by whufc » Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:35 pm
by OnSong » Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:37 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:39 pm
whufc wrote:so u listen to sledging when you bat do you.
by RustyCage » Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:39 pm
by OnSong » Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:44 pm
by whufc » Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:59 pm
OnSong wrote:When did this become about sledging.
by OnSong » Wed Nov 14, 2012 4:09 pm
by whufc » Wed Nov 14, 2012 4:11 pm
OnSong wrote:I sat here contemplating my response, reading through your fundamentally flawed argument and then I realised, I can't win.
Sure, I'm undoubtedly superior with English and despite sound argument against your point of view, from more than one poster I might add, you keep coming back for more.
You don't quit.
You want it more.
You win.
And there ends the example of how the mental edge works. Thank you, and good night.
by Media Park » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:48 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by The Dark Knight » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:53 pm
Media Park wrote:We need a mental disintegration thread to see which poster is the best (I'm backing REB or PG in).
For what it's worth, I see two changes in each side for the next Test.
Australia: Rob Quiney and Ben Hilfenhaus out, Shane Watson (if fit, otherwise Usman Khawaja) and Mitchell Starc in
Rob Quiney was the best available, but long term prospect Khawaja ripped out a great ton, and is the only Aussie that does not want Watto to pull up fit. Watto of course would be straight back in for Quiney if fit. Hilfenhaus was ordinary, no question, and the next best choice is Starc.
South Africa: JP Duminy (injury) and Klienveldt out, Faf Du Plessis and Imran Tahir in
Tahir is a spud of the highest order, and Clarke will rape his bowling, but you need a specialist spinner in the long batting innings that King William Oval produce (and Klienveldt was shit), and Du Plessis was the back up batsman originally, and is also a handy bowler.
by whufc » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:02 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:Media Park wrote:We need a mental disintegration thread to see which poster is the best (I'm backing REB or PG in).
For what it's worth, I see two changes in each side for the next Test.
Australia: Rob Quiney and Ben Hilfenhaus out, Shane Watson (if fit, otherwise Usman Khawaja) and Mitchell Starc in
Rob Quiney was the best available, but long term prospect Khawaja ripped out a great ton, and is the only Aussie that does not want Watto to pull up fit. Watto of course would be straight back in for Quiney if fit. Hilfenhaus was ordinary, no question, and the next best choice is Starc.
South Africa: JP Duminy (injury) and Klienveldt out, Faf Du Plessis and Imran Tahir in
Tahir is a spud of the highest order, and Clarke will rape his bowling, but you need a specialist spinner in the long batting innings that King William Oval produce (and Klienveldt was shit), and Du Plessis was the back up batsman originally, and is also a handy bowler.
That he will.
Fingers crossed watson will be fit. Agreed with you there MP- Hilf out Starc in.
by Jim05 » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:10 pm
by Media Park » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:12 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Pup » Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:22 pm
Media Park wrote:Showed a graphic of his career
average 50 without the gloves
average 30 with them
obviously a shorter period keeping, but 20 runs less is huge.
by CoverKing » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:09 am
by Johno6 » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:16 am
by CoverKing » Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:48 am
Johno6 wrote:IMO Hilfy is a good short game bowler, dont rate him in the longer games as much.
by Johno6 » Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:53 am
Rik E Boy wrote:mal wrote:South Africa should not be disappointed
Most touring teams are usually 0-1 down after the Gabba Tests
In racing terms , South Africa will be better for the run
IF is an intangible word
But what IF Michael Clarke was out cheap and AU ends up being about 4/50
I reckon SA would have romped in
This is a crock of shit because Horses don't have to worry about pyschological advantage. The Saffers surrended this mental initiative when their run rate died in the ar5e during the middle session on day three. Instead of trying to make something happen the scoring dried up under pressure and they didn't look like trying to win the game after that.
After four sessions I was a worried fan as I thought 'these blokes are number one and they are all over us'. By the end of day three I was thinking 'Smith lacks belief'. If I sensed that, you can beat your bottom gold coin that Pup and Arthurs did too. Remember how England batted us out of that Gabba test a few years ago and maintained that mental edge? South Africa didn't do that and all that 'the run' might have achieved is a dimishing of the aura they had started to build up around themselves after beating England and being 3/333 in Australia.
regards,
REB
by mal » Thu Nov 15, 2012 4:15 pm
by MightyEagles » Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:51 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |