Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:12 pmFFS
guaranteed to lose the remaining matches of the season
guaranteed to lose the remaining matches of the season
Page 24 of 37
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:12 pmRe: Sack Chuck
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 1:51 pmgot the banana benders on the ropes ffs....
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 5:46 pmFfs chuck slipped up on the banana peel
Sacked
Sacked
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 5:47 pm471!!
Enforce the follow on FFS!!!!
Enforce the follow on FFS!!!!
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 6:09 pmCACK SHUCK FFS
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:53 amCan't believe we lost there's only 1 appropriate response.
SACK CHUCK FFS!!!!!!!!
SACK CHUCK FFS!!!!!!!!
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 5:39 pmTwo terrible results since Chuck re-signed FFS!!!
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 5:53 pmBAN JIM05 FFS!!!
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 6:34 pm他媽的的緣故
Tā mā de de yuángù
Tā mā de de yuángù
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:12 pmSACK CHUCK - cant take 20 wickets
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 5:32 pmFFS
get it right
SACK CHUCK FFS!!!
get it right
SACK CHUCK FFS!!!
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 12:17 amOh FFS
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 12:12 pmSurely he should have his contract extended for 10 years as we wont finish bottom this year 
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:11 pmFfs
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:14 pmHow many points have we got since the muppets contract was extended FFS!!!
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:19 pmHonestly a 4th place finish this season just ain't gonna cut it.
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:01 pmSS ladder
26 SA....1.1485
26 WA..1.0521
26 NS ..1.0505
22 QL ...1.1240
Yeah lets give the coach the sack
26 SA....1.1485
26 WA..1.0521
26 NS ..1.0505
22 QL ...1.1240
Yeah lets give the coach the sack
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:15 pmmal wrote:SS ladder
26 SA....1.1485
26 WA..1.0521
26 NS ..1.0505
22 QL ...1.1240
Yeah lets give the coach the sack
The ladder on cricinfo and cricket.com.au has WA top and SA 2nd. Presumably because WA have won 4 outrights compared to our 3, despite being a lower quotient. Anyone know the specifics? I always thought it was as mal has it here.
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:23 pmAerie wrote:mal wrote:SS ladder
26 SA....1.1485
26 WA..1.0521
26 NS ..1.0505
22 QL ...1.1240
Yeah lets give the coach the sack
The ladder on cricinfo and cricket.com.au has WA top and SA 2nd. Presumably because WA have won 4 outrights compared to our 3, despite being a lower quotient. Anyone know the specifics? I always thought it was as mal has it here.
We are second.
Quotient is only used to split sides who are level on wins.
WA are top due to winning more games outright
Re: Sack Chuck
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:34 pmJim05 wrote:Aerie wrote:mal wrote:SS ladder
26 SA....1.1485
26 WA..1.0521
26 NS ..1.0505
22 QL ...1.1240
Yeah lets give the coach the sack
The ladder on cricinfo and cricket.com.au has WA top and SA 2nd. Presumably because WA have won 4 outrights compared to our 3, despite being a lower quotient. Anyone know the specifics? I always thought it was as mal has it here.
We are second.
Quotient is only used to split sides who are level on wins.
WA are top due to winning more games outright
Thanks. So we can lean towards hoping NSW beat WA, provided we beat Tassie.