by mal » Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:02 pm
by Pup » Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:24 pm
by rod_rooster » Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:43 pm
by Pup » Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:59 pm
by Pup » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:00 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Pietersen really struggling this series. Can't say i am not enjoying it to be honest
by rod_rooster » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:25 pm
Pup wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Pietersen really struggling this series. Can't say i am not enjoying it to be honest
152 @ 38.
He just can't seem to go with the job lately. I know his coming back from injury but it's an interesting time in KP's career.
by CoverKing » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:33 pm
by Pup » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:48 pm
CoverKing wrote:Bell i do not rate one bit.
1- he has only made his test tons, when another batsman have.
2- his test tons have been when he has come to the wicket on the following scores "4/297, 3/117, 3/140, 4/219, 4/192, 4/288, 4/321, 2/39, 2/105"
3- that shows to me, he is a flat track bully and only came in at 2/39 (and can argue 3/117) when his side needed him to stand up.
Yes his technique looks good, but the short ball scares the carp out of him everytime! This game the sherminator must stand up
by rod_rooster » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:55 pm
Pup wrote:CoverKing wrote:Bell i do not rate one bit.
1- he has only made his test tons, when another batsman have.
2- his test tons have been when he has come to the wicket on the following scores "4/297, 3/117, 3/140, 4/219, 4/192, 4/288, 4/321, 2/39, 2/105"
3- that shows to me, he is a flat track bully and only came in at 2/39 (and can argue 3/117) when his side needed him to stand up.
Yes his technique looks good, but the short ball scares the carp out of him everytime! This game the sherminator must stand up
I don't know about that. I would argue that anytime your side is 4 for less than 200 especially when your tail is as brittle as England's have been since Bell started playing then your side is in need.
by CoverKing » Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:20 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Pup wrote:CoverKing wrote:Bell i do not rate one bit.
1- he has only made his test tons, when another batsman have.
2- his test tons have been when he has come to the wicket on the following scores "4/297, 3/117, 3/140, 4/219, 4/192, 4/288, 4/321, 2/39, 2/105"
3- that shows to me, he is a flat track bully and only came in at 2/39 (and can argue 3/117) when his side needed him to stand up.
Yes his technique looks good, but the short ball scares the carp out of him everytime! This game the sherminator must stand up
I don't know about that. I would argue that anytime your side is 4 for less than 200 especially when your tail is as brittle as England's have been since Bell started playing then your side is in need.
I'd also argue that he shouldn't be coming in when they are 3 or 4 down. He should be at 3 or 4 IMO. I mean seriously, Trott?
by CoverKing » Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:22 pm
by dedja » Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:23 pm
CoverKing wrote:Front runner = Ian Bell ...
by rod_rooster » Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:24 pm
CoverKing wrote:And Pup, being 4 fa less then 200 therefore adds one more hundred when his side needed it! Not a flattering set of stats for Bell IMO
by CoverKing » Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:25 pm
by brod » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:04 pm
by CoverKing » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:05 pm
by NFC » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:18 pm
by CoverKing » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:24 pm
NFC wrote:Game over I reckon, Saffers well on top.
by CoverKing » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:19 am
by CoverKing » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:28 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |