by Lightning McQueen » Sun Jan 01, 2023 10:11 pm
by Senor Moto Gadili » Sun Jan 01, 2023 10:20 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Jan 02, 2023 8:25 am
by DOC » Mon Jan 02, 2023 10:00 am
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:I agree that the rule is flawed in that allows Neser to do what he did, but maybe the flaw in the rule comes before that. Neser completed the catch before he ran over the rope, so that should be enough. Catch completed with feet on ground before crossing the rope = out.
by Armchair expert » Mon Jan 02, 2023 10:06 am
DOC wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:I agree that the rule is flawed in that allows Neser to do what he did, but maybe the flaw in the rule comes before that. Neser completed the catch before he ran over the rope, so that should be enough. Catch completed with feet on ground before crossing the rope = out.
Food for thought.
We never had this issue when the fence was the boundary.
Lightning McQueen wrote:You're a legend
by am Bays » Mon Jan 02, 2023 10:09 am
DOC wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:I agree that the rule is flawed in that allows Neser to do what he did, but maybe the flaw in the rule comes before that. Neser completed the catch before he ran over the rope, so that should be enough. Catch completed with feet on ground before crossing the rope = out.
Food for thought.
We never had this issue when the fence was the boundary.
by whufc » Mon Jan 02, 2023 10:33 am
by DOC » Mon Jan 02, 2023 10:45 am
by stampy » Mon Jan 02, 2023 11:41 am
whufc wrote:No WHS team is going to let players go sliding into concrete gutters and metal fences.
by heater31 » Mon Jan 02, 2023 11:55 am
Brad Young....stampy wrote:whufc wrote:No WHS team is going to let players go sliding into concrete gutters and metal fences.
with good reason, go ask ricky ponting
by Senor Moto Gadili » Mon Jan 02, 2023 12:07 pm
heater31 wrote:Brad Young....stampy wrote:whufc wrote:No WHS team is going to let players go sliding into concrete gutters and metal fences.
with good reason, go ask ricky ponting
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Jan 02, 2023 12:28 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:I agree that the rule is flawed in that allows Neser to do what he did, but maybe the flaw in the rule comes before that. Neser completed the catch before he ran over the rope, so that should be enough. Catch completed with feet on ground before crossing the rope = out.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Jan 02, 2023 12:31 pm
whufc wrote:No WHS team is going to let players go sliding into concrete gutters and metal fences.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Mon Jan 02, 2023 1:28 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:I agree that the rule is flawed in that allows Neser to do what he did, but maybe the flaw in the rule comes before that. Neser completed the catch before he ran over the rope, so that should be enough. Catch completed with feet on ground before crossing the rope = out.
if the catch was completed then why the clown act??
by whufc » Mon Jan 02, 2023 1:43 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:whufc wrote:No WHS team is going to let players go sliding into concrete gutters and metal fences.
there is padding that can be used if its such an issue.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Jan 02, 2023 1:53 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:I agree that the rule is flawed in that allows Neser to do what he did, but maybe the flaw in the rule comes before that. Neser completed the catch before he ran over the rope, so that should be enough. Catch completed with feet on ground before crossing the rope = out.
if the catch was completed then why the clown act??
You may have missed my point. The Laws of cricket dictate that Neser didn't initially complete the catch which is why he had to do the "clown act" to complete it. In my view he clearly took the catch and then took 2 steps before crossing the line. I'm suggesting that the Law could be changed such that Neser's catch is deemed to be completed before he crossed the line and therefore the clown act is unnecessary. BTW, this silly law applies to all cricket, not just T20 games.
by whufc » Mon Jan 02, 2023 1:57 pm
by RB » Mon Jan 02, 2023 2:22 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:i dont think he had completed the catch.
if that was a catch then so was the one in the 99 WC Semi Final.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Jan 02, 2023 2:34 pm
whufc wrote:Personally I think once the player steps foot over the boundary they are ‘out of play’ until they re-enter the field.
They touch it whilst out of play it’s a six
by stampy » Mon Jan 02, 2023 5:52 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:whufc wrote:Personally I think once the player steps foot over the boundary they are ‘out of play’ until they re-enter the field.
They touch it whilst out of play it’s a six
Correct
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |