by dedja » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:09 pm
by CENTURION » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:10 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:10 pm
stampy wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:stampy wrote:the bowler knew he hit it, would you call that cheating?
Nope.
knew you wouldnt let me down!
by stampy » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:11 pm
by dedja » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:11 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:12 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:12 pm
by MAY-Z » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:12 pm
CENTURION wrote:another reason why every decision should be reviewed, if it's not out, call him back as he is walking off.
by stampy » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:13 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:stampy wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:stampy wrote:the bowler knew he hit it, would you call that cheating?
Nope.
knew you wouldnt let me down!
Whats wrong stampy? Dan Murphy stuff you around again?
by locky801 » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:13 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Hopefully by the time the 2015 world cup comes around, scores below 200 will be a winning score.
by jackpot jim » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:14 pm
dedja wrote:News laws in play ... the bat is now part of your pads.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:14 pm
by dedja » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:15 pm
by CENTURION » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:15 pm
MAY-Z wrote:CENTURION wrote:another reason why every decision should be reviewed, if it's not out, call him back as he is walking off.
by MAY-Z » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:15 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:This is what someone posted on cricinfo.
Dave Angel: "Actually, Clarke could hold himself responsible for Warner's dismissal. DRS was designed to correct decisions like the one Warner got, the absolute howlers, not the "maybe, was it? I'm not sure" ones like Clarke got. If teams continue to gamble with DRS, situations like this will keep occurring. Clarke abused DRS and his team has now paid the price."
by MAY-Z » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:17 pm
CENTURION wrote:MAY-Z wrote:CENTURION wrote:another reason why every decision should be reviewed, if it's not out, call him back as he is walking off.
Good idea, we will get about 12 overs an hour in
no we won't, as the batsman is walking off, review it!
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:17 pm
CENTURION wrote:MAY-Z wrote:CENTURION wrote:another reason why every decision should be reviewed, if it's not out, call him back as he is walking off.
Good idea, we will get about 12 overs an hour in
no we won't, as the batsman is walking off, review it!
by stampy » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:17 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |