Jim05 wrote:The No Show spuds it up as per usual.
Back to grade cricket you Hack
Excellent post


by rod_rooster » Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:03 pm
Jim05 wrote:The No Show spuds it up as per usual.
Back to grade cricket you Hack
by dedja » Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:10 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:14 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:15 pm
by Johno6 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:24 pm
by PPLions » Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:31 pm
by stan » Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:37 pm
by Johno6 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:38 pm
PPLions wrote:Australia likely to go into the record books as the first team EVER to declare and still lose by an innings
by Dog_ger » Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:45 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:07 pm
PPLions wrote:Australia likely to go into the record books as the first team EVER to declare and still lose by an innings
by robranisgod » Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:15 pm
Jim05 wrote:PPLions wrote:Australia likely to go into the record books as the first team EVER to declare and still lose by an innings
We are apparantly the first side ever to declare in the first innings and lose
by tigermad » Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:28 pm
by Sky Pilot » Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:57 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:57 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 6:01 pm
by Sky Pilot » Tue Mar 05, 2013 6:02 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:All is not lost. If Australia start picking the team on the best available instead of trying too be cute.
Instead of picking 3 allrounders(1 who can't bowl) and a wicketkeeper at 6 , pick a side that Australia has had success with. That means your best 6 batsman, best wicketkeeper and 4 best bowlers. Time to keep it simple.
The other thing Australia should be doing, is picking a side of test cricketers. I know some people won't like it, but Warner Watson, Maxwell and Doherty aren't test cricketers, and never will be. They would be my first picks in 20/20 though.
by Jim05 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 6:04 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 6:06 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:All is not lost. If Australia start picking the team on the best available instead of trying too be cute.
Instead of picking 3 allrounders(1 who can't bowl) and a wicketkeeper at 6 , pick a side that Australia has had success with. That means your best 6 batsman, best wicketkeeper and 4 best bowlers. Time to keep it simple.
The other thing Australia should be doing, is picking a side of test cricketers. I know some people won't like it, but Warner Watson, Maxwell and Doherty aren't test cricketers, and never will be. They would be my first picks in 20/20 though.
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Mar 05, 2013 6:06 pm
by Rik E Boy » Tue Mar 05, 2013 6:19 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:All is not lost. If Australia start picking the team on the best available instead of trying too be cute.
Instead of picking 3 allrounders(1 who can't bowl) and a wicketkeeper at 6 , pick a side that Australia has had success with. That means your best 6 batsman, best wicketkeeper and 4 best bowlers. Time to keep it simple.
The other thing Australia should be doing, is picking a side of test cricketers. I know some people won't like it, but Warner Watson, Maxwell and Doherty aren't test cricketers, and never will be. They would be my first picks in 20/20 though.
You are probably on the money here. IMO T20 has ruined cricket. I really hate it even though I aknowledge we are being force fed the bloody form to keep up with the rest of the world.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |