
by Media Park » Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:44 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Coach Bombay » Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:46 pm
by scoob » Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:47 pm
Jim05 wrote:scoob wrote:Dont know to use this oneor this one
![]()
As for Chuck![]()
OL has been saying this for months
by mal » Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:49 pm
by Coach Bombay » Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:49 pm
by eags » Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:49 pm
Media Park wrote:I am not going to abuse the team, but clearly George, Sayers, Mennie and Putland when fit would now be our most dangerous attack.
What we need to work on with regards to our bowling is simply finishing teams off. I think this will largely be resolved when Putland is in instead of Williams/Tietjens type players. Instead of the numbers 8-11 in the opposing side facing up to a bunny bowler, there's four threats there.
Our batting was absolutely terrible, no exceptions, no excuses.
by locky801 » Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:53 pm
by Coach Bombay » Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:02 pm
by overloaded » Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:11 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by Coach Bombay » Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:14 pm
by OnSong » Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:15 pm
by Coach Bombay » Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:33 pm
mal wrote:How about we all support our state team
The bowlers have restricted VI to 20/401 despite Hollands sensational batting effort and the no name bowling attack have done a darn good job
The batters should be thinking if Holland could slog a half ton, why cant we
SA should be positive, play aggressively on this deck, and you never know that 302 might be obtained
by Coach Bombay » Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:33 pm
mal wrote:How about we all support our state team
The bowlers have restricted VI to 20/401 despite Hollands sensational batting effort and the no name bowling attack have done a darn good job
The batters should be thinking if Holland could slog a half ton, why cant we
SA should be positive, play aggressively on this deck, and you never know that 302 might be obtained
by locky801 » Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:47 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:54 pm
by drifter » Tue Feb 14, 2012 6:12 pm
eags wrote:Media Park wrote:I am not going to abuse the team, but clearly George, Sayers, Mennie and Putland when fit would now be our most dangerous attack.
What we need to work on with regards to our bowling is simply finishing teams off. I think this will largely be resolved when Putland is in instead of Williams/Tietjens type players. Instead of the numbers 8-11 in the opposing side facing up to a bunny bowler, there's four threats there.
Our batting was absolutely terrible, no exceptions, no excuses.
Putland won't play Sheffield Shield until the one dayers are finished. SACA not willing to risk him.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |