Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 9:47 amNicko Marsh FFS, Pattison and O'Keefe added to squad.
BoundaryRider84 wrote:Nicko Marsh FFS, Pattison and O'Keefe added to squad.
WTF does Klinger have to do FFS?!?!
SA Footy
SANFL
http://www.safooty.net/forum/
Aus. v NZ - Test Series / Shaun Marsh Appreciation Thread
Page 27 of 42
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 9:47 amRe: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 9:49 amWTF does Klinger have to do FFS?!?!
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 9:53 amBoundaryRider84 wrote:Nicko Marsh FFS, Pattison and O'Keefe added to squad.
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 9:53 amMarsh, meanwhile, returns to the side for the first time since the fateful Trent Bridge Test of this year's Ashes series, having scored consistently if not prolifically for Western Australia in the interim. Marsh was always likely to be next in line for Khawaja, and none of his competitors have been able to do anything outstanding to usurp him.
"Shaun was unlucky to miss out on the squad for the first two Tests and since then has scored consistently in the Sheffield Shield," Marsh said, "so we believe he deserves this opportunity."
Shaun Marsh 32yrs old.
Recent scores:
64 & 33
2 & 92
15 & 1
11 v NZ
10
Michael Klinger 35yrs old.
Recent scores:
70 & 23
4 & 16
202no & 50no
48
31
64
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:05 am"Marsh was always likely to be next in line for Khawaja, and none of his competitors have been able to do anything outstanding to usurp him."
- runs.JPG (67.48 KiB) Viewed 1031 times
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:07 ammarsh and patto, marsh had has his chance numerous times and patto is a lemon like cummins
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:08 amdunk or bancroft would make more sense
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:12 amQ. wrote:BoundaryRider84 wrote:Nicko Marsh FFS, Pattison and O'Keefe added to squad.
I hope he fails miserably and I hope we lose.
Absolute garbage.
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:13 amZartan wrote:BoundaryRider84 wrote:Nicko Marsh FFS, Pattison and O'Keefe added to squad.
WTF does Klinger have to do FFS?!?!
Age is against him unfortunately, they won't play him and Voges in the same side. Marsh isn't the answer though, blood another newbie like Carters or Bancroft and bat them at 4
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:14 amIt's beyond a joke now, even he must be embarrassed that he gets such a free ride.
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:15 amMitch Marsh would want to lift his game or Agar will take his spot.
Pattison def in. Hopefully stay fit.
Batting wise, who knows.Everyone wants someone different.
If Bancroft comes in, he has to open, so Burns could go to 4.
Pattison def in. Hopefully stay fit.
Batting wise, who knows.Everyone wants someone different.
If Bancroft comes in, he has to open, so Burns could go to 4.
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:17 amWhy the love for Bancroft, apart from 111 against SA, his next best shield score is 25, also against SA.
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:29 amhelicopterking wrote:Mitch Marsh would want to lift his game or Agar will take his spot.
Pattison def in. Hopefully stay fit.
Batting wise, who knows.Everyone wants someone different.
If Bancroft comes in, he has to open, so Burns could go to 4.
Agar ain't going to replace Mitch Marsh, they have brought SOK into the squad as second spin option so that shows that Agar isn't in the mix
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:32 amCarters and Dunk would go ok. Nicker Marsh in the squad, the kiwi slippers are warming there hands up.
Bowling wise. Patterson in my opinion. I just hope his body is up to it.
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
Bowling wise. Patterson in my opinion. I just hope his body is up to it.
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:33 amMr Beefy wrote:Why the love for Bancroft, apart from 111 against SA, his next best shield score is 25, also against SA.
why shaun marsh??
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:34 amstampy wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Why the love for Bancroft, apart from 111 against SA, his next best shield score is 25, also against SA.
why shaun marsh??
banger also performed well on the A tour
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:36 amJim05 wrote:Zartan wrote:BoundaryRider84 wrote:Nicko Marsh FFS, Pattison and O'Keefe added to squad.
WTF does Klinger have to do FFS?!?!
Age is against him unfortunately, they won't play him and Voges in the same side. Marsh isn't the answer though, blood another newbie like Carters or Bancroft and bat them at 4
It's absolute horse shit, you play the best, most balanced XI going around at the time.
Rogers and Voges were no spring chickens and Marsh is getting well on in age too.
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:38 amstan wrote:Carters and Dunk would go ok. Nicker Marsh in the squad, the kiwi slippers are warming there hands up.
Bowling wise. Patterson in my opinion. I just hope his body is up to it.
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
Pattinson wont last the 5 days unfortunately, promises the world but delivers atlas's.
On that note though, it's hard to weigh up the bowling pecking order nowadays.
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:43 amMr Beefy wrote:Why the love for Bancroft, apart from 111 against SA, his next best shield score is 25, also against SA.
Have a look at his record last year, then the A tour.
Re: Australia v NZ - Test Series
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:44 amJim05 wrote:Zartan wrote:BoundaryRider84 wrote:Nicko Marsh FFS, Pattison and O'Keefe added to squad.
WTF does Klinger have to do FFS?!?!
Age is against him unfortunately, they won't play him and Voges in the same side. Marsh isn't the answer though, blood another newbie like Carters or Bancroft and bat them at 4
Agree, but with Smith at 4.