
by mal » Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:21 pm
by mal » Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:23 pm
by Dogwatcher » Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:25 pm
by bulldogs » Mon Nov 19, 2007 1:40 pm
by mal » Mon Nov 19, 2007 1:45 pm
by smac » Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:19 pm
mal wrote:13468 RUNS AT 54-52 PURA CUP
25628 RUNS AT 57-79 FIRST CLASS CAREER
1798 RUNS AT 44-95 TESTS
Now thats a career.
1999 Highlight hitting the winning runs in the World Cup.
by Dogwatcher » Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:22 pm
by silicone skyline » Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:30 pm
mal wrote:YOU CAN ONLY CONSIDER AVERAGES IN THE CURRENT ERAS OF PLAYING.
TO COMPARE AVERAGES FROM ONE ERA TO ANOTHER CAN BE MISLEADING
by locky801 » Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:42 pm
youngster wrote:And as an added attraction for you Rooster fans, Barrie Robran is also on the bill...
by redden whites » Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:30 pm
silicone skyline wrote:Considering Hookes pretty much instigated the new attacking brand of batting in test cricket
by spell_check » Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:55 pm
by Hondo » Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:57 pm
redden whites wrote:silicone skyline wrote:Considering Hookes pretty much instigated the new attacking brand of batting in test cricket
Oh Please...................................... while averaging 34 and a single century against a test minnow of the time. Respect the mans contribution to SA cricket in particular but dont insult us with this tripe please....Omg
by Aerie » Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:04 pm
by GWW » Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:06 pm
by rod_rooster » Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:27 pm
silicone skyline wrote:mal wrote:YOU CAN ONLY CONSIDER AVERAGES IN THE CURRENT ERAS OF PLAYING.
TO COMPARE AVERAGES FROM ONE ERA TO ANOTHER CAN BE MISLEADING
This is where the whole hookes/lehmann argument sits.
Considering Hookes pretty much instigated the new attacking brand of batting in test cricket, i believe hookes shaped Darren into the player he has been.
It's interesting to note that while you can claim bowlers were better in Clem Hill's time, what was the standard of the bowlers when Bradman avergaed 99.04??
Where they THAT piss poor?
No.
Bradman was that good.
Whether your opposition is craphouse or not i find it irrelevant, making one 200 against bangladesh needs luck, to average 99.04, or 45 or whatever, is a reflection of how good you were, how patient and focussed you were, for a solid period of time.
This is where Lehmann shades Hookes IMHO.
He was dashing and daring but consistent, Hookes was dashing, daring, spectacular, just not as consistent as Lehmann.
Averaging 45 in Test Cricket is no mean feat, i think you have to respect that, no matter what era you play in.
by mal » Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:05 am
by woodwt » Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:36 pm
by Dogwatcher » Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:42 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |