by bayman » Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:14 am
by Dogwatcher » Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:17 am
by rod_rooster » Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:41 am
by jackpot jim » Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:53 pm
by stan » Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:01 pm
jackpot jim wrote:Points to Consider.
1/ Trying to SAVE the Game Doesn't Discount the Possibillity of Winning it.
2/ 341 runs more to win in 90 overs with 9 wkts in hand at a R/R of 3.80 on a 5th pitch against the World Record wicket Taker.
S.Lanka 1st Inngs R/R 3.15
S.Lanka 2nd Inngs R/R 3.40
England 1st Inngs R/R 3.01
Considering the Above Facts, I Consider the Statement made by the English Coach to be Appropriate.
by Strawb » Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:38 pm
by Pup » Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:06 pm
jackpot jim wrote:Points to Consider.
1/ Trying to SAVE the Game Doesn't Discount the Possibillity of Winning it.
2/ 341 runs more to win in 90 overs with 9 wkts in hand at a R/R of 3.80 on a 5th pitch against the World Record wicket Taker.
S.Lanka 1st Inngs R/R 3.15
S.Lanka 2nd Inngs R/R 3.40
England 1st Inngs R/R 3.01
Considering the Above Facts, I Consider the Statement made by the English Coach to be Appropriate.
by locky801 » Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:10 pm
by bayman » Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:47 pm
by bulldogproud » Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:52 am
rod_rooster wrote:Completetely agree. I'd prefer to lose the game trying to win it rather than just trying to play out a draw. Imagine the Aussies in the same situation. There is no way known they would be thinking anything other than winning the game.
by Mic » Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:44 pm
by am Bays » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:00 pm
bulldogproud wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Completetely agree. I'd prefer to lose the game trying to win it rather than just trying to play out a draw. Imagine the Aussies in the same situation. There is no way known they would be thinking anything other than winning the game.
Go back to the Ashes series of 2005. The Aussies were trying to save games then rather than win them. If anything England have had a far more positive approach to their game in recent times. That is why there were no draws in the 2006-07 Ashes series.
Cheers
by bulldogproud » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:18 pm
by bayman » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:20 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:bulldogproud wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Completetely agree. I'd prefer to lose the game trying to win it rather than just trying to play out a draw. Imagine the Aussies in the same situation. There is no way known they would be thinking anything other than winning the game.
Go back to the Ashes series of 2005. The Aussies were trying to save games then rather than win them. If anything England have had a far more positive approach to their game in recent times. That is why there were no draws in the 2006-07 Ashes series.
Cheers
We saved (played for a draw) in one game, Old Trafford. The other games we we actually tried to win and lost by 2 runs and 3 wickets respectively....
Go back the previous three series ther is no doubt who played the more atttractive cricket indeed the only test England won in 2001 was when we gifted them an easy chase down 330 with a full day to bat...
by GWW » Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:03 pm
by am Bays » Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:11 pm
bulldogproud wrote:So you are admitting that in the last ten tests they have played against each other Australia have played for a draw once more than England have. Thanks, I rest my case.
by bulldogproud » Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:17 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:08 am
by RustyCage » Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:21 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |