SA Footy

NSW copping some awful decisions from the umpires.

Anyway up the ‘Backs’!!

RB wrote:Renshaw and Kurt Patterson are players who - for some reason - I'd like to see back in the test team eventually. But they definitely need big runs.

Renshaw obliged against the Vics.

Patterson had two failures against us. He probably wouldn't have too many chances left even for NSW on form for the last couple of seasons, even though he's still 30.

Patterson had three poor seasons in a row now, was dropped from NSW team late last season He is finished I think. Bancroft and Renshaw fighting for the opening spot. Henry Hunt been ordinary since being talked up for that spot, lucky nobody putting any pressure on him from below.

norwood8 wrote:NSW copping some awful decisions from the umpires.

Anyway up the ‘Backs’!!

The umps want early minute tomorrow too

Eagles2014 wrote:

norwood8 wrote:NSW copping some awful decisions from the umpires.

Anyway up the ‘Backs’!!

The umps want early minute tomorrow too

They got golf booked tomorrow

Off the top of my head Australia A test side

Bancroft
Renshaw
Whiteman
Hardie
McSweeney
Turner
Inglis
Neser
Steketee
Richardson
Murphy

I've probably missed a lot of people so no hate please

Play the extra 30mins tonight cos we're likely to take the last 5 wickets in a blink of an eye

Oh boy the Gilkes decision was a stinker

Armchair expert wrote:Oh boy the Gilkes decision was a stinker

Sangha one worse

They need 230 runs. We need 5 wickets.

Right in the balance this one.

It's a bad era for batsmen to get hit on the pads
I've noticed for many years now umpires have been very generous in giving LBWs
Back in the 1970s, 1980s LBWs were very hard to get And you'd hardly ever get one bowling from around the wicket but these days it seems you can bowl around the wicket from as wide as possible and as long as it hits the batsman somewhere close to in front it seems you're GONE
It almost seems if umpires have been told to take the angles out of decision ,making
Umpiring isn't easy and we can all sit back in the comfort of our chairs and watch replay after replay but i feel the umpires need to find an in between balance between the 80s and recent times. Has there been a batsman this match that hasn't stood their ground for about 5 seconds in disbelief after being fired LBW ?

Banking Hughes and Edwards to put on a decent partnership here unfortunately

Booney wrote:They need 230 runs. We need 5 wickets.

Right in the balance this one.

In the balance ?

Reckon the odds would be something like
SA $1.06
NSW $10

But yes we are talking about the Redbacks here arnt we

Eagles2014 wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:Oh boy the Gilkes decision was a stinker

Sangha one worse

He was plumb

if the stumps were 15cm taller

jackpot jim wrote:

Booney wrote:They need 230 runs. We need 5 wickets.

Right in the balance this one.

In the balance ?

Reckon the odds would be something like
SA $1.06
NSW $10

But yes we are talking about the Redbacks here arnt we

There you go.

jackpot jim wrote:

Booney wrote:They need 230 runs. We need 5 wickets.

Right in the balance this one.

In the balance ?

Reckon the odds would be something like
SA $1.06
NSW $10

But yes we are talking about the Redbacks here arnt we [emoji38]

Close..


Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk

Very handy wicket right on stumps for the day.

jackpot jim wrote:It's a bad era for batsmen to get hit on the pads
I've noticed for many years now umpires have been very generous in giving LBWs
Back in the 1970s, 1980s LBWs were very hard to get And you'd hardly ever get one bowling from around the wicket but these days it seems you can bowl around the wicket from as wide as possible and as long as it hits the batsman somewhere close to in front it seems you're GONE
It almost seems if umpires have been told to take the angles out of decision ,making
Umpiring isn't easy and we can all sit back in the comfort of our chairs and watch replay after replay but i feel the umpires need to find an in between balance between the 80s and recent times. Has there been a batsman this match that hasn't stood their ground for about 5 seconds in disbelief after being fired LBW ?

In fairness I think DRS has taught us and the umpires over the last ten years that some of those going down legs probably never were

I think for years we probably overstated the angle we all umpired off.

Yes I believe technology is more accurate than what us humans presumed would happening if the ball passed the pads.

Armchair expert wrote:Off the top of my head Australia A test side

Bancroft
Renshaw
Whiteman
Hardie
McSweeney
Turner
Inglis
Neser
Steketee
Richardson
Murphy

I've probably missed a lot of people so no hate please

No Lehmann or Stobo?

Queensland win smashing Victoria by an innings and 104 runs.
Vic second innings 144
Handscomb 43
Swepson 5/39

WA v Tasmania, stumps day three.
WA 6/437, trail by 2 runs
Whiteman 188

The Dark Knight wrote:Queensland win smashing Victoria by an innings and 104 runs.
Vic second innings 144
Handscomb 43
Swepson 5/39

WA v Tasmania, stumps day three.
WA 6/437, trail by 2 runs
Whiteman 188

nothing unusal for that to happen up in brissy in october