SMA - the lies now start to surface

[bulldogproud2]

"We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," said McLachlan during the SACA's

All I can do is leave that with you.

Mclachlan never stated we will lose a test without the developement. HE stated "We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," I cant see where he says dependant on whether we get 4/5 tests stated anywhere

Now BP (this threads kickinit) is it not possible that after being promised we will NEVER lose a test again.

That Adelaide could go next summer without a test. YES OR NO ??????

Yes, it is, but it would not be as a result of the redevelopment. The redevelopment actually increases the chances of Adelaide being chosen as one of the four test venues.
As stated before, you have to HAVE something to be able to lose it. Your way of looking at things is akin to saying 'I lost a million dollars tonight because I did not win X-Lotto'.
If Adelaide does not host a test in 2014/15, it is because we never would have, it would not be 'lost as a result of the redevelopment'. Therefore, McLachlan did not lie in this case. It is also possible that Melbourne, Sydney, Perth, Brisbane or Hobart may go without hosting a test - for example, if a bomb blew the stadium up prior to the test. This is not a fault of the managers of the stadium, nor would Adelaide not hosting a test next year be a result of the redevelopment.

I am afraid that you just don't seem to get it, UKFan. The redevelopment is in NO WAY connected to the possibility of Adelaide not hosting a test in 2014/15. Conversely, the redevelopment is what may actually gain Adelaide the test - it would certainly be a favourable factor anyway.

Look, I don't particularly like Ian McLachlan plus I see some problems with the stadium, particularly in relation to parking. However, we can't call McLachlan a lier if Adelaide Oval misses a test in 2014/15.

Don't quite agree with the reference to 'kickinit' by the way. I think you will find that the vast majority of people who read our posts will agree with my logic on this one. Sorry, mate

[UK Fan]

"We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," said McLachlan during the SACA's

All I can do is leave that with you.

Mclachlan never stated we will lose a test without the developement. HE stated "We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," I cant see where he says dependant on whether we get 4/5 tests stated anywhere

Now BP (this threads kickinit) is it not possible that after being promised we will NEVER lose a test again.
[
That Adelaide could go next summer without a test. YES OR NO ??????

Yes, it is, but it would not be as a result of the redevelopment. The redevelopment actually increases the chances of Adelaide being chosen as one of the four test venues.
As stated before, you have to HAVE something to be able to lose it. Your way of looking at things is akin to saying 'I lost a million dollars tonight because I did not win X-Lotto'.
If Adelaide does not host a test in 2014/15, it is because we never would have, it would not be 'lost as a result of the redevelopment'. Therefore, McLachlan did not lie in this case. It is also possible that Melbourne, Sydney, Perth, Brisbane or Hobart may go without hosting a test - for example, if a bomb blew the stadium up prior to the test. This is not a fault of the managers of the stadium, nor would Adelaide not hosting a test next year be a result of the redevelopment.

I am afraid that you just don't seem to get it, UKFan. The redevelopment is in NO WAY connected to the possibility of Adelaide not hosting a test in 2014/15. Conversely, the redevelopment is what may actually gain Adelaide the test - it would certainly be a favourable factor anyway.

Look, I don't particularly like Ian McLachlan plus I see some problems with the stadium, particularly in relation to parking. However, we can't call McLachlan a lier if Adelaide Oval misses a test in 2014/15.

Don't quite agree with the reference to 'kickinit' by the way. I think you will find that the vast majority of people who read our posts will agree with my logic on this one. Sorry, mate

All I can state is your interpretation of Mclachlans quote is as bad as your interpretation that any single human being would believe your story.


Until you can find me a quote from mclachlan where he states "with The redevelopment it actually increases the chances of Adelaide being chosen as one of the four test venues" as opposed to "We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," which as the polar opposite of each other .

I'm sorry but the comparison to kickinit is apt. U have a notion in your head that simply doesn't exist and no matter how many times its pointed out you just keep regurgitating that stupid theory no matter what.

IF ADELAIDE misses out on a test next summer you can bet your aish I and other sacs members will be calling mclachlan a liar. As he clearly stated we will never miss one.

[bulldogproud2]

"We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," said McLachlan during the SACA's

All I can do is leave that with you.

Mclachlan never stated we will lose a test without the developement. HE stated "We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," I cant see where he says dependant on whether we get 4/5 tests stated anywhere

Now BP (this threads kickinit) is it not possible that after being promised we will NEVER lose a test again.
[
That Adelaide could go next summer without a test. YES OR NO ??????

Yes, it is, but it would not be as a result of the redevelopment. The redevelopment actually increases the chances of Adelaide being chosen as one of the four test venues.
As stated before, you have to HAVE something to be able to lose it. Your way of looking at things is akin to saying 'I lost a million dollars tonight because I did not win X-Lotto'.
If Adelaide does not host a test in 2014/15, it is because we never would have, it would not be 'lost as a result of the redevelopment'. Therefore, McLachlan did not lie in this case. It is also possible that Melbourne, Sydney, Perth, Brisbane or Hobart may go without hosting a test - for example, if a bomb blew the stadium up prior to the test. This is not a fault of the managers of the stadium, nor would Adelaide not hosting a test next year be a result of the redevelopment.

I am afraid that you just don't seem to get it, UKFan. The redevelopment is in NO WAY connected to the possibility of Adelaide not hosting a test in 2014/15. Conversely, the redevelopment is what may actually gain Adelaide the test - it would certainly be a favourable factor anyway.

Look, I don't particularly like Ian McLachlan plus I see some problems with the stadium, particularly in relation to parking. However, we can't call McLachlan a lier if Adelaide Oval misses a test in 2014/15.

Don't quite agree with the reference to 'kickinit' by the way. I think you will find that the vast majority of people who read our posts will agree with my logic on this one. Sorry, mate

All I can state is your interpretation of Mclachlans quote is as bad as your interpretation that any single human being would believe your story.


Until you can find me a quote from mclachlan where he states "with The redevelopment it actually increases the chances of Adelaide being chosen as one of the four test venues" as opposed to "We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," which as the polar opposite of each other .

I'm sorry but the comparison to kickinit is apt. U have a notion in your head that simply doesn't exist and no matter how many times its pointed out you just keep regurgitating that stupid theory no matter what.

IF ADELAIDE misses out on a test next summer you can bet your aish I and other sacs members will be calling mclachlan a liar. As he clearly stated we will never miss one.

UKFan, as Bulls Forever also stated, sadly your logic is impossible to follow.
Your logic would also state that if, in any season, there was no team touring Australia over our summer, Adelaide would have 'lost' a test. Your logic also is along the lines that Central lost today because we had no game.

You can only lose something if you firstly possess it. Adelaide possesses a test when there are at least five in a season. When there are only four, only Melbourne and Sydney are guaranteed of holding a test. No other city can say that they will host one with any certainty until the draw is released by Cricket Australia. Just try and think things through a bit more clearly, my friend.

You may also need to take reading lessons. Nowhere have I stated that Ian McLachlan said that the development actually increases the chances of Adelaide holding a test next year. That was firmly my opinion I stated. I did not attribute it at all to Mr. McLachlan.

As for no one agreeing with my logic, please read the posts above from Bulls Forever and Heater31. They both have supported my logic. No one has supported yours.

If Adelaide does host a test in 2014/15, I await your personal apology to Mr. McLachlan

See me one day at the football and I will personally set you up with a remedial reading tutor
Cheers

[RustyCage]

I swear UK Fan is related to kickinit!

[RustyCage]

There is a big difference in missing a Test once off because of a shortened schedule, and actually losing the Test match.

[bulldogproud2]

UKFan, just one question I would love to ask you to put this to a close:

Do you honestly, in your heart of hearts, believe that Adelaide has less of a chance of hosting a test in the 2014/15 season as a result of the redevelopment???

If not, then ...

Cheers.

[bulldogproud2]

.

[jackpot jim]

population has a lot to play in determining that too. Sadly, we have only the fifth highest population so we really should be in number five spot. What we have to do is go out there and make lots of babies!!!

Cheers

WHY should Adelaide be 5th cab off the rank???

Doesn't Adelaide consistently have the 3rd best attendances behind Melb and Syd ?

[UK Fan]

I swear UK Fan is related to kickinit!

I swear you are nugget Reece !!

[bulldogproud2]

population has a lot to play in determining that too. Sadly, we have only the fifth highest population so we really should be in number five spot. What we have to do is go out there and make lots of babies!!!

Cheers

WHY should Adelaide be 5th cab off the rank???

Doesn't Adelaide consistently have the 3rd best attendances behind Melb and Syd ?

From the statistics that I saw, it would appear that whilst Adelaide is in front of Perth in attendances, it is behind Brisbane. Brisbane invariably, particularly in the first three days of tests' generates crowds in excess of Adelaide's capacity of 31,000. What is in Perth's favour re their claim for hosting a test is that the WACA tests generates large television viewing audiences as the final session is during eastern coast primetime viewing hours.

No matter what, I think that very few people would support the notion that the redevelopment of Adelaide Oval actually reduces the chances of us hosting a test. If anything, it surely enhances it.

Cheers

[UK Fan]

"We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," said McLachlan during the SACA's

All I can do is leave that with you.

Mclachlan never stated we will lose a test without the developement. HE stated "We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," I cant see where he says dependant on whether we get 4/5 tests stated anywhere

Now BP (this threads kickinit) is it not possible that after being promised we will NEVER lose a test again.

That Adelaide could go next summer without a test. YES OR NO ??????

UK Fan, very frustrating argument, cannot understand your logic. If there are 4 tests, MCG, SCG will get two, that leaves Gabba, Waca, Adel and Bellrieve to get the other two. It might be Adelaide it might not, as CA does the programming prior to the start of the season and if there are only 4 tests per summer, it goes to reason it will be on a rotational basis.

Enough of that, I am not a fan of Mclaughlan.

I think your issue is, firstly you believed McLaughlan - politician, now you are believing Richard Earle - a journalist. If life has taught me one thing, it is do not believe a politician or a journalist, the truth lies in probably 10% of what they say or write, just filter the 90% of bulls..t, that pads their presentation.

I never believed mclachlan and stated all along he was lying thru his teeth. We were told we were being paranoid. And now when we want to keep our president accountable we have tards talking about "you see when we have 4 tests" which is irrelevant.

This entire thread is about promises made by Mclachlan/saca that were lies. Not is the development going to increase/ decrease the chance of Adelaide retaining a test if its a 4 test series like some incredibly unintelligent posters are making out.

The point is Mclachlan should never of made the statement "We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," to his members knowing full we had a 4 test summer coming out and Adelaide is never guaranteed a test when that occurs.

Ie. mclachlan made another promise to saca members he can't keep

Title of thread btw ???

Bdp I don't care what you think. All I care about is saca keeping its promises to its members.

Which it clearly HASN'T on this occasion

[UK Fan]

population has a lot to play in determining that too. Sadly, we have only the fifth highest population so we really should be in number five spot. What we have to do is go out there and make lots of babies!!!

Cheers

WHY should Adelaide be 5th cab off the rank???

Doesn't Adelaide consistently have the 3rd best attendances behind Melb and Syd ?

Ratings.

[bulldogproud2]

"We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," said McLachlan during the SACA's

All I can do is leave that with you.

Mclachlan never stated we will lose a test without the developement. HE stated "We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," I cant see where he says dependant on whether we get 4/5 tests stated anywhere

Now BP (this threads kickinit) is it not possible that after being promised we will NEVER lose a test again.

That Adelaide could go next summer without a test. YES OR NO ??????

UK Fan, very frustrating argument, cannot understand your logic. If there are 4 tests, MCG, SCG will get two, that leaves Gabba, Waca, Adel and Bellrieve to get the other two. It might be Adelaide it might not, as CA does the programming prior to the start of the season and if there are only 4 tests per summer, it goes to reason it will be on a rotational basis.

Enough of that, I am not a fan of Mclaughlan.

I think your issue is, firstly you believed McLaughlan - politician, now you are believing Richard Earle - a journalist. If life has taught me one thing, it is do not believe a politician or a journalist, the truth lies in probably 10% of what they say or write, just filter the 90% of bulls..t, that pads their presentation.

I never believed mclachlan and stated all along he was lying thru his teeth. We were told we were being paranoid. And now when we want to keep our president accountable we have tards talking about "you see when we have 4 tests" which is irrelevant.

This entire thread is about promises made by Mclachlan/saca that were lies. Not is the development going to increase/ decrease the chance of Adelaide retaining a test if its a 4 test series like some incredibly unintelligent posters are making out.

The point is Mclachlan should never of made the statement "We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," to his members knowing full we had a 4 test summer coming out and Adelaide is never guaranteed a test when that occurs. Ie. mclachlan made another promise to saca members he can't keep

Title of thread btw ???

Bdp I don't care what you think. All I care about is saca keeping its promises to its members.

Which it clearly HASN'T on this occasion

Thanks for finally seeing the light and backing up our comments, even though you did not realise you had. If, as we all agree, a four test summer never guarantees a test for Adelaide Oval, then it is not a case of the test being lost if one is not held in 2014/15. Please tell me how you can lose something you never possessed?????? Can you not see that very simple logic???? The test can only be lost if it otherwise would have been held. You have stated it may not have been held anyway, so you now agree it is not a case of LOSING it.
Hallelujah!!!!!!!!!!!!

As for lack of intelligence, I would back mine against yours any day!! lol
That, plus the fact that all other posters have agreed with my logic
Anyway, it is pointless banging my head against a brick wall trying to talk sense to you. At least you have sense when it comes to football team selection!!

Cheers

[UK Fan]

"We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," said McLachlan during the SACA's

All I can do is leave that with you.

Mclachlan never stated we will lose a test without the developement. HE stated "We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," I cant see where he says dependant on whether we get 4/5 tests stated anywhere

Now BP (this threads kickinit) is it not possible that after being promised we will NEVER lose a test again.

That Adelaide could go next summer without a test. YES OR NO ??????

UK Fan, very frustrating argument, cannot understand your logic. If there are 4 tests, MCG, SCG will get two, that leaves Gabba, Waca, Adel and Bellrieve to get the other two. It might be Adelaide it might not, as CA does the programming prior to the start of the season and if there are only 4 tests per summer, it goes to reason it will be on a rotational basis.

Enough of that, I am not a fan of Mclaughlan.

I think your issue is, firstly you believed McLaughlan - politician, now you are believing Richard Earle - a journalist. If life has taught me one thing, it is do not believe a politician or a journalist, the truth lies in probably 10% of what they say or write, just filter the 90% of bulls..t, that pads their presentation.

I never believed mclachlan and stated all along he was lying thru his teeth. We were told we were being paranoid. And now when we want to keep our president accountable we have tards talking about "you see when we have 4 tests" which is irrelevant.

This entire thread is about promises made by Mclachlan/saca that were lies. Not is the development going to increase/ decrease the chance of Adelaide retaining a test if its a 4 test series like some incredibly unintelligent posters are making out.

The point is Mclachlan should never of made the statement "We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," to his members knowing full we had a 4 test summer coming out and Adelaide is never guaranteed a test when that occurs. Ie. mclachlan made another promise to saca members he can't keep

Title of thread btw ???

Bdp I don't care what you think. All I care about is saca keeping its promises to its members.

Which it clearly HASN'T on this occasion

Thanks for finally seeing the light and backing up our comments, even though you did not realise you had. If, as we all agree, a four test summer never guarantees a test for Adelaide Oval, then it is not a case of the test being lost if one is not held in 2014/15. Please tell me how you can lose something you never possessed?????? Can you not see that very simple logic???? The test can only be lost if it otherwise would have been held. You have stated it may not have been held anyway, so you now agree it is not a case of LOSING it.
Hallelujah!!!!!!!!!!!!

As for lack of intelligence, I would back mine against yours any day!! lol
That, plus the fact that all other posters have agreed with my logic
Anyway, it is pointless banging my head against a brick wall trying to talk sense to you. At least you have sense when it comes to football team selection!!

Even bulls forever conceded mclachlan lied to his members. The point of 4/5/8/27 test is completely irrelevant.
Maybe if I wrote that in crayons you may actually understand it.

The President of saca promised with the re-developement we wouldn't miss out on a test no matter what.

So going on your idiotic theory of you can't lose something you don't possess. Do u go to hospitals and tell people who have still born births/abortions that they have really lost nothing due to fact they never possessed the baby . And the crows who have been penalised the first two round draft picks in this years draft under your theory have lost nothing cos they never possessed those draft picks anyway. People who invested with bank of Cyprus and never received a return on their deposits lost nothing because they never possessed the promised interest return in the first place ????

Saca members have an annual test in our summer calendars. We were told this annual event will be going nowhere after we redevelope the stadium. We have since found is an untrue statement. As to quote you if it goes to 4 tests Adelaide aren't guaranteed anything and that hasn't changed even though we redeveloped the stadium.

I wish people in uraidla opinions of themselves actually matched their so called intelligence is all I can tell ya.

[UK Fan]

"We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," said McLachlan during the SACA's

All I can do is leave that with you.

Mclachlan never stated we will lose a test without the developement. HE stated "We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," I cant see where he says dependant on whether we get 4/5 tests stated anywhere

Now BP (this threads kickinit) is it not possible that after being promised we will NEVER lose a test again.

That Adelaide could go next summer without a test. YES OR NO ??????

Yes

Thank you come again!!!

[bulldogproud2]

Thanks for finally seeing the light and backing up our comments, even though you did not realise you had. If, as we all agree, a four test summer never guarantees a test for Adelaide Oval, then it is not a case of the test being lost if one is not held in 2014/15. Please tell me how you can lose something you never possessed?????? Can you not see that very simple logic???? The test can only be lost if it otherwise would have been held. You have stated it may not have been held anyway, so you now agree it is not a case of LOSING it.
Hallelujah!!!!!!!!!!!!

As for lack of intelligence, I would back mine against yours any day!! lol
That, plus the fact that all other posters have agreed with my logic
Anyway, it is pointless banging my head against a brick wall trying to talk sense to you. At least you have sense when it comes to football team selection!!

Even bulls forever conceded mclachlan lied to his members. The point of 4/5/8/27 test is completely irrelevant.
Maybe if I wrote that in crayons you may actually understand it.

The President of saca promised with the re-developement we wouldn't miss out on a test no matter what.

So going on your idiotic theory of you can't lose something you don't possess. Do u go to hospitals and tell people who have still born births/abortions that they have really lost nothing due to fact they never possessed the baby . And the crows who have been penalised the first two round draft picks in this years draft under your theory have lost nothing cos they never possessed those draft picks anyway. People who invested with bank of Cyprus and never received a return on their deposits lost nothing because they never possessed the promised interest return in the first place ????
Saca members have an annual test in our summer calendars. We were told this annual event will be going nowhere after we redevelope the stadium. We have since found is an untrue statement. As to quote you if it goes to 4 tests Adelaide aren't guaranteed anything and that hasn't changed even though we redeveloped the stadium.

I wish people in uraidla opinions of themselves actually matched their so called intelligence is all I can tell ya.

God, you are such an idiot!!!
People who have stillborn births/abortions (and my heart truly goes out to them) definitely lost a child - however, they had one growing inside of them to begin with. Thus, they possessed one first.
The Crows had the first two draft picks if they did not do anything wrong. Thus, they possessed those draft picks at a time, until they were taken away from them. If they never possessed them, then how could they have been made to give them up??? Think, my man, think!!
Those people who invested with the Bank of Cyprus had to, of course, possess the money to be able to place it in the bank to begin with. It is not the interest that they lost so much as the deposit. How thick are you really??????
SACA members have not always had an annual test in the summer calendars, there have been seasons where there have been no tests.. if you go back far enough.

What is this about Uraidla btw??
As for intelligence, it may not count for much but I am working on my third Masters Degree at the moment and possess an IQ of 145. What is yours???

As for BullsForever comment, what we have been discussing is McLachlan's statement that Adelaide will not lose a test because of the redevelopment. I don't believe McLachlan has been factual in every comment he has made but he was in this one. BullsForever also backed this in, despite your protestations that he didn't.

Cheers

Actually, on second thoughts, I must not be that intelligent. Any intelligent person would have stopped trying to help you see the inconsistencies with your argument a long time ago!!

[bulldogproud2]

"We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," said McLachlan during the SACA's

All I can do is leave that with you.

Mclachlan never stated we will lose a test without the developement. HE stated "We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," I cant see where he says dependant on whether we get 4/5 tests stated anywhere

Now BP (this threads kickinit) is it not possible that after being promised we will NEVER lose a test again.

That Adelaide could go next summer without a test. YES OR NO ??????

Yes

The dispute has never been about whether Adelaide would not host a test in 2014/15, as you well know. Ian McLachlan NEVER stated Adelaide would hold a test in 2014/15.
The statement that you were attacking Ian McLachlan for was stating that the redevelopment would not cause the LOSS of a test. The fact there is one less test in 2014/15 is the reason why Adelaide may miss out on a test match. It has nothing at all to do with the redevelopment. As we all know, the redevelopment assists Adelaide in its chances of holding it, not hinders it.

Cheers


Thank you come again!!!

[bulldogproud2]

.

[UK Fan]

"We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," said McLachlan during the SACA's

All I can do is leave that with you.

Mclachlan never stated we will lose a test without the developement. HE stated "We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development," I cant see where he says dependant on whether we get 4/5 tests stated anywhere

Now BP (this threads kickinit) is it not possible that after being promised we will NEVER lose a test again.

That Adelaide could go next summer without a test. YES OR NO ??????

Yes

The dispute has never been about whether Adelaide would not host a test in 2014/15, as you well know.
The statement that you were attacking Ian McLachlan for was stating that the redevelopment would not cause the LOSS of a test.

Rest assured, it won't.

Cheers


Thank you come again!!!

Excelkent so until you can go off and reference your claim where mclachlan states " that the redevelopment would not cause the LOSS of a test." Because until you can find another quote you know your theory means nothing.

see if your lecturer/class mates can explain the meaning below to u. I know what Mclachlans promising unfortunately a guy with an IQ of 145 can't seem to/doesn't want to admit it. Cos Mclachlans statement could not be more clear.


"We will never lose the Adelaide Test if we have this development[/b]," said McLachlan
"We want to put Adelaide in the No. 3 position on the Test calendar (behind Melbourne and Sydney, but ahead of Brisbane). That is the only way to keep Adelaide in a guaranteed position (for Test matches)."

Because if you don't think he isn't guaranteeing that Adelaide will never lose a test after the re-developement then you really are kickinit IMHO.

[Hondo]

UKinit is this thread about you being right or the AO?

You've even been corrected by a fellow no voter on your latest rubbish what a disaster