LBW law

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Re: LBW law

Postby stampy » Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:35 am

i dont need to learn anything, DRS in relation to lbw decisions is flawed, end of story ffs
Go The Tiges!!!
stampy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9018
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has liked: 75 times
Been liked: 364 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach

Re: LBW law

Postby Ron Burgundy » Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:45 am

No shit. But do you want an overhaul of the LBW law? Or do you want an overhaul of DRS?

Make up your mind ;)
Ron Burgundy
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1741
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 9:52 pm
Has liked: 174 times
Been liked: 137 times

Re: LBW law

Postby stampy » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:03 pm

both!!!!!!!!!!!
Go The Tiges!!!
stampy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9018
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has liked: 75 times
Been liked: 364 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach

Re: LBW law

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:05 pm

Try baseball. Might be more to your liking.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: LBW law

Postby stampy » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:22 pm

everyone has an opinion, you got a problem with that obviously
Go The Tiges!!!
stampy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9018
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has liked: 75 times
Been liked: 364 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach

Re: LBW law

Postby CENTURION » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:23 pm

there you go, Clarke out, didn't refer, appeal should have instigated the DRS.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: LBW law

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:35 pm

Sri Lanka had the option to refer ans didn't. What's the problem?
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: LBW law

Postby CENTURION » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:43 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sri Lanka had the option to refer ans didn't. What's the problem?

the umpire maybe didn't give it out because of the DRS in place. he probably thought, that's bloody close, surely they will ask for a review? I feel that without the DRS he would have given it, so either use the DRS for all appeals, or piss it off.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: LBW law

Postby Squids » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:48 pm

Bloody 87
Image
User avatar
Squids
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7539
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:47 pm
Location: mod city
Has liked: 28 times
Been liked: 205 times
Grassroots Team: Ports

Re: LBW law

Postby CENTURION » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:49 pm

Squids wrote:Bloody 87

so what? when does it turn up? I can't remember the last time. put it this way, more batsmen get out on other numbers. ;)
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: LBW law

Postby Dogmatic » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:55 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:How is an umpire expected to make the right call when a leggie is going around the wicket?

The same way he is expected to make any other decision.
For every one I miss I am closer to a hole in one.
Dogmatic
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2055
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 8:26 pm
Location: 19th hole
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 32 times
Grassroots Team: Brahma Lodge

Re: LBW law

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:57 pm

CENTURION wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sri Lanka had the option to refer ans didn't. What's the problem?

the umpire maybe didn't give it out because of the DRS in place. he probably thought, that's bloody close, surely they will ask for a review? I feel that without the DRS he would have given it, so either use the DRS for all appeals, or piss it off.

Lot of ifs and maybes there. Obviously the umpire thought it wasn't out.
Would rather get rid of drs than review every appeal. What would happen in India when there are 2-3 appeals every over.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: LBW law

Postby CENTURION » Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:00 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
CENTURION wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sri Lanka had the option to refer ans didn't. What's the problem?

the umpire maybe didn't give it out because of the DRS in place. he probably thought, that's bloody close, surely they will ask for a review? I feel that without the DRS he would have given it, so either use the DRS for all appeals, or piss it off.

Lot of ifs and maybes there. Obviously the umpire thought it wasn't out.
Would rather get rid of drs than review every appeal. What would happen in India when there are 2-3 appeals every over.

yes, get rid of the DRS. now, I'm going to The Bath.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: LBW law

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:01 pm

Dogmatic wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:How is an umpire expected to make the right call when a leggie is going around the wicket?

The same way he is expected to make any other decision.

The rule as it stands is easily judged.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: LBW law

Postby daysofourlives » Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:34 pm

CENTURION wrote:there you go, Clarke out, didn't refer, appeal should have instigated the DRS.


So if Clarke dances 3 metres down the wicket and gets hit on the pad and its going onto hit according to DRS you want it given out
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019
Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
daysofourlives
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11835
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:35 pm
Has liked: 2580 times
Been liked: 1750 times
Grassroots Team: Angaston

Re: LBW law

Postby daysofourlives » Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:35 pm

stampy wrote:everyone has an opinion, you got a problem with that obviously


No just your opinion

I thought i was wrong once but i was mistaken ;)
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019
Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
daysofourlives
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11835
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:35 pm
Has liked: 2580 times
Been liked: 1750 times
Grassroots Team: Angaston

Re: LBW law

Postby stampy » Fri Jan 04, 2013 3:51 pm

daysofourlives wrote:
stampy wrote:everyone has an opinion, you got a problem with that obviously


No just your opinion

I thought i was wrong once but i was mistaken ;)


nah TSG has a problem with others opinions as well ;)
Go The Tiges!!!
stampy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9018
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has liked: 75 times
Been liked: 364 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach

Re: LBW law

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Fri Jan 04, 2013 3:58 pm

Not really. If you do have an opinion, you shouldn't get upset if someone disagrees. That's the important thing. It would be boring if everyone thought the same way. Unless it was my way. The world would be awesome.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: LBW law

Postby mal » Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:53 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:Not really. If you do have an opinion, you shouldn't get upset if someone disagrees. That's the important thing. It would be boring if everyone thought the same way. Unless it was my way. The world would be awesome.


Quote by The Sniping Giant :
If you have an opinion , you should'nt get upset if someone disagrees :roll:
Coming from you what a crock of s..t



In at least the last FEW years you have disagreed with me or ridiculed many many posts of mine
Some I deserved , yeah I can admit that, thats part of my posting style

Ask yourself this
How many times have you agreed with anything Ive posted , or complimented any post of mine ?



Of late Ive been adopting your style , biting back at you
After a FEW days , Im wearisome of this approach , Ive just about had it
I dont get much pleasure out of attempts to belittle you
Stooping to your level is shamefool
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29744
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 1996 times
Been liked: 1966 times

Re: LBW law

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:06 pm

Whatever mal. At least I'm not getting any pain in the arse pm's from you. You can always use the block feature. I don't mind. :lol:

Say g'day too that other sook for me.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |