by spell_check » Wed Mar 23, 2011 5:10 pm
by FlyingHigh » Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:14 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:
I know it was meant to speed things up gadj, but they could also have sped things up by not having Australia have a full week or more between most of its games.
The current set-up and the 10-round-robin series both take 44-45 qualifying games by my calculations. With the round-robin of 5 in a pool, it only takes 20 games, so a few more games could be played can be spent on the business end.
Agree Spelly, the final is unlikely to be the best of three because they want to make it a big television event, but I reckon the tournament deserves it
I don't really care how long it takes, it's once every 4 years so IMO they need to give everyone equal opportunity to perform at the optimum level for a period of time to determine who is the best ODI team in the world.
I'd prefer to see everyone play each other once and then the top 4 play off or something similar like they did in the 91/92 WC. Every team is bound to have at least one bad day and it shouldn't be so detrimental to their finals hopes, maybe cut it back to 8 and let them have a round robin, as much as I like to see the minnows given an opportunity, none of them are going to ever win it. They can play in the minnow cup at the same time, imagine any of them facing Tait, Lee or Johnson on the WACA, the only reason thay are competitive is because of the tracks they are playing on.
by gadj1976 » Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:28 pm
by Media Park » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:01 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by whufc » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:02 pm
whufc wrote:windies to win easily and make semis as i predicted prior to the wc starting.
by dedja » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:04 pm
by Media Park » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:04 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by dedja » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:06 pm
by Media Park » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:08 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by whufc » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:12 pm
by dedja » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:13 pm
whufc wrote:though if there is a team that can still lose from this position it is the Pakis
by stampy » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:14 pm
by Media Park » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:23 pm
dedja wrote:whufc wrote:though if there is a team that can still lose from this position it is the Pakis
You can bet on it ...
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by dedja » Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:03 pm
by dedja » Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:08 pm
by fish » Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:40 pm
Apparantly that's the thrid lowest World Cup total ever!dedja wrote:Windies all out for 112.
by Jim05 » Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:49 pm
by Jim05 » Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:05 pm
Jim05 wrote:Absolutely piss weak by the Windies, as ive said all tournament they are flat track bullies against minnows but rubbish against quality bowling.
Afridi the star once again with 4/30 and Gul was no suprise he is a quality ODI bowler, have really been suprised with Hafeez this wc and tonight he took 2/16 off 10 overs, surely that is one of the most economical spells ever in WC history.
Pakis to pass it in a canter, probably 15-20 overs.
by dedja » Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:07 pm
by Jim05 » Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:09 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |