Third Test v South Africa

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:06 pm

carey wrote:Will Ponting bat tonight?

Be a big ask last test surely you would'nt send him in if Aus lose another wicket?



lyon just came out to a huge reception!!! :lol:

he even had rickys mrs up and about briefly
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60882
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13401 times
Been liked: 4629 times

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby whufc » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:06 pm

Wow wouldn't mind seeing that compared to the one the Saffies had which was going over.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28714
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5948 times
Been liked: 2844 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby Pup » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:07 pm

MightyEagles wrote:Watson out lb via referal for 10
Lyon is in.


He knew he was out, he mouthed to Warner thats close!
You sunk my Scrabbleship
User avatar
Pup
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:09 am
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby helicopterking » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:08 pm

Sky Pilot wrote:
helicopterking wrote:
Sky Pilot wrote:
helicopterking wrote:Impossible to get an LBW at the WACA if the ball hits the pitch. Hits under the knee roll and apprantly goes over. :roll:

Camera's don't lie!


I dont trust them. Just hard to believe that half way up the shin is going over!

You could be right. They argue strongly that there is more bounce on the WACA wicket


Watson wicket looked no different
User avatar
helicopterking
Coach
 
Posts: 5832
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 10:38 pm
Has liked: 306 times
Been liked: 710 times

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby dedja » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:08 pm

faarking nightwatchman ... :twisted:
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.

I’m only the administrator of the estate of dedja
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 24041
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 739 times
Been liked: 1655 times

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby wycbloods » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:08 pm

Watsons problems with LBW hasn't gone.
Last edited by wycbloods on Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7006
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby Jim05 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:09 pm

What a faarkin load of crap!!!
When those c**ts got hit on the pads today DRS showed it as being too high.
When we bat its all of a sudden hitting, if Wattos was out so was the one off Starc
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48300
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3835 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby Pup » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:11 pm

Jim05 wrote:What a faarkin load of crap!!!
When those c**ts got hit on the pads today DRS showed it as being too high.
When we bat its all of a sudden hitting, if Wattos was out so was the one off Starc


Nope

Starcs was sliding just down leg and it did hit him a little higher, Watto was definately out even he knew it.

Dont let your hatred of the South Arfricans affect your judgement ;)
You sunk my Scrabbleship
User avatar
Pup
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:09 am
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby whufc » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:11 pm

Jim05 wrote:What a faarkin load of crap!!!
When those c**ts got hit on the pads today DRS showed it as being too high.
When we bat its all of a sudden hitting, if Wattos was out so was the one off Starc


Agree, there was also the hot spot they showed earlier in the day where the ball smashed the pad yet hot spot showed nothing.

Maybe some issues with their technology!
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28714
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5948 times
Been liked: 2844 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby whufc » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:12 pm

The only thing against Watto is he gets the knee very low when he plays he front foot shots!
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28714
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5948 times
Been liked: 2844 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby Phantom Gossiper » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:14 pm

Gazza Lyon to ton up :D
Phantom Gossiper
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11144
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:35 pm
Has liked: 402 times
Been liked: 285 times

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby Pup » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:15 pm

Watto was plumb boys move on
You sunk my Scrabbleship
User avatar
Pup
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:09 am
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby Jim05 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:16 pm

Pup wrote:
Jim05 wrote:What a faarkin load of crap!!!
When those c**ts got hit on the pads today DRS showed it as being too high.
When we bat its all of a sudden hitting, if Wattos was out so was the one off Starc


Nope

Starcs was sliding just down leg and it did hit him a little higher, Watto was definately out even he knew it.

Dont let your hatred of the South Arfricans affect your judgement ;)

My hatred of those pricks have nothing to do with it.
I think the DRS has a large margin of error, I still dont trust hawkeye.
Still too much doubt for mine.
In both instances today the ump gave the batsmen not out which is probably a fair call
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48300
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3835 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby helicopterking » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:18 pm

Pup wrote:Watto was plumb boys move on



So was Faf. but technology says other, so my eyes are lying to me
User avatar
helicopterking
Coach
 
Posts: 5832
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 10:38 pm
Has liked: 306 times
Been liked: 710 times

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby whufc » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:18 pm

Pup wrote:Watto was plumb boys move on


Agree it looked out but there seem to be a massive discrepancy between two similar balls and the height. Wattos was hitting 3/4 way up yet the Starc one was going a couple of balls over, Watto seemed to have taken the bigger step forward as well.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28714
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5948 times
Been liked: 2844 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby Pup » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:19 pm

helicopterking wrote:
Pup wrote:Watto was plumb boys move on



So was Faf. but technology says other, so my eyes are lying to me


No like i said before his was drifting leg side and hit higher, yes it was close but i would choose Watsons every day of the week to be out.
You sunk my Scrabbleship
User avatar
Pup
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:09 am
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby helicopterking » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:22 pm

Pup wrote:
helicopterking wrote:
Pup wrote:Watto was plumb boys move on



So was Faf. but technology says other, so my eyes are lying to me


No like i said before his was drifting leg side and hit higher, yes it was close but i would choose Watsons every day of the week to be out.


says the technology
User avatar
helicopterking
Coach
 
Posts: 5832
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 10:38 pm
Has liked: 306 times
Been liked: 710 times

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby Pup » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:25 pm

helicopterking wrote:
Pup wrote:
helicopterking wrote:
Pup wrote:Watto was plumb boys move on



So was Faf. but technology says other, so my eyes are lying to me


No like i said before his was drifting leg side and hit higher, yes it was close but i would choose Watsons every day of the week to be out.


says the technology


Live i thought it was going down leg but thought the height was ok.
You sunk my Scrabbleship
User avatar
Pup
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:09 am
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby Pup » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:27 pm

Jim05 wrote:
Pup wrote:
Jim05 wrote:What a faarkin load of crap!!!
When those c**ts got hit on the pads today DRS showed it as being too high.
When we bat its all of a sudden hitting, if Wattos was out so was the one off Starc


Nope

Starcs was sliding just down leg and it did hit him a little higher, Watto was definately out even he knew it.

Dont let your hatred of the South Arfricans affect your judgement ;)

My hatred of those pricks have nothing to do with it.
I think the DRS has a large margin of error, I still dont trust hawkeye.
Still too much doubt for mine.
In both instances today the ump gave the batsmen not out which is probably a fair call


How was there doubt with Watsons? Hit in line, hit under the knee roll and was hitting middle. No doubt at all, replay or live for me.
You sunk my Scrabbleship
User avatar
Pup
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:09 am
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Third Test v South Africa

Postby bulldog2004 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:33 pm

Big chance for a Nathan Lyon double ton tomorrow. :D
bulldog2004
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:58 pm
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 12 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |