rod_rooster wrote:mal wrote:After watching cricket for about 40 years Ive come to this conclusion
Brad Hodge is prob the unluckiest cricketer in that time
David Hookes, Darren Lehmann, Jamie Siddons, Stuart Law etc. etc. all say hello.
Sorry to nitpick Rooster but I will compare Cuz Hodgey with your list
SIDDONS
0 TESTS
IST CLASS 11387 [44.91]
Was very unlucky never to play a test, perhaps the best batsman never to play a test in Australian history ?
But Hodge was unluckier
HODGE
6 TESTS 503 [55.88]
1ST CLASS 17012 [48-88]
Hodge is unluckier becoz he did get a gig played exceptionally well got dropped and averaged 55 !
LAW
1 TEST 54 NOT OUT
1ST CLASS 27070[50.52]
Unlucky bugger he would have better off getting out and having a test average similar to Hodge!
But Hodgey unluckier becoz of the same reasons vrs Siddons
BOOF
TESTS 1798 [44-95]
FIRST CLASS 25795[57-83]
Should have played more tests , got picked late in his career in his 3os, but played 21 more games than Hodgey so still had more of an an opportunity
HOOKES
TEST 1306 [34-36]
FIRST CLASS 12671 [43-99]
A wise man once told me averages are not the be all and end all, with Hookesy its true
He played in an era when bowlers were at the most lethalist that I can recall
Did play a bit of circus cricket that interupted his career
Unlucky ? Dunno he did have 23 Tests
To summise Brad Hodge is very unlucky, he did get an opportunity averaged 55 in a handful of innings and was vanquished
Yes he has not helped his cause with his press comments , but I imagine I would be bitter and be tempted to mouth off as well iif it was me