by Pup » Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:47 pm
by Pumba » Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:47 pm
by hearts on fire » Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:48 pm
by FD88 » Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:49 pm
by Pup » Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:49 pm
Pumba wrote:batsmen always seem to get the rough end of the umpiring stick when they are in abd form too. poor haydos! who was the umpire? they may cost him a test spot....
by locky801 » Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:50 pm
hearts on fire wrote:It all just seems to be happening to Hayden though, why can't it happen to one of the lower order batsmen or South Africa.
If they proceed to drop Hayden, i will f****** kill the selectors.
by hearts on fire » Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:50 pm
by FD88 » Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:51 pm
locky801 wrote:hearts on fire wrote:It all just seems to be happening to Hayden though, why can't it happen to one of the lower order batsmen or South Africa.
If they proceed to drop Hayden, i will f****** kill the selectors.
They will give him one last chance one would think after that decision
by Brock Landers » Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:52 pm
hearts on fire wrote:If i was Hayden, i would just sit in a corner and cry...... i would feel totally gutted and depressed.
I feel for you Hayden, don't lie down and don't feel no shame.
I love you no matter what.
by Brock Landers » Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:54 pm
FD88 wrote:locky801 wrote:hearts on fire wrote:It all just seems to be happening to Hayden though, why can't it happen to one of the lower order batsmen or South Africa.
If they proceed to drop Hayden, i will f****** kill the selectors.
They will give him one last chance one would think after that decision
Yeah for sure. I'm still in shock here. Cannot believe it.
by hearts on fire » Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:56 pm
by FD88 » Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:58 pm
by panther » Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:16 pm
by Rik E Boy » Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:23 pm
by rod_rooster » Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:25 pm
by Brock Landers » Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:27 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Hayden was plumb when on zero and then later given out incorrectly. There are two consistent factors, poor umpiring and he's just not hitting the ball, in attack or defence. In Adelaide he looked the goods despite not making runs but today he looked miles off being a test player.
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:30 pm
Brock Landers wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Hayden was plumb when on zero and then later given out incorrectly. There are two consistent factors, poor umpiring and he's just not hitting the ball, in attack or defence. In Adelaide he looked the goods despite not making runs but today he looked miles off being a test player.
regards,
REB
I thought he looked good in the first innings before he got out, but did look very scratchy today. Extra pressure maybe......
by Gozu » Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:37 pm
by MAY-Z » Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:37 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Hayden was plumb when on zero and then later given out incorrectly. There are two consistent factors, poor umpiring and he's just not hitting the ball, in attack or defence. In Adelaide he looked the goods despite not making runs but today he looked miles off being a test player.
regards,
REB
by locky801 » Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:42 pm
rod_rooster wrote:WowI have just seen the replay of the decision. I was out at the time and now i see what all the fuss is about. You would see a decision that poor from a 90 year old umpire in parklands cricket. I'm absolutely gobsmaked
![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |