Page 3 of 3

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 6:59 pm
by Coach Bombay
Tom pooper at the moment

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 1:40 am
by LBT
Whilst the media focussed on Clarke and the NSW test players, there's no doubt that Phillip Hughes death has impacted on Tom Cooper the most.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 8:51 am
by Stumps
LBT wrote:Whilst the media focussed on Clarke and the NSW test players, there's no doubt that Phillip Hughes death has impacted on Tom Cooper the most.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



there's no doubt ?.....
dare say you wouldnt know but he hasnt made runs for a while I agree

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 1:56 pm
by Coach Bombay
just lost 3/13

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 2:12 pm
by westcoastpanther
Coach Bombay wrote:just lost 3/13


Ferg with a pair of 80's, just can't convert. Very frustrating, for him as well no doubt...

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 2:34 pm
by Coach Bombay
westcoastpanther wrote:
Coach Bombay wrote:just lost 3/13


Ferg with a pair of 80's, just can't convert. Very frustrating, for him as well no doubt...


I'd take his performances any day at the moment.

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 4:01 pm
by Grahaml
Be pretty happy making 80s every time, but he's spent most of his career not getting as many runs as he should. Not that much more work in a 120 compared to an 80 for these blokes but the difference to the outcome of the match is huge. He's not quite at the point where his chance for national duties is in the past but he's getting pretty close to being written off. He may well look back at his career and say it was simply not enough runs on the good days that stood between him and a solid test career.

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 4:10 pm
by westcoastpanther
Grahaml wrote:Be pretty happy making 80s every time, but he's spent most of his career not getting as many runs as he should. Not that much more work in a 120 compared to an 80 for these blokes but the difference to the outcome of the match is huge. He's not quite at the point where his chance for national duties is in the past but he's getting pretty close to being written off. He may well look back at his career and say it was simply not enough runs on the good days that stood between him and a solid test career.


Agree entirely, needs to cash in and make selectors take notice, 80's don't do that

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 5:35 pm
by Jim05
WA won by 8 wickets, Klinger hit the winning runs and ended up 51no

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 5:46 pm
by Aerie
Grahaml wrote:Be pretty happy making 80s every time, but he's spent most of his career not getting as many runs as he should. Not that much more work in a 120 compared to an 80 for these blokes but the difference to the outcome of the match is huge. He's not quite at the point where his chance for national duties is in the past but he's getting pretty close to being written off. He may well look back at his career and say it was simply not enough runs on the good days that stood between him and a solid test career.


Spot on. Especially the last sentence. Is in career best form, and has been for a couple of seasons now, but lack of huge scores to demand a baggy green and boost that average has given selectors an out to choose someone else. There is probably a few batsman around the country in the same boat in his generation.

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:37 pm
by westozfalcon
Adam Voges has registered four centuries since his 35th birthday.

Who says you don't get better with age? :)

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:09 pm
by Grahaml
Aerie wrote:
Grahaml wrote:Be pretty happy making 80s every time, but he's spent most of his career not getting as many runs as he should. Not that much more work in a 120 compared to an 80 for these blokes but the difference to the outcome of the match is huge. He's not quite at the point where his chance for national duties is in the past but he's getting pretty close to being written off. He may well look back at his career and say it was simply not enough runs on the good days that stood between him and a solid test career.


Spot on. Especially the last sentence. Is in career best form, and has been for a couple of seasons now, but lack of huge scores to demand a baggy green and boost that average has given selectors an out to choose someone else. There is probably a few batsman around the country in the same boat in his generation.


Definitely lacking the blokes up the pointy end of the averages but overall it's still a super tough comp. We don't tend to tolerate blokes who average under 40 for long and 50 is still seen as a benchmark. Compare that to England and blokes can have a long career and be seen as highly successful and average low 30s. I reckon having only 6 first class sides has proven a massive benefit to Australian cricket over a long time. End result is a bit of navel gazing over blokes knocking the leather around at 42 instead of 52. Lol.

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2015 1:25 pm
by Coach Bombay
Kane Richardson has been suspended for 1 match

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2015 6:38 pm
by locky801
Coach Bombay wrote:Kane Richardson has been suspended for 1 match


Why

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2015 6:41 pm
by heater31
locky801 wrote:
Coach Bombay wrote:Kane Richardson has been suspended for 1 match


Why

http://www.cricket.com.au/news/south-au ... 2015-02-11

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:20 pm
by Eagles2014
locky801 wrote:
Coach Bombay wrote:Kane Richardson has been suspended for 1 match


Why


Besides the verbal abuse, there were other claims of ball tampering. When questioned by the umpires, he responded with the standard big headed "Do you know who I am ". Think he got what he deserved by the sounds of it!

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:43 pm
by heater31
Eagles2014 wrote:
locky801 wrote:
Coach Bombay wrote:Kane Richardson has been suspended for 1 match


Why


Besides the verbal abuse, there were other claims of ball tampering. When questioned by the umpires, he responded with the standard big headed "Do you know who I am ". Think he got what he deserved by the sounds of it!

Entire team was warned regarding throwing the ball into the ground to rough it up. A tirade of abuse was heard to becoming from deep backward square. Someone else carried on like a pork chop from inside the ring, this one went on to take the final wicket to win the game. Richardson went without a wicket.

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 12:49 pm
by Rik E Boy
Grahaml wrote:
Aerie wrote:
Grahaml wrote:Be pretty happy making 80s every time, but he's spent most of his career not getting as many runs as he should. Not that much more work in a 120 compared to an 80 for these blokes but the difference to the outcome of the match is huge. He's not quite at the point where his chance for national duties is in the past but he's getting pretty close to being written off. He may well look back at his career and say it was simply not enough runs on the good days that stood between him and a solid test career.


Spot on. Especially the last sentence. Is in career best form, and has been for a couple of seasons now, but lack of huge scores to demand a baggy green and boost that average has given selectors an out to choose someone else. There is probably a few batsman around the country in the same boat in his generation.


Definitely lacking the blokes up the pointy end of the averages but overall it's still a super tough comp. We don't tend to tolerate blokes who average under 40 for long and 50 is still seen as a benchmark. Compare that to England and blokes can have a long career and be seen as highly successful and average low 30s. I reckon having only 6 first class sides has proven a massive benefit to Australian cricket over a long time. End result is a bit of navel gazing over blokes knocking the leather around at 42 instead of 52. Lol.


The ball swings a lot in Blighty. Aussie tracks are roads these days. Apples and Oranges mate.

regards,

REB

Re: Western Australia v South Australia 7/2 - 11/2

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 1:45 pm
by heater31
Rik E Boy wrote:
Grahaml wrote:
Aerie wrote:
Grahaml wrote:Be pretty happy making 80s every time, but he's spent most of his career not getting as many runs as he should. Not that much more work in a 120 compared to an 80 for these blokes but the difference to the outcome of the match is huge. He's not quite at the point where his chance for national duties is in the past but he's getting pretty close to being written off. He may well look back at his career and say it was simply not enough runs on the good days that stood between him and a solid test career.


Spot on. Especially the last sentence. Is in career best form, and has been for a couple of seasons now, but lack of huge scores to demand a baggy green and boost that average has given selectors an out to choose someone else. There is probably a few batsman around the country in the same boat in his generation.


Definitely lacking the blokes up the pointy end of the averages but overall it's still a super tough comp. We don't tend to tolerate blokes who average under 40 for long and 50 is still seen as a benchmark. Compare that to England and blokes can have a long career and be seen as highly successful and average low 30s. I reckon having only 6 first class sides has proven a massive benefit to Australian cricket over a long time. End result is a bit of navel gazing over blokes knocking the leather around at 42 instead of 52. Lol.


The ball swings a lot in Blighty. Aussie tracks are roads these days. Apples and Oranges mate.

regards,

REB

Also 12 more first class teams in England with the talent spread a lot thinner.

I have a Pommy mate I got to know through cricket here down under, a keeper that will play Division 1 County Championship this coming season. Been playing first class cricket since he was 17 and if he was an Aussie would only play 2nd XI here and be an excellent Grade player. If he continues to develop he is touted to be an English Lions (England A) or a back up to the ODI/Test teams.