by mal » Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:00 am
by Media Park » Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:28 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Rik E Boy » Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:01 am
Media Park wrote:Why We Can't Win The Ashes:
The same reason ENG cannot win them...
Neither side is good enough to bowl the other team out twice.
by Gingernuts » Tue Nov 30, 2010 11:47 am
by FlyingHigh » Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:35 pm
by FlyingHigh » Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:38 pm
locky801 wrote:Think Ponting also is not inventive enough FFS England are 1/309, why not try something different, throw the ball to Hussey or Katich, even himself for a couple of overs, you just never know what might happen, obviously Clarke is no where near fit or he would have got a couple of overs there, we have bowlers that have alot of heart but that appears to be it. Can guarantee you wont see Siddle get more than 2 or 3 fa now, Hilffs around the mark, bit if it dont swing, he is just a containing bowler. Have to get Bollinger and Harris in there to get into the Poms faces a bit.
Think if you go back in history with Pontings captaincy once the oppostion batters get on top early it seems to be more containment then instead of trying to get wickets or trying something different
by locky801 » Tue Nov 30, 2010 6:20 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:locky801 wrote:Think Ponting also is not inventive enough FFS England are 1/309, why not try something different, throw the ball to Hussey or Katich, even himself for a couple of overs, you just never know what might happen, obviously Clarke is no where near fit or he would have got a couple of overs there, we have bowlers that have alot of heart but that appears to be it. Can guarantee you wont see Siddle get more than 2 or 3 fa now, Hilffs around the mark, bit if it dont swing, he is just a containing bowler. Have to get Bollinger and Harris in there to get into the Poms faces a bit.
Think if you go back in history with Pontings captaincy once the oppostion batters get on top early it seems to be more containment then instead of trying to get wickets or trying something different
Dead right locky. Always reckon the occasional medium-pacer is better than another off-spinner in these situations, especially if they can skid through a little bit. Always remember Taylor throwing Ponting the ball v WI in 1996 when they were about 3/240, Hooper had made a ton, got out not concentrating to Ponting, all out 270. Was also one of the reasons Chappelli loved Dougie Walters.
by Media Park » Tue Nov 30, 2010 6:37 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Media Park wrote:Why We Can't Win The Ashes:
The same reason ENG cannot win them...
Neither side is good enough to bowl the other team out twice.
England don't need to bowl Australia out to win the Ashes, 0-0 and they keep em.
regards,
REB
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by carey » Tue Nov 30, 2010 6:43 pm
Media Park wrote:Why We Can't Win The Ashes:
The same reason ENG cannot win them...
Neither side is good enough to bowl the other team out twice.
by Pidge » Tue Nov 30, 2010 6:47 pm
Media Park wrote:Why We Can't Win The Ashes:
The same reason ENG cannot win them...
Neither side is good enough to bowl the other team out twice.
by Rik E Boy » Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:46 am
carey wrote:Media Park wrote:Why We Can't Win The Ashes:
The same reason ENG cannot win them...
Neither side is good enough to bowl the other team out twice.
that there is a very very good point!![]()
by wycbloods » Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:01 am
Pidge wrote:Media Park wrote:Why We Can't Win The Ashes:
The same reason ENG cannot win them...
Neither side is good enough to bowl the other team out twice.
Probably due to the fact that Australian selectors pick their 'favourites' over players that should be in the team.
by Bluedemon » Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:45 am
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:50 am
kookas wrote:if we keep playing johnson and north we are going to get done. at least johnson made a century last test, more than north could do.
by teaoby » Wed Dec 01, 2010 12:03 pm
by stan » Wed Dec 01, 2010 12:11 pm
teaoby wrote:lets be honest here. yes the feild placings wernt great. BUT!!
a/ we dropped catches
b/ it was a road of a pitch. there was 2 wickets taken in what 2 and a half days?? and 800 odd runs made.
as someone said earlier its going to take a pitch with land mines in it for either team to win because unless swann goes nuts in either adeliade or sydney neither team will take the 20 wickets.
by Media Park » Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:21 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:carey wrote:Media Park wrote:Why We Can't Win The Ashes:
The same reason ENG cannot win them...
Neither side is good enough to bowl the other team out twice.
that there is a very very good point!![]()
regards
REB
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by locky801 » Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:27 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:47 pm
by The Dark Knight » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:47 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Why we can't win the Ashes ..... England are better than us in all areas of the game. Pretty simple really.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |