other Australia have played for a draw once more than England have. Thanks, I rest my case. :wink:
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Location: West Beach
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 401 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby bayman » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:20 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
bulldogproud wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:Completetely agree. I'd prefer to lose the game trying to win it rather than just trying to play out a draw. Imagine the Aussies in the same situation. There is no way known they would be thinking anything other than winning the game.


Go back to the Ashes series of 2005. The Aussies were trying to save games then rather than win them. If anything England have had a far more positive approach to their game in recent times. That is why there were no draws in the 2006-07 Ashes series.
Cheers


We saved (played for a draw) in one game, Old Trafford. The other games we we actually tried to win and lost by 2 runs and 3 wickets respectively....

Go back the previous three series ther is no doubt who played the more atttractive cricket indeed the only test England won in 2001 was when we gifted them an easy chase down 330 with a full day to bat...



c'mon tassie are you trying to be a comedian ? (remember 40,000 commedians out of work if you are trying to be one :shock: ) england chasing 330 on a full day that is USUALLY way too big for them in a 4th dig (even batting first they'd struggle with against a good attack) that day was their 'once in a blue moon' :wink:
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby GWW » Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:03 pm

Than win in 01 was when Butcher made that ton??
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15675
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 816 times
Been liked: 166 times

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby am Bays » Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:11 pm

bulldogproud wrote:So you are admitting that in the last ten tests they have played against each other Australia have played for a draw once more than England have. Thanks, I rest my case. :wink:


What were you doing in Adelaide last year on days 4-5???

Perth on Day four??

Lords 2005 when we finally beat you halfway through day five.....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19615
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2082 times

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby bulldogproud » Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:17 pm

We were disguising the fact we were trying to win those games :wink:
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Location: West Beach
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 401 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:08 am

they were cruising earlier on today and going at a good run rate when i was watching
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60373
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13211 times
Been liked: 4508 times

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby RustyCage » Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:21 pm

Great run rate, 2.96 for the innings, and 3.8 for the last 10 overs. Cook 81 from 234 balls, strike rate of 34.61. Great positive English batting. Once were a joke, still nothing has changed. Might need to bring Boycott back to up the run rate.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15300
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1267 times
Been liked: 937 times

Re: why the poms are useless

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

they had a good run rate early on,
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60373
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13211 times
Been liked: 4508 times

Next

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |