
by stampy » Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:32 pm
by bulldogs » Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:44 pm
stampy wrote:how many wickets are we gunna relinquish before our bowlers stop flirting with bowling no balls ffs!!!!!!!!!!!!!, it isnt that ******* hard to adjust your run up by a foot is it??????
by Jim05 » Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:50 pm
stampy wrote:how many wickets are we gunna relinquish before our bowlers stop flirting with bowling no balls ffs!!!!!!!!!!!!!, it isnt that ******* hard to adjust your run up by a foot is it??????
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:34 pm
bulldogs wrote:stampy wrote:how many wickets are we gunna relinquish before our bowlers stop flirting with bowling no balls ffs!!!!!!!!!!!!!, it isnt that ******* hard to adjust your run up by a foot is it??????
How many No Balls get missed being called in a game. I would say S*** loads. If the umpire had picked up that the bowler is bowling No Balls then that Bowler will adjust his run up to hopefully rectify it. I think every ball should be judged. Seems unfair on the bowler to me
by wristwatcher » Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:35 pm
by Rik E Boy » Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:00 pm
Brodlach wrote:beeroclock wrote:bulldogs wrote:Certainly didnt make them play enough. After Lunch the bowling was terrible, reminded me of watching our bowlers as a kid in 85, balls on middle to leg that they just helped it on they way.
Was listening to some dreadful commentaryon ABC Radio switched it off at 4/240. Was pleasing to wake up to 7 fa.
I also thought our 3 Bowlers plus Watson all bowl pretty similiar at one stage Siddle and Harris bowling together it felt that the same stuff from both ends.
Yep.
Starc should have played for variety.
Who would he replace? Harris was good, Siddle was our best first test bowler and Pattinson wasnt going to be left out.
by daysofourlives » Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:31 pm
by heater31 » Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:42 pm
by Gozu » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:27 pm
by Gozu » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:30 pm
by the joker » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:31 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:38 pm
Jim05 wrote:stampy wrote:how many wickets are we gunna relinquish before our bowlers stop flirting with bowling no balls ffs!!!!!!!!!!!!!, it isnt that ******* hard to adjust your run up by a foot is it??????
Whilst I agree I dont like the fact that umpires use a review to check ot out.
Every ball needs to be a checked for a no-ball or dont use it at all.
Reckon the umps are using it as a cop out and I wonder how many other no-balls are missed during play because the umps are not keeping a close eye on it anymore. They now know that it doesnt matter if they dont call one all day because if there is a dismissal it gets checked automatically.
by Q. » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:51 pm
by dedja » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:51 pm
by Brodlach » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:51 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Jim05 » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:52 pm
by whufc » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:52 pm
by the joker » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:52 pm
by on the rails » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:53 pm
by Brodlach » Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:54 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |