Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby jackpot jim » Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:26 am

hondo71 wrote:NFC & JJ .....

1 Who comes in for Elliot?
2 Why does Deitz stay when he is averaging 20 - or is he going too?


1 Give Plant another go or if all else Fails....DIZZEEEEEEEEEE, (seeing that some people think that he cant bowl anymore)

2 Topped the Runs for SA last year i Think? and at least he has made a couple of tons in the last few years and also has a few years on his side unlike MATTY.
jackpot jim
Coach
 
Posts: 6264
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:14 pm
Has liked: 433 times
Been liked: 512 times

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby mal » Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:30 am

GWW wrote:If there was a young opening batsman to take his place it would be easier to drop Elliott. I had big hopes for Jason Borgas at the start of the season but it appears hes not ready to be a consistent performer at first class level just yet.

So i think its fair enough Elliott stays in the side for the time being.


J BORGAS V M ELLIOTT 2006-2007

ELLIOTT
19
7
0
6
43
81
0
5
16
4
9
3
0
0

193 RUNS
13-79 AVE

J BORGAS
18
7
66
68
38
95
27
1
5
83

408 RUNS
40-8 AVE

After one game this season J Borgas was dropped ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)
What message does this send to young players in SA ?
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29765
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2001 times
Been liked: 1984 times

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby mal » Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:47 am

smithy wrote:First class season 07/08

Matthew Elliott - 12 innings for 323 runs @ 29.36

Shane Watson - 5 innings for 28 runs @ 5.60

Franger Cup

Matthew Elliott - 5 innings for 259 runs @ 86.33

Shane Watson - 3 innings for 100 runs @ 33.33

NFC who started this thread and MALfunctioning credibility have been backing WATT000 to play for australia yet want Matthew Elliott dropped from the SACA's.....

Have a look at the current stats above and they tell a story......




ELLIOTT V WATSON

ELLIOTT
391 INNINGS
47-23 AVE

WATSON
99 INNINGS
46-65 AVE
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29765
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2001 times
Been liked: 1984 times

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby mal » Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:47 am

smithy wrote:First class season 07/08

Matthew Elliott - 12 innings for 323 runs @ 29.36

Shane Watson - 5 innings for 28 runs @ 5.60

Franger Cup

Matthew Elliott - 5 innings for 259 runs @ 86.33

Shane Watson - 3 innings for 100 runs @ 33.33

NFC who started this thread and MALfunctioning credibility have been backing WATT000 to play for australia yet want Matthew Elliott dropped from the SACA's.....

Have a look at the current stats above and they tell a story......



FIRST CLASS AVERAGES
ELLIOTT V WATSON

ELLIOTT
391 INNINGS
47-23 AVE

WATSON
99 INNINGS
46-65 AVE
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29765
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2001 times
Been liked: 1984 times

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby NFC » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:04 am

hondo71 wrote:NFC & JJ .....

1 Who comes in for Elliot?
2 Why does Deitz stay when he is averaging 20 - or is he going too?

Deitz has had pathetic treatment over the past few years, give him a freaking chance to get settled. He was our best batsmen last season with an average of close to 45. Elliott has been subpar for 2.5 seasons now and yet here you are going on about Deitz.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby NFC » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:05 am

bulldogproud wrote:He is averaging over 44 in the innings' that count, plus whereas the average time a member of the top six should head the scoring is 16.67%, Herb is topscoring out of recognised batsmen in 67% of SA's first innings'. He has a better record in that than any player in the Pura
Cup in Australia in any team! So are you saying that we need to drop every batsmen from every side in the Pura Cup??
Cheers

So why then do we even bother counting second innings runs? Why bother include them in a players statistics? :roll:
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby mal » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:17 am

The batting line up by game 1 next season

J BORGAS [or D HARRIS/PLANT/CAMERON]
L VINCENT
C BORGAS
C FERGUSON
M COSGROVE
D CHRISTIAN
S DIETZ
GILLESPIE

OUT
ADCOCK
MANOU
ELLIOTT
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29765
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2001 times
Been liked: 1984 times

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby GWW » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:19 am

Is Vincent a realistic chance of playing for us next season? Hes back in the NZ team, i would have thought he'd play there for a few years yet.
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15675
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 816 times
Been liked: 166 times

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby NFC » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:20 am

mal wrote:The batting line up by game 1 next season

J BORGAS [or D HARRIS/PLANT/CAMERON]
L VINCENT
C BORGAS
C FERGUSON
M COSGROVE
D CHRISTIAN
S DIETZ
GILLESPIE

OUT
ADCOCK
MANOU
ELLIOTT

Will they have the guts? Would be admitting a pretty big mistake.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby mal » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:23 am

GWW wrote:Is Vincent a realistic chance of playing for us next season? Hes back in the NZ team, i would have thought he'd play there for a few years yet.


VINCENT was very close to playing this year
He has told me personally that he loves the harder Australian wickets
He wants to come and play for SA sooner than later
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29765
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2001 times
Been liked: 1984 times

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby smithy » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:49 am

MAL - NFC ...... you can bring up all the stats you want over a career but we are talking NOW....

Don't try and cover up your blatant talk of Watson making the Australian team whilst he has lower stats than the player you want to drop from a state team..

We can all draw county stats etc to inflate an argument, but lets talk this seasons performances.
smithy
 

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby Hondo » Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:16 am

NFC wrote:Deitz has had pathetic treatment over the past few years, give him a freaking chance to get settled. He was our best batsmen last season with an average of close to 45. Elliott has been subpar for 2.5 seasons now and yet here you are going on about Deitz.


Again .... lets make excuses for some and crucify others at every opportunity

Besides, I thought we had to ignore last year's form or does that just apply to Adcock?

If you are going to start a thread about a guy averaging 29 be prepared for questions about his opening partner averaging 20 :shock:
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby bulldogproud » Sun Dec 16, 2007 9:47 am

NFC wrote:
bulldogproud wrote:He is averaging over 44 in the innings' that count, plus whereas the average time a member of the top six should head the scoring is 16.67%, Herb is topscoring out of recognised batsmen in 67% of SA's first innings'. He has a better record in that than any player in the Pura
Cup in Australia in any team! So are you saying that we need to drop every batsmen from every side in the Pura Cup??
Cheers

So why then do we even bother counting second innings runs? Why bother include them in a players statistics? :roll:


Everyone knows that the first innings sets up the match. It is pretty hard to win matches from way behind on the first innings. Ask anyone who has played the game at a high level whether they value the runs they made in the first innings more than they do those in the second innings of matches.
Cheers
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Location: West Beach
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 401 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby NFC » Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:24 am

hondo71 wrote:
NFC wrote:Deitz has had pathetic treatment over the past few years, give him a freaking chance to get settled. He was our best batsmen last season with an average of close to 45. Elliott has been subpar for 2.5 seasons now and yet here you are going on about Deitz.


Again .... lets make excuses for some and crucify others at every opportunity

Besides, I thought we had to ignore last year's form or does that just apply to Adcock?

If you are going to start a thread about a guy averaging 29 be prepared for questions about his opening partner averaging 20 :shock:

Ah okay, so Deitz's last season form means nothing? :roll:

2006/07: Deitz >>>>>>>>>>> Elliott.

Just because Elliott's pathetic average is slightly better than Deitz's average doesn't mean he's any good. Elliott is what, 36 odd, and he should be making runs or be out of the team. It's that simple.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby NFC » Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:25 am

bulldogproud wrote:
NFC wrote:
bulldogproud wrote:He is averaging over 44 in the innings' that count, plus whereas the average time a member of the top six should head the scoring is 16.67%, Herb is topscoring out of recognised batsmen in 67% of SA's first innings'. He has a better record in that than any player in the Pura
Cup in Australia in any team! So are you saying that we need to drop every batsmen from every side in the Pura Cup??
Cheers

So why then do we even bother counting second innings runs? Why bother include them in a players statistics? :roll:


Everyone knows that the first innings sets up the match. It is pretty hard to win matches from way behind on the first innings. Ask anyone who has played the game at a high level whether they value the runs they made in the first innings more than they do those in the second innings of matches.
Cheers

Of course it's important, but to completely ignore 2nd innings statistics is LAUGHABLE.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby bulldogproud » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:20 pm

Not ignoring second innings runs. Just saying that if you don't make them in the first innings you are pretty much out of the match. The first innings sets up the match, as to whether you have a chance of winning it.
Cheers
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Location: West Beach
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 401 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby Hondo » Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:39 pm

NFC - is Adcock safe then because he averaged 45 last season?

Seeing as we are basing our (knee-jerk / didn't check stats before starting thread :oops: ) Elliot v Deitz comparisons on last year :shock:

I mean why base selection on 2007-08/current form that's just crazy :?
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby Hondo » Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:46 pm

NFC wrote:Just because Elliott's pathetic average is slightly better than Deitz's average


Try 50% better :shock:
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby NFC » Sun Dec 16, 2007 3:02 pm

hondo71 wrote:NFC - is Adcock safe then because he averaged 45 last season?

Seeing as we are basing our (knee-jerk / didn't check stats before starting thread :oops: ) Elliot v Deitz comparisons on last year :shock:

I mean why base selection on 2007-08/current form that's just crazy :?

How many runs did Adcock make last season?

Why are we talking about Adcock? He's absolutely pathetic, as has Elliott been for 2.5 seasons.

Deitz is struggling yes, but he like Adcock and Elliott have been given, needs time.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Matthew Elliott has got to GO!!!!!

Postby bulldogproud » Sun Dec 16, 2007 3:40 pm

Why not drop the whole South Australian team and then start again, hey?
After all, only Elliott, Lehmann and Ferguson have topscored out of the recognised batsmen this season.
Lehmann has gone, you want Herb gone, so you may as well drop everyone!
Cheers
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Location: West Beach
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 401 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

PreviousNext

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |