by wycbloods » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:41 pm
by mal » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:41 pm
by jackpot jim » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:41 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Hauritz is answering a few critics today. If he grabs a couple more he has well nd truly cemented his spot for a while.
by interested observer » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:42 pm
by Bum Crack » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:43 pm
by rod_rooster » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:44 pm
jackpot jim wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Hauritz is answering a few critics today. If he grabs a couple more he has well nd truly cemented his spot for a while.
Fair dinkum, Hauritz is a very AVERAGE spin bowler that gets lucky every now and then. In the team simply bcos of a lack of options. Bit like Peter Taylor years ago.
by jackpot jim » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:45 pm
mal wrote:CHOKERS are all out
GUL trys to hit the ball to TaSMANIA and is caught
YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOU
F...................................G
BEAUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUTY
by Pup » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:45 pm
jackpot jim wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Hauritz is answering a few critics today. If he grabs a couple more he has well nd truly cemented his spot for a while.
Fair dinkum, Hauritz is a very AVERAGE spin bowler that gets lucky every now and then. In the team simply bcos of a lack of options. Bit like Peter Taylor years ago.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:47 pm
by RoosterMarty » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:48 pm
by JK » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:49 pm
by rod_rooster » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:49 pm
Pup wrote:jackpot jim wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Hauritz is answering a few critics today. If he grabs a couple more he has well nd truly cemented his spot for a while.
Fair dinkum, Hauritz is a very AVERAGE spin bowler that gets lucky every now and then. In the team simply bcos of a lack of options. Bit like Peter Taylor years ago.
He is much improved.
Improving more and more with every game and deserves his spot in the side.
by jackpot jim » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:49 pm
rod_rooster wrote:jackpot jim wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Hauritz is answering a few critics today. If he grabs a couple more he has well nd truly cemented his spot for a while.
Fair dinkum, Hauritz is a very AVERAGE spin bowler that gets lucky every now and then. In the team simply bcos of a lack of options. Bit like Peter Taylor years ago.
Is it not possible to give credit where it's due JJ? Two 5 wicket hauls in his last 2 tests. I'd suggest there is more than just luck involved.
Great stuff from Hauritz despite his critics still clutching at straws to discredit him.
by rod_rooster » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:50 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Another great example of why no other form of cricket can ever rival Test Match cricket, still hard to believe todays events!!
by Brucetiki » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:50 pm
by spell_check » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:51 pm
by RoosterMarty » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:51 pm
jackpot jim wrote:rod_rooster wrote:jackpot jim wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Hauritz is answering a few critics today. If he grabs a couple more he has well nd truly cemented his spot for a while.
Fair dinkum, Hauritz is a very AVERAGE spin bowler that gets lucky every now and then. In the team simply bcos of a lack of options. Bit like Peter Taylor years ago.
Is it not possible to give credit where it's due JJ? Two 5 wicket hauls in his last 2 tests. I'd suggest there is more than just luck involved.
Great stuff from Hauritz despite his critics still clutching at straws to discredit him.
Blah Blah Blah F*****g Katich, North, Cullen, Kreza etc etc etc would all have got the same amount of wickets against those chokers, it's just that Hauritz had the opportuinty. also 5 wicket hauls have to be put into perspective, Cheap wickets by slogging tailenders with no talent are hardly well earned prized scalps.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:52 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Another great example of why no other form of cricket can ever rival Test Match cricket, still hard to believe todays events!!
Exactly right CP.
by RoosterMarty » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:53 pm
spell_check wrote:Try saying that century from Hussey was meaningless! Oh wait, we will use the Dutchy standard of judging players "it's only one century in a long time".![]()
One century which went a long way to sealing the series victory; here's to more in the future.
by rod_rooster » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:54 pm
jackpot jim wrote:rod_rooster wrote:jackpot jim wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Hauritz is answering a few critics today. If he grabs a couple more he has well nd truly cemented his spot for a while.
Fair dinkum, Hauritz is a very AVERAGE spin bowler that gets lucky every now and then. In the team simply bcos of a lack of options. Bit like Peter Taylor years ago.
Is it not possible to give credit where it's due JJ? Two 5 wicket hauls in his last 2 tests. I'd suggest there is more than just luck involved.
Great stuff from Hauritz despite his critics still clutching at straws to discredit him.
Blah Blah Blah F*****g Katich, North, Cullen, Kreza etc etc etc would all have got the same amount of wickets against those chokers, it's just that Hauritz had the opportuinty. also 5 wicket hauls have to be put into perspective, Cheap wickets by slogging tailenders with no talent are hardly well earned prized scalps.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |