
Thunder 1/12
5 over par is now 33
by Brucetiki » Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:47 pm
by Brucetiki » Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:52 pm
by Brucetiki » Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:56 pm
by dedja » Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:57 pm
by Squids » Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:05 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:10 pm
by stampy » Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:13 pm
Squids wrote:Dan Smith is a disgrace....if only they put an athletic player in at cover my fantasy players would not of gone for so many runs. The bloke can not field, throws himself in the air.....nasa thinks the resulting crater is an asteroid.
Can't bat either.
by mal » Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:16 pm
mal wrote:Fingers crossed Sydney Thunder get the 5 overs in to constitute a match ...
by Squids » Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:17 pm
stampy wrote:Squids wrote:Dan Smith is a disgrace....if only they put an athletic player in at cover my fantasy players would not of gone for so many runs. The bloke can not field, throws himself in the air.....nasa thinks the resulting crater is an asteroid.
Can't bat either.
u didnt see his 180 odd againt the vics?
by Jim05 » Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:25 pm
Squids wrote:stampy wrote:Squids wrote:Dan Smith is a disgrace....if only they put an athletic player in at cover my fantasy players would not of gone for so many runs. The bloke can not field, throws himself in the air.....nasa thinks the resulting crater is an asteroid.
Can't bat either.
u didnt see his 180 odd againt the vics?
North Sydney oval is no bigger than my backyard.
by Jim05 » Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:29 pm
by dedja » Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:32 pm
by redandblack » Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:45 pm
mal wrote:mal wrote:Fingers crossed Sydney Thunder get the 5 overs in to constitute a match ...
Rain, Gayle, Thunder
ST 4/29[5.3]
this is a result game by 3 balls
88 needed with 63 balls with 6 wickets in hand was the equation
But becoz of this absurd Duckworthless Lewis System , one team wins
Too inconclusive for me
by mal » Sun Jan 08, 2012 9:33 pm
redandblack wrote:mal wrote:mal wrote:Fingers crossed Sydney Thunder get the 5 overs in to constitute a match ...
Rain, Gayle, Thunder
ST 4/29[5.3]
this is a result game by 3 balls
88 needed with 63 balls with 6 wickets in hand was the equation
But becoz of this absurd Duckworthless Lewis System , one team wins
Too inconclusive for me
Sorry mal, disagree with you about Duckworth Lewis.
It's better than any other system, including calling it a draw.
by mal » Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:09 pm
by jackpot jim » Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:40 pm
mal wrote:redandblack wrote:mal wrote:mal wrote:Fingers crossed Sydney Thunder get the 5 overs in to constitute a match ...
Rain, Gayle, Thunder
ST 4/29[5.3]
this is a result game by 3 balls
88 needed with 63 balls with 6 wickets in hand was the equation
But becoz of this absurd Duckworthless Lewis System , one team wins
Too inconclusive for me
Sorry mal, disagree with you about Duckworth Lewis.
It's better than any other system, including calling it a draw.
Had ST been 0/30[5] they would have lost
And yet a team needing 87 off 66 balls with 10 wickets left would be $1-10 favorites with the Bookies
To constitute a game the side batting 2nd should be made to bat at least 75 % of the overs [being 15 overs]
No sport should be decided on a system
This 5 over result crapp is a joke
by Media Park » Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:42 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by redandblack » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:08 pm
by mal » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:30 pm
redandblack wrote:I agree with you about the 5 over limit for a result.
I strongly support the DL system, but it's pretty hard adapting any system for T20.
by mal » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:46 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |