4th Ashes Test Aust V Eng @ Headingly, Leeds

[Pup]

So then to our bowling..................how the hell do we get 20 wickets in a test that looks like it might be rain effected again. Lee and S.Clarke MUST come in surely. Hauritz unlucky but must go out. Siddle to have the game off too. Can anyone tell me why the Kat hasn't bowled more in this series? He'd probably go for 6 an over but he might just pick up the odd wicket or two along the way. Surely he's a better option with the ball than North.........IMHO

Back problem, pulls up terribly after bowling.

Siddle for Clarke and possibly Hauritz for Lee depending on the pitch would be my changes.

[Gozu]

Sounds like Lee won't be considered.

[CoverKing]

So then to our bowling..................how the hell do we get 20 wickets in a test that looks like it might be rain effected again. Lee and S.Clarke MUST come in surely. Hauritz unlucky but must go out. Siddle to have the game off too. Can anyone tell me why the Kat hasn't bowled more in this series? He'd probably go for 6 an over but he might just pick up the odd wicket or two along the way. Surely he's a better option with the ball than North.........IMHO

Back problem, pulls up terribly after bowling.

Siddle for Clarke and possibly Hauritz for Lee depending on the pitch would be my changes.

clarke is in the side so i cant see siddle being replaced by clarke

[brod]

So then to our bowling..................how the hell do we get 20 wickets in a test that looks like it might be rain effected again. Lee and S.Clarke MUST come in surely. Hauritz unlucky but must go out. Siddle to have the game off too. Can anyone tell me why the Kat hasn't bowled more in this series? He'd probably go for 6 an over but he might just pick up the odd wicket or two along the way. Surely he's a better option with the ball than North.........IMHO

Back problem, pulls up terribly after bowling.

Siddle for Clarke and possibly Hauritz for Lee depending on the pitch would be my changes.

clarke is in the side so i cant see siddle being replaced by clarke

How many times (we all know who he means)

[rod_rooster]

So then to our bowling..................how the hell do we get 20 wickets in a test that looks like it might be rain effected again. Lee and S.Clarke MUST come in surely. Hauritz unlucky but must go out. Siddle to have the game off too. Can anyone tell me why the Kat hasn't bowled more in this series? He'd probably go for 6 an over but he might just pick up the odd wicket or two along the way. Surely he's a better option with the ball than North.........IMHO

Back problem, pulls up terribly after bowling.

Siddle for Clarke and possibly Hauritz for Lee depending on the pitch would be my changes.

clarke is in the side so i cant see siddle being replaced by clarke

How many times (we all know who he means)

And on the other side of the argument how difficult is it to get it right?

[CoverKing]

yes i no Brod. i was just making sure he realises he spelt it wrong.
It just gets to me with people spelling them incorrectly. There two different players with two different names. why dont people know this and spell it correctly?

any who im happy now

[Pup]

yes i no Brod. i was just making sure he realises he spelt it wrong.
It just gets to me with people spelling them incorrectly. There two different players with two different names. why dont people know this and spell it correctly?

any who im happy now

Probably the first time i have ever done that and yes i am well aware of who i am speaking off and how to spell his name. Just a simple error.

[rod_rooster]

yes i no Brod. i was just making sure he realises he spelt it wrong.
It just gets to me with people spelling them incorrectly. There two different players with two different names. why dont people know this and spell it correctly?

any who im happy now

Lol, whilst i am with you on this the above errors in your own post did make me chuckle

[CoverKing]

yes i no Brod. i was just making sure he realises he spelt it wrong.
It just gets to me with people spelling them incorrectly. There two different players with two different names. why dont people know this and spell it correctly?

any who im happy now

Lol, whilst i am with you on this the above errors in your own post did make me chuckle

well the "no" part is just shorter thats my reason behind that.
the "there" part, well thats just because i had a typo. atleast i didnt add letters onto the word lol
Sorry pup, i have not said anything and i finally got to a point where i needed to say something. But RR had to spoil my fun

[Rik E Boy]

well the "no" part is just shorter thats my reason behind that.
the "there" part, well thats just because i had a typo. atleast i didnt add letters onto the word lol
Sorry pup, i have not said anything and i finally got to a point where i needed to say something. But RR had to spoil my fun

An herre's use jusst thinken your ignerent.

regards,

REB

[Real McCoy]

For me Lee & Clarke have to play, as someone has already said we need to take 20 wkts to win and with the bowling attack that we have had we don't look like doing this.
Siddle & Hauritz unlucky.

Haddin's glove work hasn't been all that flash, the selectors really need to make sure his finger is 100%, if not they have to play Manou.

[blink]

Haddin's glove work hasn't been all that flash, the selectors really need to make sure his finger is 100%, if not they have to play Manou.

Then Haddin shouldn't be playing - there is no way his finger would be 100% only a week after breaking it. I fractured mine 7 weeks ago and it is only just coming good now!

[Dissident]

Haddin will play purely because of his batting - I don't think they care about his 'keeping

If Manou had made 50+ or something, they would probably rest Haddin for this test.

That ball from Anderson would have got many top cricketers in the world out!

[Killa]

Hadden is not worth the risk and for lee won't be considered. Most likely be clark for siddle and may be McDonald for hauritz.

[Gozu]

According to Shane Lee Brett's pissed off about missing out. It's looking like Stuart Clark will play though.

[cyclops]

if lee does not play in this test then sum1 tell me why he wouldnt have been sent home?u would not let a bowler stay on tour when he was injured before the 1st test and yet is not going to be picked.for me lee and s.clark will play at the expense of hauritz and siddle.at least with clark also in the side,with watson playing also they can use lee as a pinch hitter,short spells or wot eva.it does not make sence to be able to carry a bowler for the whole series.

[Stumps]

the short answer IMO cyclops is that I think they will be very keen to play Lee at the oval, if not this test. The oval is regarded as the quickest and bounciest deck in the UK

[cyclops]

the short answer IMO cyclops is that I think they will be very keen to play Lee at the oval, if not this test. The oval is regarded as the quickest and bounciest deck in the UK

by then mate it could be over.u cant tell me that the selectors have held onto lee just for the 5th test,surely this would be rediculous.

[silicone skyline]

Two concerns:

A) Michael Clarke. Is he playing?

B) If Clarke doesn't play, Haddin in for Clarke, Clark in for Manou?

[Stumps]

the short answer IMO cyclops is that I think they will be very keen to play Lee at the oval, if not this test. The oval is regarded as the quickest and bounciest deck in the UK

by then mate it could be over.u cant tell me that the selectors have held onto lee just for the 5th test,surely this would be rediculous.

i see your point, but whats the advantage of sending him home, save $5k on hotel fees? May as well keep him justin case- the physio he needs to work with is over there etc etc