Sheffield Shield 2010/11 (Non SA Games/Info)

[mal]

VI 233
FINCH 83[124]
MCDONALD 65[92]
BUTTERWORTH 4/62[19] prolific wicket taker this season

TA 266
COWAN 101[270] great recruit
SIDDLE 4/66[25.3] heeza beauty

VI 351
CARTERS 50[109] runs at last !
FINCH 66[154] good match
At 4/111 Vi were in strife but that man came in
QUINEY 106[180] that man is making a habit of making runs when really really needed of late
At 9/308 TA only 275 behind would have licking thier lips
Then
SIDDLE 25[42]
MCDONALD 21*[23] batting at 11 such is the batting depth of VI in this game ....

TA need 318 to win
STUMPS DAY3
TA 1/1 [4]
COWAN 1 [12]
KRUGER 1* [6]
DOOLAN 0*[6]

This is sure to raise eyebrows
WRIGHT + PATTINSON opened the bowling in front of Peter SIDDLE

RESULT
I reckon TA all out for 248 TOMorrow

[mighty_tiger_79]

Victoria 233 & 351

Tasmania 266 & 253/5 (81.3 ov)

Tasmania require another 66 runs with 5 wickets remaining

Day 4
Tasmania RR 3.10

Refresh scorecard
Current time: 16:47 local, 05:47 GMT First-class career
Batsmen Runs B 4s 6s SR Mat Runs HS Ave
*George Bailey (rhb) 130 201 14 0 64.67 striker 68 4438 155 39.98
James Faulkner (rhb) 13 34 2 0 38.23 non-striker 10 322 59* 32.20

Bowlers O M R W Econ Mat Wkts BBI Ave
*James Pattinson (rfm) 16.3 4 54 1 3.27 (0nb, 0w) 5 15 4/52 27.93
Damien Wright (rfm) 23.0 7 43 1 1.86 (0nb, 0w) 114 372 8/60 28.42

Current partnership 40 runs, 10.1 overs, RR: 3.93


Last Bat TR Birt lbw b Holland 26 (67b 4x4 0x6) SR: 38.80

Fall of wicket: 213/5 (71.2 ov); Partnership: 47 runs, 17.5 overs, RR: 2.63


tassie got a rough chance here

[mighty_tiger_79]

Bailey stays in I think they win, he is the key

[mighty_tiger_79]

Tassie wins by 5 wickets

Bailey 160*
Faulkner 47*

[brod]

Beau Casson (Test player 401) will return to First Class cricket, after a break of 16 months for NSW against Vic starting tomorrow.
NSW win and they will get a home final

[brod]

Chris Rogers will also return to FC cricket tomorrow for Victoria

[bloods08]

NSW 2/242 (Tea)

Hughes 69
Warner 99 (out in the last over before tea)
Jaques 70*

[mal]

NS 3/345 STUMPS
ROHRER 15*[22]
JAQUES 128*[180] glad he has made a ton, good to watch when in form
HUGHES 69[91] about time
WARNER 99[178] ninety nine hopefully no one gets smart
FORREST 25[85] zzzzzzzzz

HILL 1/8[2] the destroyer

[godoubleblues]

I might have missed something but I notice that Mark Cleary is playing for Victoria now

[heater31]

I might have missed something but I notice that Mark Cleary is playing for Victoria now

You have, Mark moved to Melbourne this season

[mighty_tiger_79]

Quinney is going along alright 60 from 80odd

vics

5/159

nsw made 416 first innings

[brod]

Victoria v NSW
MCG

STUMPS DAY 2

NSW 416 (were 2/312)
PA Jacques 129
DA Warner 99
PJ Hughes 69
BJ Rohrer 58
PM Siddle 6/89
JM Holland 3/95
Victoria 8/206
RJ Quiney 66
GJ Maxwell 38 (on debut)
TA Copeland 4/58 (22 overs straight)
B Casson 2/48

SR Clark pulled a hammy after 5 overs

[mal]

Good to see Chris Rogers back playing and made a handy 35[62]
QUINEY plays another good innings with the pressure on 66[93]
MAxwelL played a labourious innings 38[45
SIZZZZZZZZZZLE 6/89[29.2] what we should expect
COPELAND 4/58[22] very good SS bowler, but not test standard
CASSON 2/48[12] He most love having Smith, Hauritz, Okeefe in the squad ....

[brod]

Good to see Chris Rogers back playing and made a handy 35[62]
QUINEY plays another good innings with the pressure on 66[93]
MAxwelL played a labourious innings 38[45
SIZZZZZZZZZZLE 6/89[29.2] what we should expect
COPELAND 4/58[22] very good SS bowler, but not test standard
CASSON 2/48[12] He most love having Smith, Hauritz, Okeefe in the squad ....

On what basis is that--cos he hasnt played one??

[CoverKing]

Good to see Chris Rogers back playing and made a handy 35[62]
QUINEY plays another good innings with the pressure on 66[93]
MAxwelL played a labourious innings 38[45
SIZZZZZZZZZZLE 6/89[29.2] what we should expect
COPELAND 4/58[22] very good SS bowler, but not test standard
CASSON 2/48[12] He most love having Smith, Hauritz, Okeefe in the squad ....

On what basis is that--cos he hasnt played one??

I was thinking exactly the same. The only reason would be the standard of the batters throughout the country is rather substandard so it's easier to get wickets?

[brod]

Victoria v NSW
MCG

STUMPS DAY 3

NSW 416
Victoria 263
RJ Quiney 66
PM Siddle 45* (highes SS score)
GJ Maxwell 38 (on debut)
TA Copeland 4/76
B Casson 4/56
NSW 5/296
PA Jaques 125
BJ Rohrer 88
PM Siddle 2/50
GM Maxwell 2/52

[Media Park]

Jaques, pretty handy return...

[mal]

Victoria v NSW
MCG

STUMPS DAY 3

NSW 416
Victoria 263
RJ Quiney 66
PM Siddle 45* (highes SS score)
GJ Maxwell 38 (on debut)
TA Copeland 4/76
B Casson 4/56
NSW 5/296
PA Jaques 125
BJ Rohrer 88
PM Siddle 2/50
GM Maxwell 2/52

449 lead with one day to go
Fair dinkum, absolute disgrace
NS 32
VI 14
thats the points after the first innings result
TA are 2nd on the ladder with 26 points and are playing WA now
WHY DIDNT NSW DECLARE 30 MINUTES B4 STUMPS ????????????

You would think NS may well have declared 400 in front and with approximately 105 overs to bowl
But then again 18 points in front with 2 games and 1 innings left for VI is too risky ...

[Brodlach]

Maybe concerned with one less bowler (Stuart Clark injured) that Victoria with an outright win could end up making the Shield Final?

[mal]

Maybe concerned with one less bowler (Stuart Clark injured) that Victoria with an outright win could end up making the Shield Final?

I am assuming 6 points is the maximum points per game
THEN

NS 32
VI 14
They are the points after the 3rd innings b4 the declaration

IF
NS lose this game outright and fail to pick up a point in thier last games = 32 points
VI win and then win the last 2 games outright = 32 points[for 3 x 6 points ?]

IF NS are worried about all that happening then I am flabbergasted

Meanwhile just to further emphasise how gutless or wrong NS are

TA V WA

WA 6/95

6 points to TA = 32 points

What IF NS loses the home final now .....

I LOOKed at the ladder a few days ago, I worked it out
Surely the NS mob did
So I think they are GUTLESS or perhaps concerned that CLARK is injured