by wristwatcher » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:23 am
by dedja » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:23 am
by the joker » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:24 am
by carey » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:24 am
whufc wrote:Looked pretty similar to the one Watson didnt get yesterday
by carey » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:25 am
dedja wrote:Can't argue with that decision ...
the joker wrote:It's time for the middle order to stand up. Cowan needs 50+
by Jim05 » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:26 am
whufc wrote:Looked pretty similar to the one Watson didnt get yesterday
by bulldog2004 » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:26 am
whufc wrote:Looked pretty similar to the one Watson didnt get yesterday
by carey » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:26 am
by whufc » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:27 am
carey wrote:whufc wrote:Looked pretty similar to the one Watson didnt get yesterday
Yep umpires fault it's a 311 lead
by Jim05 » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:28 am
carey wrote:whufc wrote:Looked pretty similar to the one Watson didnt get yesterday
Yep umpires fault it's a 311 lead
by bulldog2004 » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:28 am
by whufc » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:28 am
by Q. » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:29 am
by wristwatcher » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:30 am
carey wrote:Jim05 wrote:Clipping leg by a 1000th of a mm.wristwatcher wrote:Alim you are the man, when the Poms need you. Your always there
8% of the ball you dog
Now Jim and Wristy as 2 blokes who understand the game come on are you 2 serious? Are you 2 telling me live you didn't think shit his in trouble here? Come on
by carey » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:31 am
whufc wrote:carey wrote:whufc wrote:Looked pretty similar to the one Watson didnt get yesterday
Yep umpires fault it's a 311 lead
I'm not saying that
Live it looked out no doubt, but I also thought the same about the one that was overturned yesterday, I would love to see them side by side.
I'm still very dubious about hawk eye and have made that call a fair bit
by RustyCage » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:31 am
whufc wrote:Looked pretty similar to the one Watson didnt get yesterday
by wristwatcher » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:32 am
by carey » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:33 am
wristwatcher wrote:We can't win this test. That last Rogers decision has made that clear
by whufc » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:33 am
by wristwatcher » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:34 am
carey wrote:wristwatcher wrote:We can't win this test. That last Rogers decision has made that clear
I think you can.
PS we beat Lockleys today huge win for us in the context of the season and bigger picture.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |