by beeroclock » Sun Dec 09, 2012 9:58 am
by heater31 » Sun Dec 09, 2012 12:10 pm
beeroclock wrote:Certainly wont be enough kids to fill two u/16 and two u/14 sides across the board without a total raid on ATCA clubs and I can tell you the ATCA clubs have had a gut full of their home grown kids leaving as is.
Half of the kids now are not up to district standards and it will only get worse.
SA cricket is an un organised mess.
by beeroclock » Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:43 pm
heater31 wrote:beeroclock wrote:Certainly wont be enough kids to fill two u/16 and two u/14 sides across the board without a total raid on ATCA clubs and I can tell you the ATCA clubs have had a gut full of their home grown kids leaving as is.
Half of the kids now are not up to district standards and it will only get worse.
SA cricket is an un organised mess.
rumoured to be 1 16's team to go.
Don't see why the ATCA clubs are bitching because if their local grade club has a good structure they will receive excellent coaching and if they ATCA club plays their cards right will get the player back eventually. Might be at 17 years old or maybe 27 and a walk up A grader for them.
by heater31 » Sun Dec 09, 2012 9:15 pm
beeroclock wrote:heater31 wrote:beeroclock wrote:Certainly wont be enough kids to fill two u/16 and two u/14 sides across the board without a total raid on ATCA clubs and I can tell you the ATCA clubs have had a gut full of their home grown kids leaving as is.
Half of the kids now are not up to district standards and it will only get worse.
SA cricket is an un organised mess.
rumoured to be 1 16's team to go.
Don't see why the ATCA clubs are bitching because if their local grade club has a good structure they will receive excellent coaching and if they ATCA club plays their cards right will get the player back eventually. Might be at 17 years old or maybe 27 and a walk up A grader for them.
District clubs survive on revenue as do ATCA clubs.
You have just given a potential 10 year gap on returning to their grass roots .
Imagine that situation in the face of an ATCA club manager year in year out.
I'm sure you have limited understanding of how far the well is actually deep these days.
by Footy Smart » Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:04 am
beeroclock wrote:heater31 wrote:beeroclock wrote:Certainly wont be enough kids to fill two u/16 and two u/14 sides across the board without a total raid on ATCA clubs and I can tell you the ATCA clubs have had a gut full of their home grown kids leaving as is.
Half of the kids now are not up to district standards and it will only get worse.
SA cricket is an un organised mess.
rumoured to be 1 16's team to go.
Don't see why the ATCA clubs are bitching because if their local grade club has a good structure they will receive excellent coaching and if they ATCA club plays their cards right will get the player back eventually. Might be at 17 years old or maybe 27 and a walk up A grader for them.
District clubs survive on revenue as do ATCA clubs.
You have just given a potential 10 year gap on returning to their grass roots .
Imagine that situation in the face of an ATCA club manager year in year out.
I'm sure you have limited understanding of how far the well is actually deep these days.
by Bulls forever » Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:46 pm
by daysofourlives » Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:51 pm
Bulls forever wrote:You old boys can keep your grudge, that’s fine doesn’t really matter what a couple of key board warriors think. The facts of the present set up at TTGDCC which you conveniently haven’t acknowledged make your grudge defunct. So while you keep living in the past we will keep adding to the current and future batch of State players.
by Bulls forever » Mon Dec 17, 2012 8:37 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Bulls forever wrote:You old boys can keep your grudge, that’s fine doesn’t really matter what a couple of key board warriors think. The facts of the present set up at TTGDCC which you conveniently haven’t acknowledged make your grudge defunct. So while you keep living in the past we will keep adding to the current and future batch of State players.
To be fair to DOOL a keyboard warrior is harsh, probably one of the most qualified on this site when talking about grade cricket.
by heater31 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 8:46 pm
by daysofourlives » Mon Dec 17, 2012 9:03 pm
heater31 wrote:Moving on from the Northern Districts/Salisbury v TTG slanging match.....
apparently SACA has already selected squads for next season. They could be in for a rude shock when most of the players picked refuse to play in it. Yet to come across someone in Grade cricket (from several clubs mind you) that is for it.
by RustyCage » Mon Dec 17, 2012 9:37 pm
heater31 wrote:Moving on from the Northern Districts/Salisbury v TTG slanging match.....
apparently SACA has already selected squads for next season. They could be in for a rude shock when most of the players picked refuse to play in it. Yet to come across someone in Grade cricket (from several clubs mind you) that is for it.
by smac » Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:03 pm
by heater31 » Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:08 pm
smac wrote:Best interesting how many actually knock back an invitation to play.
by smac » Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:41 pm
by mickey » Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:40 pm
heater31 wrote:smac wrote:Best interesting how many actually knock back an invitation to play.
Why would Jason Borgas want to play? He has been in the system and was spat out, still easily one of the best batsmen at Grade level.
Jake Brown from Kensington is another.
Grade Cricket is the SANFL for Cricketers yet they are still amateurs trying to make it in a professional environment.
by MAY-Z » Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:53 am
pafc1870 wrote:heater31 wrote:Moving on from the Northern Districts/Salisbury v TTG slanging match.....
apparently SACA has already selected squads for next season. They could be in for a rude shock when most of the players picked refuse to play in it. Yet to come across someone in Grade cricket (from several clubs mind you) that is for it.
sad state of affairs if so many people playing the game don't want to represent our state.
by hawks21 » Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:45 pm
MAY-Z wrote:pafc1870 wrote:heater31 wrote:Moving on from the Northern Districts/Salisbury v TTG slanging match.....
apparently SACA has already selected squads for next season. They could be in for a rude shock when most of the players picked refuse to play in it. Yet to come across someone in Grade cricket (from several clubs mind you) that is for it.
sad state of affairs if so many people playing the game don't want to represent our state.
by whufc » Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:50 pm
by daysofourlives » Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:12 pm
hawks21 wrote:MAY-Z wrote:pafc1870 wrote:heater31 wrote:Moving on from the Northern Districts/Salisbury v TTG slanging match.....
apparently SACA has already selected squads for next season. They could be in for a rude shock when most of the players picked refuse to play in it. Yet to come across someone in Grade cricket (from several clubs mind you) that is for it.
sad state of affairs if so many people playing the game don't want to represent our state.
Your missing the point. It isnt a matter of not wanting to represent the state. Nearly every cricketer in SA would love to play for the Redbacks. It's about being realistic and knowing that the cricketers chances of playing for SA has past them. They would much rather play grade cricket with mates.
It will end up being an under 23 competition with a few fringe State players in each side.
by Dogmatic » Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:17 am
pafc1870 wrote:heater31 wrote:Moving on from the Northern Districts/Salisbury v TTG slanging match.....
apparently SACA has already selected squads for next season. They could be in for a rude shock when most of the players picked refuse to play in it. Yet to come across someone in Grade cricket (from several clubs mind you) that is for it.
sad state of affairs if so many people playing the game don't want to represent our state.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |