
by pmackk » Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:00 pm
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:46 pm
whufc wrote:Dissapointed that a 32000 strong crowd could only raise $24000 to the Queensland flood disaster, thats less than a dollar a person who went to the game.
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:49 pm
by pmackk » Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:23 pm
I agree that the test crowd was alot better than the crowd last night.Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:As for the T20, good result, but I doubt I'll attend another T20 considering the type of people it seems to attract, more trouble last night than at the 4 test matches I attended combined.
by heater31 » Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:28 pm
pmackk wrote:I agree that the test crowd was alot better than the crowd last night.Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:As for the T20, good result, but I doubt I'll attend another T20 considering the type of people it seems to attract, more trouble last night than at the 4 test matches I attended combined.
by dedja » Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:31 pm
by heater31 » Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:34 pm
dedja wrote:LMAO ... adherence to the dress code bothers you???
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:13 pm
heater31 wrote:dedja wrote:LMAO ... adherence to the dress code bothers you???
yes it does because the time I go the break the rules is the time I won't be allowed in! It is either all in or all out IMHO.
Don't worry I'm not the only one complaining. Overheard some other member in his late 20's (only slightly older than me) bellowing rather loudly about the questionable attire of a female in the members bar
by dedja » Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:17 pm
heater31 wrote:dedja wrote:LMAO ... adherence to the dress code bothers you???
Don't worry I'm not the only one complaining. Overheard some other member in his late 20's (only slightly older than me) bellowing rather loudly about the questionable attire of a female in the members bar
by pmackk » Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:22 pm
Thats the SACA for youSam_goUUUdogs wrote:heater31 wrote:dedja wrote:LMAO ... adherence to the dress code bothers you???
yes it does because the time I go the break the rules is the time I won't be allowed in! It is either all in or all out IMHO.
Don't worry I'm not the only one complaining. Overheard some other member in his late 20's (only slightly older than me) bellowing rather loudly about the questionable attire of a female in the members bar
My 16 year old brother also commented on this, apparently board shorts and ripped jeans are both fine now.
He was also disgusted that people sat in the members were making comments such as ''f**k off pommie c**ts'' and that people around him were trying to bait him and getting quite abusive and in his face when an England wicket fell, he wasn't even wearing any England gear, a few people had just picked up that he was applauding when England played a good shot, generally if I'm sat in the members i applaud a good shot regardless of which team is batting, obviously that's not a common thing at T20.
I've been in the MCC and SCG members reserves over the last 2 weeks and I can honestly say they are a class above.
by heater31 » Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:31 pm
dedja wrote:heater31 wrote:dedja wrote:LMAO ... adherence to the dress code bothers you???
Don't worry I'm not the only one complaining. Overheard some other member in his late 20's (only slightly older than me) bellowing rather loudly about the questionable attire of a female in the members bar
LOL, are you a Mormon or something?
jokes, jokes, just jokes ...
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:39 pm
heater31 wrote:dedja wrote:heater31 wrote:dedja wrote:LMAO ... adherence to the dress code bothers you???
Don't worry I'm not the only one complaining. Overheard some other member in his late 20's (only slightly older than me) bellowing rather loudly about the questionable attire of a female in the members bar
LOL, are you a Mormon or something?
jokes, jokes, just jokes ...
Why is it that she was allowed in wearing something with the length of footy shorts in the 80's yet the men must wear collared tops and dress shorts? Ripped clothing of any sort is a definite no yet I saw several male and female patrons with such attire![]()
SACA had no hesitation in terminating the contract of their long standing cleaning contractor yet they can't seem to police a policy that has been in place for several years and is highlighted each season that what is acceptable and what is not.
by heater31 » Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:44 pm
Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:
The biggest problem IMO is there isn't enough SACA staff around the members reserve and particularly on the gates, its all welso staff on the gates, interstate its employees of the associations on the gates scanning tickets and enforcing the dress code, its their job to know and enforce things like the dress code, welso staff are security, regardless of if you put a red shirt on them rather than a yellow one, they'd care very little about what people are wearing as it wouldn't be overly high on their list of duties.
by dedja » Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:18 pm
by bayman » Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:27 pm
heater31 wrote:Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:
The biggest problem IMO is there isn't enough SACA staff around the members reserve and particularly on the gates, its all welso staff on the gates, interstate its employees of the associations on the gates scanning tickets and enforcing the dress code, its their job to know and enforce things like the dress code, welso staff are security, regardless of if you put a red shirt on them rather than a yellow one, they'd care very little about what people are wearing as it wouldn't be overly high on their list of duties.
there you go Sam you have hit the nail on the head. But I seem to recall that the first year they had it, several Adelaide Socialites made the social pages for being refused entry to the members. Now you seem to be extremely unlucky to be stopped for such indiscretions
by smac » Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:56 pm
by gadj1976 » Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:14 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:33 pm
gadj1976 wrote:Note Australian selectors..... the coaches at state level are already understanding the need to take the pace off the ball. CATCH UP!
Pi$$ Lee and or Tait off and bowl medium paced blokes and spinners who can win you games.
Note: Lee 41 and Tait 40 off their collective 8 overs. The difference perhaps?
by smithy » Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:46 pm
smac wrote:Tackling the big issues again here on SAFooty...
An organisation of 120 people cannot man the gates, surely? The security company are given the guidelines, they should be held accountable to them.
by heater31 » Fri Jan 14, 2011 7:22 am
smac wrote:Tackling the big issues again here on SAFooty...
An organisation of 120 people cannot man the gates, surely? The security company are given the guidelines, they should be held accountable to them.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |