mal wrote:smac wrote:What seems lost on most of you is that you aren't the target audience. CA is seeking new audiences with the BBL.
It will fund first class cricket so I hope it succeeds.
Move over all of us old farts
This is the new cricket for the new generation
Its putting bums on seats
Thats what the ACB want
Thats what Smac has posted
Thats what I understand had to happen
We're not ******* stupid. Those that are against teeball understand the concepts of bums on seats and the importance of having a financially healthy sport. But why do these legitimate objectives have to destroy the very fabric of the sport? Why is some of this all important money being paid to superannuate players who got the benefit of a proper cricket education in what was the best domestic competition in the world which produced the best test side for over a century?
Here we are in December and we've just seen our second XI getting rolled in Hobart because as well as tests and one dayers the players now also have
another format to fit into what is an already overcrowded calendar and the players are starting to drop like flies. I've never seen so many injuries in Cricket. Here we are in December and there are no Shield games. You know, that quaint old competition that produces test cricketers? We have the Indians over here doing a decent preparation for the perhaps the first time ever and now CA has decided that we don't need to prepare our Test Cricketers just so they can get 5000 people to turn up in Sydney. Bums on Seats right.
Coming up with these bullshit teams makes teeball even more irrelvant and has even more meaningless matches just so they can temporarily win over a few extra fans. teeball and Cricket have only a small resemblence to one another so I can't see many bandwagon jumpers opting to follow test cricket or even one dayers. It's all about the coin they can grab before people recognise teeball for what it is, fake, glittery, Americanised garbage. In the meantime we have deconstructed the foundation of the domestic scene - the privelidge of representing your
state.
I would like the bums on seats approach to not forget about the integrity of the Shield and not fill our calendar with meaningless slogfests. Every year for the last few seasons there is more and more teeball for the pop up fans. IMO the teeball 'revolution' is a disingenous cynical cash grab that has mortgaged the very future of the game that it purports to be benefiting.
I also belive that comparisons to the Packer era is a false anology. Packer didn't introduce a shorter format of the game and he didn't forget about the longer format of the game either. What he did do is get the best players in the world and got them to play against each other in intense competition that did introduce new fans and retained them as doing these things is good business. While WSC was primarily a business venture its genesis was that unlike today, during that era the players were on absolute squat. teeball is not a player driven 'revolution' but an opportunistic money making exercise undertaken by a tragically inept sporting administration. teeball doesn't get the best players against each other because we are bringing out old blokes, players from other countries and trawling through the first class scene to fill the numbers. teeball isn't fit to be classed anything near to what WSC was.
If Cricket survives this perilous period, fans in the future will look back and shake their heads at the colossal folly that is being undertaken by the current administration. The only Bums in seats I worry about is James Sutherland and his gang of cluessless idiots. Yeah, let's rack in the cash bugger the game. It's a lot more than 'get with the times'.
regards,
REB