by stampy » Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:06 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:00 pm
stampy wrote:hey OL you there???????????????
FFS!!
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:41 am
stampy wrote:damn! what'd he do?
by whufc » Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:59 pm
by carey » Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:01 pm
whufc wrote:I think its about time this thread changed to..................
Sack Inverarity!!!
At least Chuck would have no problems playing two spinners.
by Jim05 » Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:04 pm
whufc wrote:I think its about time this thread changed to..................
Sack Inverarity!!!
At least Chuck would have no problems playing two spinners.
by whufc » Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:05 pm
carey wrote:whufc wrote:I think its about time this thread changed to..................
Sack Inverarity!!!
At least Chuck would have no problems playing two spinners.
Chuck would blow in his pants and play about 6 spinners if he seen this deck!
by whufc » Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:07 pm
Jim05 wrote:whufc wrote:I think its about time this thread changed to..................
Sack Inverarity!!!
At least Chuck would have no problems playing two spinners.
Im leading the sack Micky brigade, Saffer wanker
by Jim05 » Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:20 pm
whufc wrote:carey wrote:whufc wrote:I think its about time this thread changed to..................
Sack Inverarity!!!
At least Chuck would have no problems playing two spinners.
Chuck would blow in his pants and play about 6 spinners if he seen this deck!
He would have
1. Warner
2. Clarke
3. D.Hussey
4. C.White
5. S.Smith
6. Maxwell
7. Wade
8. Lyon
9. Doherty
10. Beer
11. Ahmed
![]()
![]()
![]()
by Jim05 » Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:21 pm
whufc wrote:Jim05 wrote:whufc wrote:I think its about time this thread changed to..................
Sack Inverarity!!!
At least Chuck would have no problems playing two spinners.
Im leading the sack Micky brigade, Saffer wanker
Im not sure how it works but how much say does Micky have in selection, if he was part of the genius 1 spinner plan than he can pack his bags as well.
This team was doomed before a bowl had been bowled!
by whufc » Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:26 pm
by Brodlach » Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:53 pm
whufc wrote:carey wrote:whufc wrote:I think its about time this thread changed to..................
Sack Inverarity!!!
At least Chuck would have no problems playing two spinners.
Chuck would blow in his pants and play about 6 spinners if he seen this deck!
He would have
1. Warner
2. Clarke
3. D.Hussey
4. C.White
5. S.Smith
6. Maxwell
7. Wade
8. Lyon
9. Doherty
10. Beer
11. Ahmed
![]()
![]()
![]()
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by heater31 » Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:58 pm
Brodlach wrote:Where's Cullen Bailey?
by Rik E Boy » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:00 pm
whufc wrote:Throw a saffie and a western australian together and when spin gets mentioned they think your talking about the post match press confrence.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:05 am
by stampy » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:11 am
by Rik E Boy » Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:56 pm
stampy wrote:what does flummoxed mean ffs!!
by locky801 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |