Choccies wrote:Nah credit where credit is due. Those South Africans were just too good for us...
ICC T20 World CUP
Re: ICC T20 World CUP
by The Dark Knight » Mon May 17, 2010 2:47 pm
-
The Dark Knight - Coach
- Posts: 35685
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:32 pm
- Location: Gotham City
- Has liked: 11852 times
- Been liked: 1676 times
- Grassroots Team: North Haven
Re: ICC T20 World CUP
by Lightning McQueen » Mon May 17, 2010 3:43 pm
bulldogproud2 wrote:Whilst Keiswetter and Pietersen were useful in this match, there is no doubt that the game was won by England's bowlers (all home grown *grins*).
However, it must be saddening to Australians to know that their bowlers struggle to dismiss batsmen who had to leave South Africa to even get a game of cricket *grins*
Yeah the Seth Efricken connection had nothing to do with it, 110 for 80 balls didn't set it up. Swan and Sidearse bowled well though. Wasn't that the first world cup of any form of crikcet the poms have won
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
-
Lightning McQueen - Coach
- Posts: 53703
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
- Location: Radiator Springs
- Has liked: 4629 times
- Been liked: 8579 times
Re: ICC T20 World CUP
by bulldogproud2 » Mon May 17, 2010 4:46 pm
As I stated, the South African connection were useful but England's bowlers had done enough to win it as long as we produced a reasonable batting performance. Although Kieswetter and Pietersen batted very well, the score they had to chase was lower than any England had produced in the tournament. It was definitely the bowlers who gave us the edge.
Cheers
Cheers
- bulldogproud2
- League - Best 21
-
- Posts: 1702
- Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:24 pm
- Location: West Beach or Henley Oval
- Has liked: 52 times
- Been liked: 51 times
- Grassroots Team: Imperials
Re: ICC T20 World CUP
by Media Park » Tue May 18, 2010 12:09 am
bulldogproud2 wrote:As I stated, the South African connection were useful but England's bowlers had done enough to win it as long as we produced a reasonable batting performance. Although Kieswetter and Pietersen batted very well, the score they had to chase was lower than any England had produced in the tournament. It was definitely the bowlers who gave us the edge.
Cheers
are you one of those south african pommies?
Direct quote:
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
-
Media Park - Coach
-
- Posts: 13864
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:28 pm
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
- Grassroots Team: Boston
Re: ICC T20 World CUP
by Choccies » Tue May 18, 2010 2:04 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:bulldogproud2 wrote:Whilst Keiswetter and Pietersen were useful in this match, there is no doubt that the game was won by England's bowlers (all home grown *grins*).
However, it must be saddening to Australians to know that their bowlers struggle to dismiss batsmen who had to leave South Africa to even get a game of cricket *grins*
Yeah the Seth Efricken connection had nothing to do with it, 110 for 80 balls didn't set it up. Swan and Sidearse bowled well though. Wasn't that the first world cup of any form of crikcet the poms have won
I guess they'll all receive knighthoods now.....
I love grapes. With grapes, you always get another chance. You know, if you have a crappy apple or a peach, you’re stuck with that crappy piece of fruit. If you have a crappy grape, no problem-just move on to the next. ‘Grapes: The Fruit of Hope.
Re: ICC T20 World CUP
by Johno6 » Tue May 18, 2010 5:36 pm
i look forward to the ashes.... 5 - 0 would be nice this time i think
R.I.P Mum 28/02/12
Asterix Users - Squibs
Asterix Users - Squibs
Board index
Other Sports Cricket
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
Advertisements by Advertisement Management