by Lightning McQueen » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:04 am
by Armchair expert » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:05 am
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:07 am
Armchair expert wrote:Head looked more dangerous that these two.
by whufc » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:08 am
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:09 am
by amber_fluid » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:13 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:F*** me, now Langer comes in to try and send me to sleep
by The Dark Knight » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:21 am
by whufc » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:22 am
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:24 am
amber_fluid wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:F*** me, now Langer comes in to try and send me to sleep
His dry, monotone voice and captain obvious statements bore me as well.
There’s no humour or wit or intelligence, not sure why he’s there.
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:26 am
The Dark Knight wrote:Maharaj really looking to score and go after Cummins and Hazlewood, hopefully it will be his downfall.
Harmer has been very solid.
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:27 am
whufc wrote:Won’t ever happen but would love to see the game set up.
SAF declare now….aus declare 0/0.
SAF 269 to win
by whufc » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:32 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:Won’t ever happen but would love to see the game set up.
SAF declare now….aus declare 0/0.
SAF 269 to win
I’m happy for us to just bowl them out, then go do it again.
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:36 am
whufc wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:Won’t ever happen but would love to see the game set up.
SAF declare now….aus declare 0/0.
SAF 269 to win
I’m happy for us to just bowl them out, then go do it again.
Would love that but it’s looking increasingly unlikely.
Tailenders have improved to much, 8/9 faced 161 balls here. Wouldn’t happen often years ago.
by amber_fluid » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:41 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:Won’t ever happen but would love to see the game set up.
SAF declare now….aus declare 0/0.
SAF 269 to win
I’m happy for us to just bowl them out, then go do it again.
Would love that but it’s looking increasingly unlikely.
Tailenders have improved to much, 8/9 faced 161 balls here. Wouldn’t happen often years ago.
Wouldn’t have happened if Boland was playing.
Bringing in Agar and Renshaw was a redundant move, Agar is a poor man’s Bedgie.
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:45 am
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:46 am
amber_fluid wrote:
Does appear the Aussies got ahead of themselves here by trialling Agar before India.
Boland should have played even if in place of Renshaw.
by Armchair expert » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:47 am
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:48 am
Armchair expert wrote:Why have the helmet on the field anyway with 10 people running onto the field after each over anyway.
by Armchair expert » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:50 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Why have the helmet on the field anyway with 10 people running onto the field after each over anyway.
Remember when they used to lift the grass up and take the helmet out of a cavity in the ground?
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:50 am
amber_fluid wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:F*** me, now Langer comes in to try and send me to sleep
His dry, monotone voice and captain obvious statements bore me as well.
There’s no humour or wit or intelligence, not sure why he’s there.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |