
Is that the same fellow who SR Clark made look distinctly ordinary the other night?
by Media Park » Sat Feb 05, 2011 5:45 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by brod » Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:11 am
Media Park wrote:RGL Carters!![]()
Is that the same fellow who SR Clark made look distinctly ordinary the other night?
by Bulls forever » Sun Feb 06, 2011 8:11 pm
brod wrote:Media Park wrote:RGL Carters!![]()
Is that the same fellow who SR Clark made look distinctly ordinary the other night?
One and the same
by Jim05 » Sun Feb 06, 2011 8:14 pm
Bulls forever wrote:brod wrote:Media Park wrote:RGL Carters!![]()
Is that the same fellow who SR Clark made look distinctly ordinary the other night?
One and the same
Is the same Carters that will have to leave the state of Victoria in pursuit of playing First Class cricket, is a well renowned keeper as well as good batter. Can't see him getting the gig over Wade, so he would make a fantastic replacement in a year or two for choco and in the meantime he can open the batting for us at shield level. I am sure our next coach "Chuck" is all over that.
by brod » Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:15 am
Jim05 wrote:Bulls forever wrote:brod wrote:Media Park wrote:RGL Carters!![]()
Is that the same fellow who SR Clark made look distinctly ordinary the other night?
One and the same
Is the same Carters that will have to leave the state of Victoria in pursuit of playing First Class cricket, is a well renowned keeper as well as good batter. Can't see him getting the gig over Wade, so he would make a fantastic replacement in a year or two for choco and in the meantime he can open the batting for us at shield level. I am sure our next coach "Chuck" is all over that.
Dont let the Luderman lovers read this
by brod » Thu Feb 17, 2011 9:40 pm
by brod » Thu Feb 17, 2011 9:44 pm
by brod » Thu Feb 17, 2011 9:47 pm
by Grahaml » Thu Feb 17, 2011 10:25 pm
brod wrote:Victoria v ACT
ACT WON BY 6 WICKETS
Victoria 298
CJL Rogers 71
AH Delmont 70
PL Hanscomb 68
MA Higgs 5/76
ACT 363
MJ Littlewood 91
JI Nicoll 59
MA Higgs 49
SJ Reid 3/83
Victoria 272
CJL Rogers 86 (ret)
TP Doropoulos 52
BS Oakley 5/28
N Winter 3/76
ACT 4/212
TC Thornton 100
M Wescomb 51*
by wycbloods » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:22 am
brod wrote:Victoria v ACT
ACT WON BY 6 WICKETS
Victoria 298
CJL Rogers 71
AH Delmont 70
PL Hanscomb 68
MA Higgs 5/76
ACT 363
MJ Littlewood 91
JI Nicoll 59
MA Higgs 49
SJ Reid 3/83
Victoria 272
CJL Rogers 86 (ret)TP Doropoulos 52
BS Oakley 5/28
N Winter 3/76
ACT 4/212
TC Thornton 100
M Wescomb 51*
by bloods08 » Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:41 am
wycbloods wrote:brod wrote:Victoria v ACT
ACT WON BY 6 WICKETS
Victoria 298
CJL Rogers 71
AH Delmont 70
PL Hanscomb 68
MA Higgs 5/76
ACT 363
MJ Littlewood 91
JI Nicoll 59
MA Higgs 49
SJ Reid 3/83
Victoria 272
CJL Rogers 86 (ret)TP Doropoulos 52
BS Oakley 5/28
N Winter 3/76
ACT 4/212
TC Thornton 100
M Wescomb 51*
Why would you retire when your side is not in a very good position?
by brod » Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:50 pm
by brod » Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:43 am
by brod » Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:07 pm
by Jim05 » Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:07 pm
by smac » Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:27 pm
by smac » Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:28 pm
by Jim05 » Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:55 pm
by Jim05 » Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:25 pm
by Footy Smart » Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:28 pm
Jim05 wrote:WA all out 289
SA 0/20 require 83 to win
Haberfield with 5 wickets in innings, 10 for match
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |