Chuck Wepner wrote:scoob wrote:Chuck Wepner wrote:The only problem is, we are seriously lacking young batting talent in this country. Even Khawaja hasn't really earned his spot yet and he is probably the pick of them... I think Hussey, Haddin and Ponting still add value & their experience shouldn't just be thrown away all at once.
A lot of people said David Warner hadn't proved his worth yet either. But maybe you have a point - retain either ponting or hussey at 5/6 and promote Cowan and bring back watto and Marsh... Its ok to go full on young with the bowling line up but we need to continue with only experience batsmen? Why?
Hussey and Ponting are two of the best fielders in world cricket. Both are proven batsmen currently out of form - doesn't mean they won't regain it. I remember just over 12 months ago the same great Aussie knockers were calling for Hussey's head - he was easily our best batsman only last summer. If they are to be replaced, it must be by a player who is in outstanding 1st class form - Australian Test sides should not be selected on the basis of age - Warner is a must keep and the bowling looks ok. We must keep at least one or two proven, experienced batsmen or India will embarrass us !
Embarass us?!?!?!?!? I would think getting trashed 3-1 at home by a team that hadn't won a series in Australia for 20+ years is an embarassment, getting bowled out for 47 then losing by 8 wickets after leading on the first innings is an embarassment, getting beaten on our home deck by the 8th rank test playing national, who haven't won a test in Australia for 20+ years is an embarassment... these blokes are getting embarassed constantly. But why change? Why give the young guys a go when the older players are doing so well? These youngs blokes have really struggled since they have been given a chance - Marsh, Lyon, Cummings, Pattison, Warner...
