SA Footy

locky801 wrote:

stampy wrote:need a big parnership here

yep well done

Shades of @Armchair expert…

Fair catch that

lose a wicket right on lunch, how many fookn times does this happen ffs.....

Henry and Phillips have been awesome this series. Good to see NZ have some decent young bowlers also in Sears and O'Rourke coming through because southee is done and that Kuggelain fella is garbage.

northerner wrote:

mal wrote:

Sonofbrowny25 wrote:

stan wrote:Trav needs to calm down, we don't need to get rhe runs tonight.

take it as it comes. this is how he will survive. (more of a chance than blocking) break them and get that ball soft

Excellent post
Posted before he got out
He did hit a massive 6 off a hoik then a pull that sizzled to the boundary
He also cover drove a ball thru the covers ala so so Sobers, Lara, Pollock. Hookes, like
But when he gets out , oooooooooh why did he play that shot for

He has one style- ATTACK
7 test tons, and some of the best you could see in test cricket are forgotten when gets out

Fact is Head is our least productive bat over the summer.
In the past 16 innings, he has passed 50 once. Smith and Labuschagne have passed fifty 4 times in the same time. ATTACKING attitude isn't a excuse for lack of output. That's sounding like a Bazzball moral victory statement.

Posted by NORTHENER
Liked by WHUFC and LAUGHY 801

I hear you all, and wont disagree that Trav is struggling at present

QUESTION
How should he bat from next innings onwards ?

What is the game situation we are making that decision on?

The best batters throughout history have always been able to bat at different paces. Even Warner and Gilchrist knew how to bat situations despite the fact they always looked to play on the positive side.

Head has more opposition attention on him then ever before. The fact he is going hard every single time regardless of situation the bowlers aren’t having to ball to him anymore, captains can set pre planned fields from ball one and stick

I dont think Trav should be dropped but I’m not sure having one plan only is the best option long term either. Just like Bazball it can be real successful for periods but without a plan b it looks unsustainable long term.

I guess to answer you question….Head caught teams off guard with his ball one attack so when he comes out to bat next he is going to have the advantage of NZ setting defensive fields with blokes spread on the boundary. Now that he is out of form I would like to see him use that to his advantage and work into the innings by manipulating the spread field. Give the NZ captain a different look to think about. Maybe try and force him to bring some fielder closers to bat. Maybe make the bowlers find a straighter line to him.

Just like he had nothing to lose with his brazen attack, he has nothing to lose for an innings or two reigning it in a tad whilst still being positive

Forget all of that if he comes in at 3/250 haha

The Dark Knight wrote:Some blokes on here whinged about Heads dismissal, what are you going to say about Carey? Lol

Both were awful shots. Both are guys out of form.
One has a Primary role of keeping wickets, which he is doing well.
Heads Primary role is to bat, and atm he is the worst performing batsman in the top six.

As much as it hurts to praise Warner haha I think he is the greatest example of a real attacking batsmen being able to bat at speeds pending form etc

At times when he was out of form he would hit his way out of a slump, at other times he could real gritty and wear bowlers down whilst always still looking to score runs

It was what made him the champion batter he was, he had plans A, B, C

You knew Warner in a form slump was going to come out and run real hard between wickets, put pressure on the fielders etc

All out with a lead of 94.

DOC wrote:All out with a lead of 94.

Henry 7/67

dedja wrote:

Booney wrote:Is there a less imposing "quick" then Mitt Hinry?

True, 3/32 so far against a brittle batting line up.

Finished with 7/67.

dedja wrote:

dedja wrote:

Booney wrote:Is there a less imposing "quick" then Mitt Hinry?

True, 3/32 so far against a brittle batting line up.

Finished with 7/67.

And got the nightwatchman out for 20

Starc gets one early

NZ 1/6

NZ 1/-88

NZ 1/43 at tea

Took no risks at all that session

The Dark Knight wrote:Some blokes on here whinged about Heads dismissal, what are you going to say about Carey? Lol

No argument here.

An hour into day 2, set your self up play your self in. The way NZ played that session shows how good the pitch is for batting.

We should be 150 in from right now 6-7 down.

Now our bowlers are out there again trying get our batsmen out of the pooh again.

It line we’re playing poor man’s pommie bazzball!

Get a wicket FFS

AU did well after Careys dismissal 7/189 to 256 all out
I would think Ozzies would happy to get that many

Get Green off ffs

He we go its lets bowl short again 3 on the leg side fence 2 others also on leg side

1/95