The Sleeping Giant wrote:Don't think Australia will enforce the follow on anyway.
Correct
We dont want to face Swann on the last day on this pitch.
Hopefully we can set them 350-400 chase on the last day
by Jim05 » Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:19 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Don't think Australia will enforce the follow on anyway.
by tigerpie » Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:30 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:51 pm
tigerpie wrote:Clarke wont enforce the follow on. We'll bat england out of the game hopefully then see how they go batting on a worn wicket.
Lyon just has no luck..how many times has he created a chance only for the end result not be a wicket. He must take wickets for us to win.
by Aerie » Sun Aug 04, 2013 2:58 pm
by Aerie » Sun Aug 04, 2013 3:00 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:tigerpie wrote:Clarke wont enforce the follow on. We'll bat england out of the game hopefully then see how they go batting on a worn wicket.
Lyon just has no luck..how many times has he created a chance only for the end result not be a wicket. He must take wickets for us to win.
He never has any luck. Is it because he isn't good enough? Balls too many loose balls for an offie also.
by beeroclock » Sun Aug 04, 2013 5:54 pm
Bum Crack wrote:beeroclock wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Was just thinking this could be it for Lyon. You can't be unlucky all the time.
Agreed.
If he's the best spinner in Aust then there must be some shockers around.
Get the lad from Para Hills he takes a truck load of wickets every year.
Hes a spud.
by FlyingHigh » Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:58 pm
Interceptor wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:The Poms over-rate was a disgrace on the yesterday.
26 overs in both the first two sessions, so 12 overs short over a 6 hour day and still 5-6 short with the extra half hour. Not as if there were heaps of wickets falling or balls being fetched from oustide the ground. Slowed the Aussies batting down and then the Poms got the advantage of not having to face the last two overs of the day even though the Aussies had bowled 30 in roughly 2 hours.
When it is so blatant that is was one team's fault yesterday, the umpires should give the opposition the option of playing out the overs if they wish. Plus the idea that Ian Chappell has proposed for years and suspend the captain if a team is a serial offender.
Already happens, not sure if anyone has missed Test matches yet, but Sri Lanka captain Angelo Matthews was suspended (by Boonie!) for slow rates in a recent ODI series.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/tri-nation-west-indies-2013/content/story/650653.html
by Aerie » Sun Aug 04, 2013 8:10 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Interceptor wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:The Poms over-rate was a disgrace on the yesterday.
26 overs in both the first two sessions, so 12 overs short over a 6 hour day and still 5-6 short with the extra half hour. Not as if there were heaps of wickets falling or balls being fetched from oustide the ground. Slowed the Aussies batting down and then the Poms got the advantage of not having to face the last two overs of the day even though the Aussies had bowled 30 in roughly 2 hours.
When it is so blatant that is was one team's fault yesterday, the umpires should give the opposition the option of playing out the overs if they wish. Plus the idea that Ian Chappell has proposed for years and suspend the captain if a team is a serial offender.
Already happens, not sure if anyone has missed Test matches yet, but Sri Lanka captain Angelo Matthews was suspended (by Boonie!) for slow rates in a recent ODI series.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/tri-nation-west-indies-2013/content/story/650653.html
Yeah, I knew it had happened in one-dayers, but would cause a huge stir if it happened in tests. THought maybe a Paki's player had been suspended as well?
Mind you, the Aussies weren't great yesterday, but far beter than the Poms on day two.
by the back pocket » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:02 pm
by dedja » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:02 pm
by carey » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:31 pm
by Aerie » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:36 pm
carey wrote:I think Aust need to get the wicket more so quickly than cheaply as they'll need time to bat to get a total big enough that it can't be run down yet leave them selves enough time to try and bowl England out again.
Nothing but a draw for mine.
by beeroclock » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:45 pm
by dedja » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:52 pm
by carey » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:54 pm
beeroclock wrote:Warner needs to open the bat and get on with it.
by beeroclock » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:56 pm
carey wrote:beeroclock wrote:Warner needs to open the bat and get on with it.
Treat the middle session as a One Dayer and have a crack and knocking England over you reckon?
Trouble is it looks a good deck to bat on so rolling England in a day might be an issue....
by heater31 » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:57 pm
beeroclock wrote:Warner needs to open the bat and get on with it.
by beeroclock » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:59 pm
heater31 wrote:beeroclock wrote:Warner needs to open the bat and get on with it.
Ran off the field once the last wicket fell. Either opening in place of Rogers or he needed to take a dump!
by dedja » Sun Aug 04, 2013 10:06 pm
by beeroclock » Sun Aug 04, 2013 10:08 pm
dedja wrote:We're trying to win the match ... makes sense to keep Watto as far away from the action as possible.
Warner just needs to treat this like aT20 innings.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |