England in West Indies

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Re: England in West Indies

Postby jackpot jim » Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:53 am

Stumps Day 3
Eng 6/600 dec
W.I. 5/398 (Sarwan 184* n.o.)

Plenty of controversy on day 3 with ALL 5 dismissels in the Windies innings being LBW. :shock:

Chanderpaul (70) given OUT lbw challenged the decision and with replays CLEARLY showing the ball going well over the top of the stumps, 3rd umpire, Aussies Daryl Harper declined to reverse the decision. :oops:

And then another stuff up with Nash (33) given NOT OUT but Eng referred the Lbw appeal to Harper who incredibly reversed the decision and gave him OUT lbw despite replays supporting the central umpires original view that it was too High. :? :oops:

It seems that the system put in place to take the Doubt out of dodgy decisions still needs a lot of fine tuning.
jackpot jim
Coach
 
Posts: 6264
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:14 pm
Has liked: 433 times
Been liked: 512 times

Re: England in West Indies

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:24 pm

jackpot jim wrote:Chanderpaul (70) given OUT lbw challenged the decision and with replays CLEARLY showing the ball going well over the top of the stumps, 3rd umpire, Aussies Daryl Harper declined to reverse the decision. :oops:


How can a replay "clearly" show the ball going over the top, if it never did? The ball has been stopped in its' path and we will never know if it would have hit the stumps or not. 3rd umpires should never be allowed to udjudge LBW's.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: England in West Indies

Postby jackpot jim » Sun Mar 01, 2009 1:03 pm

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
jackpot jim wrote:Chanderpaul (70) given OUT lbw challenged the decision and with replays CLEARLY showing the ball going well over the top of the stumps, 3rd umpire, Aussies Daryl Harper declined to reverse the decision. :oops:


How can a replay "clearly" show the ball going over the top, if it never did? The ball has been stopped in its' path and we will never know if it would have hit the stumps or not. 3rd umpires should never be allowed to udjudge LBW's.


With the benifit of tv replays, the 3rd umpire should be better equipped to make a correct lbw decision than the 1st and 2nd (central) umpires who have a split second to weigh up the evidence.
jackpot jim
Coach
 
Posts: 6264
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:14 pm
Has liked: 433 times
Been liked: 512 times

Re: England in West Indies

Postby Pup » Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:49 pm

Looks like another stalemate unless England can pull out another 51 all out episode but very very unlikely on this deck.

West Indies declared last night at 9/749 (9th Highest Test Score)

Sarwan 291
Ramdin 166

England are currently 0/5 with a day to play. Nearly certain to be a draw.

What a ordinary series.
You sunk my Scrabbleship
User avatar
Pup
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:09 am
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: England in West Indies

Postby RoosterMarty » Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:15 pm

I think it is hilarious that the Windies have racked up such a massive total.
User avatar
RoosterMarty
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6524
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Adelaide (near Prospect Oval)
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: England in West Indies

Postby rogernumber10 » Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:28 pm

I reckon the West Indies have had a bit of a collective think along the lines of:
- We've been crap for a fair while now
- We don't have any trophies of any kind in the cabinet post 1995
- We are 1-0 up in this series
- How about we lay down roads for the rest of the series, and just hope we don't lose 20 wickets in a Test, and we get a trophy

Doesn't make for exciting cricket, or do anything for bowlers' averages, but I reckon it might be the plan.
Roger Woodcock -- 602 goals from a forward flank makes you a legend.
User avatar
rogernumber10
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: England in West Indies

Postby wycbloods » Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:33 pm

rogernumber10 wrote:I reckon the West Indies have had a bit of a collective think along the lines of:
- We've been crap for a fair while now
- We don't have any trophies of any kind in the cabinet post 1995
- We are 1-0 up in this series
- How about we lay down roads for the rest of the series, and just hope we don't lose 20 wickets in a Test, and we get a trophy

Doesn't make for exciting cricket, or do anything for bowlers' averages, but I reckon it might be the plan.


You can't blame them for doing that and i am glad to see they are doing it against the poms.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7006
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: England in West Indies

Postby rogernumber10 » Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:37 pm

No issues from me if the Pom bowling attack spends a winter tour grinding it out for no reward.
Roger Woodcock -- 602 goals from a forward flank makes you a legend.
User avatar
rogernumber10
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: England in West Indies

Postby jackpot jim » Mon Mar 02, 2009 3:08 pm

Pup wrote:
What a ordinary series.


Whats so ordinary about it?

1st Test was sensational with the Poms rolled for 51.

2nd Test Abandoned :oops: :oops:

3rd Test was one of the most Gripping and Tense Draws of all time.

4th Test. Has been a Run Feast and a Dull affair although have to hand to the windies batsman for at last showing some character and fight which has been missing for a long time.

1 dud test out of 3 doesn't make an ordinary series imo and who's to say something remarkable mightn't happen on the 5th day today?
jackpot jim
Coach
 
Posts: 6264
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:14 pm
Has liked: 433 times
Been liked: 512 times

Re: England in West Indies

Postby Pup » Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:23 pm

jackpot jim wrote:
Pup wrote:
What a ordinary series.


Whats so ordinary about it?

1st Test was sensational with the Poms rolled for 51.

2nd Test Abandoned :oops: :oops:

3rd Test was one of the most Gripping and Tense Draws of all time.

4th Test. Has been a Run Feast and a Dull affair although have to hand to the windies batsman for at last showing some character and fight which has been missing for a long time.

1 dud test out of 3 doesn't make an ordinary series imo and who's to say something remarkable mightn't happen on the 5th day today?


I dont get any pleasure out of watching a second rate side getting skittled by a second rate bowling attack for 51. To me thats a poor performance and not overly entertaining.

Second test was abandoned which was a disgrace and that is 5 days cricket that the supporters miss out on.

You are right the last day of the third test was good, well at least the last hour and a half.

Has been a run feast your right but it has been quite obvious its going to be a draw since stumps on day 2 IMO. But your right who knows what could happen today.

Yes there has been some highlights but it is not a series i will be keen to remember in 5 years.
You sunk my Scrabbleship
User avatar
Pup
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:09 am
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: England in West Indies

Postby MAY-Z » Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:48 pm

Pup wrote:
jackpot jim wrote:
Pup wrote:
What a ordinary series.


Whats so ordinary about it?

1st Test was sensational with the Poms rolled for 51.

2nd Test Abandoned :oops: :oops:

3rd Test was one of the most Gripping and Tense Draws of all time.

4th Test. Has been a Run Feast and a Dull affair although have to hand to the windies batsman for at last showing some character and fight which has been missing for a long time.

1 dud test out of 3 doesn't make an ordinary series imo and who's to say something remarkable mightn't happen on the 5th day today?


I dont get any pleasure out of watching a second rate side getting skittled by a second rate bowling attack for 51. To me thats a poor performance and not overly entertaining.

Second test was abandoned which was a disgrace and that is 5 days cricket that the supporters miss out on.

You are right the last day of the third test was good, well at least the last hour and a half.

Has been a run feast your right but it has been quite obvious its going to be a draw since stumps on day 2 IMO. But your right who knows what could happen today.

Yes there has been some highlights but it is not a series i will be keen to remember in 5 years.


ive enjoyed the bits and pieces of the series ive seen apart from the umpiring.

first test was something different, players like cook, strauss, pietersen, flintoff, collingwood are not second rate

because of the abandoned test another test was played so in fact the supporters got an extra 10 balls of test cricket

if england had managed to get sarwan out then they wouldve been very much favoured for the win in this test
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: England in West Indies

Postby Pup » Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:53 pm

Ifs and buts,

The fact is they could not get him out and now the game seems to be destined for a draw.

But your right i did not take into account the extra test so my mistake.
You sunk my Scrabbleship
User avatar
Pup
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:09 am
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: England in West Indies

Postby RoosterMarty » Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:14 pm

Yeah but it's not just any team getting rolled for 51.... it's the Poms! How can you not find that entertaining?
User avatar
RoosterMarty
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6524
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Adelaide (near Prospect Oval)
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: England in West Indies

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:15 pm

jackpot jim wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:
jackpot jim wrote:Chanderpaul (70) given OUT lbw challenged the decision and with replays CLEARLY showing the ball going well over the top of the stumps, 3rd umpire, Aussies Daryl Harper declined to reverse the decision. :oops:


How can a replay "clearly" show the ball going over the top, if it never did? The ball has been stopped in its' path and we will never know if it would have hit the stumps or not. 3rd umpires should never be allowed to udjudge LBW's.


With the benifit of tv replays, the 3rd umpire should be better equipped to make a correct lbw decision than the 1st and 2nd (central) umpires who have a split second to weigh up the evidence.


I disagree with that. The standing umpire is at ground level and is the best judge of the height of the ball when it strikes the pad. Ebery other view is distorted.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: England in West Indies

Postby panther » Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:59 pm

panther wrote:3 Tests and 3 of the most embarassing results in history

First Test
England out for 51
Can happen its a poor effort, but I guess all batsman try and just a rare occurence
Disgraceful

Second Test
They play for about 10 minutes
Test abandoned
Can you believe they prepared such poor playing conditions
Pitiful

Third Test
A courageous decision by Andrew Strauss to declare with a meagre 502 lead !!!
West Indies 9/370 draw the game
Bewildering


I consider the 502 target worse than the 51 dismissal
Down 1-0 in a series and you want to defend 502 [be ok if you are 1-0 up in the last test]

Question must be raised, was this the worst or near worst declaration in Test history ?


Fourth Test
another embarrasment for Englamd

WI 9/749 DECLARED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Which was the biggest embarasment for England ??????????????????????????

51 all out 1st test
draw setting a team 500+ and having them 9 down 3rd test
9/749 west indies made 4th test

My vote is the draw at least that was a destiny they had control of
panther
Rookie
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 6:56 pm
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: England in West Indies

Postby FD88 » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:31 pm

They cracked 700? LOL!
FD88
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:38 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: England in West Indies

Postby Pup » Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:17 am

The last day drifted to a draw.

England made 2/279

Cook 139*
Pieterson 72*

Shah failed twice on a road making 22.
You sunk my Scrabbleship
User avatar
Pup
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:09 am
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: England in West Indies

Postby brod » Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:22 am

England vs West Indies
Port Of Spain, Trinidad

Stumps Day One


ENGLAND 2/258
AJ Strauss 139*
AN Cook 12
OA Shah 29 (retired hurt)
KP Pietersen 10
PD Collingwood 54*

Two debutants in the match
Amjad Khan - ENG (opening bowler, who is the yougest player ever for Denmark)
Lendl Simmons - WI (batsman, who has played 8 ODIs with limited sucess and is nephew of Phil Simmons)
User avatar
brod
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19193
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: Willaston
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 27 times

Re: England in West Indies

Postby FD88 » Sat Mar 07, 2009 2:04 pm

Can't see this mob posing any threat to us in a few months. There the English media has been, in particular Botham talking up the superiority of their bowling attack over ours, but have a look at it now. Our current baby lineup would be enough to do the job you'd think, let alone one bolstered by a fit Lee and Clark.
FD88
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:38 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: England in West Indies

Postby stan » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:35 am

The Engish team is not even a shadow of what it was in 07 - 08. If Shah is batting at 3 in any side then I reckon your batting might be a bit thin.
At the moment this is there side:
Strauss - Been very good through out this series. New captain leading from the front.
Cook - Has the ability but been a bit hit and prehaps more miss in this series
Shah - Batting a 3??? WTF
Pietersen - Best Player in there side in my opinion. Has been looking alright in this series
Collingwood - Seems to make runs
Prior - Goes alright, useful with the bat. Completing with Ambrose for this spot. I think hes probably the go at the moment.
Broad - I dont rate him, A bit weak in my opinion,
Swann - No idea the moment.
Anderson - Well I dont know, Sometimes he goes well and can take wickets but then he comes on an bowls like and old lady
Panesar - Useful bowler in my opinion
Khan - No idea, only seen him bowl 4 overs and get killed by Gayle as many bowlers have in the past

In saying all of that they still made 500 odd.
The key in my opinion is the batting. Strauss, Cook, Pieterson and Collingwood.
I feel there missing Bell and flintoff.
There bowling doesnt look like they have enough to bowl a side out.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15440
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1309 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

PreviousNext

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |