by GWW » Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:37 pm
by Gozu » Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:38 pm
wristwatcher wrote:The first test thread had a coupla fellas sticking up for HauryId rather talk up the Mike Tyson ballet society. HAURITZ MUST GO
They dropped Krezja allegedly for his lack of economy in one test in Perth after getting 8 for in an innings in his first test
![]()
by smithy » Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:40 pm
wristwatcher wrote:smithy wrote:Wristwatcher...........
I suggest you read this thread.
http://safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=26255
From reading that id suggest REB is in fact Nathan Hauritz.
by Gozu » Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:48 pm
wristwatcher wrote:smithy wrote:Wristwatcher...........
I suggest you read this thread.
http://safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=26255
From reading that id suggest REB is in fact Nathan Hauritz. Talks about his 1 five for yet forgets to mention thats the test that is under intense scrutiny for match fixing![]()
Bottom line is if NH plays in the Ashes we are gonna find it very hard to take 20 wickets on enough occasions to win back the urn.
by smithy » Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:56 pm
Gozu wrote:wristwatcher wrote:smithy wrote:Wristwatcher...........
I suggest you read this thread.
http://safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=26255
From reading that id suggest REB is in fact Nathan Hauritz. Talks about his 1 five for yet forgets to mention thats the test that is under intense scrutiny for match fixing![]()
Bottom line is if NH plays in the Ashes we are gonna find it very hard to take 20 wickets on enough occasions to win back the urn.
2009 Ashes:
Graeme Swann- 5 Tests, 14 wickets @ 40.50, 3.32 rpo, SR 73
Nathan Hauritz-3 Tests, 10 wickets @ 32.10, 3.10 rpo, SR 62
Gozu wrote:I was one of those defending Hauritz. While your list clearly wasn't meant to be taken seriosuly I freely admit Hauritz has bolwed poorly in this Test. Reading between the lines I think Ponting might be giving the selector's (sorry they call themselves the NSP these days) an out to drop Hauritz ahead of the Ashes especially after North's spot saving knock. That's the only reason I can come up with bowling Hauritz into the ground when he (and the pitch) weren't doing anything.
by smithy » Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:04 am
GWW wrote:I hear Ray Bright is still available if needed.
by Gozu » Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:06 am
smithy wrote:
So which is it mate?![]()
Are you defending him or not?
by wristwatcher » Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:16 am
by Jim05 » Tue Oct 12, 2010 6:41 am
by Rik E Boy » Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:30 am
smithy wrote:Signature anyone ?Rik E Boy wrote:Hauritz is improving all the time. I'd hardly put Hauritz in the 'overrated' category. He is earning his stripes. Most perceptive Cricket watchers understand we aren't looking at Warnie here. People are starting to rate Hauritz because he has shown improvement, therefore he is not overrated. How do we know he has improved? Well you said so yourself, he has just taken his first 5 for.
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:39 am
wristwatcher wrote:smithy wrote:Wristwatcher...........
I suggest you read this thread.
http://safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=26255
From reading that id suggest REB is in fact Nathan Hauritz. Talks about his 1 five for yet forgets to mention thats the test that is under intense scrutiny for match fixing![]()
Bottom line is if NH plays in the Ashes we are gonna find it very hard to take 20 wickets on enough occasions to win back the urn.
by mal » Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:44 am
by smithy » Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:55 am
mal wrote:When discssussing the meritation of players playing for AU V IN over there this is what I do:
I almost totally disregard the form of players
So whether the player performs or fails is almost insignificant
Ponder this
If we selected teams on Indian soil performances the last decade or 2
WARNE would be an ordinary bowler and on the verge of being axed at times
PONTING would almost be dropped
There are also other unusual form lines, including HUSSEY who struggled for runs until the last Indian tour
I suggest if any of the current crop of players do fail disMALly they must be exonerated when the tour finishes
This is possibly the weakest AU team to play in India,and should not be expected to excel
Even the greatest teams to go there have had thier pants pulled down in the past
by mal » Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:01 am
by mal » Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:04 am
Jim05 wrote:The race to 200 is on. Tendulkar v Hauritz. The little master might just pip him.
Ps what is most runs any bowler gone for? Hauritz could get 250+ at this rate
by Dogwatcher » Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:06 am
mal wrote:Smithy
Test matches in India are held in low esteem
They dont even bother including them in the Commonwealth Games !
by Jim05 » Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:08 am
by Jim05 » Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:10 am
by Dogmatic » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:13 pm
Jim05 wrote:Just popped a lazy greenback on India win. If they get 150+ up and we have to survive a day 5 pitch lookout.
by Media Park » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:36 pm
Jim05 wrote:Hauritz could get 250+ at this rate
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |